User talk:NGerda~enwiki/Archive

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has now been reverted or removed. Please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles will be reverted quickly. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

Image on {{current}}

Hiya, if you're not seeing the new image chances are it is stored in your cache, so even though the new image is there you're not seeing it. You need to force-refresh (ctrl-F5 for Internet Explorer or ctrl-R for Firefox). I think that's what your problem is. :) Cheers, Talrias (t | e | c) 01:39, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Same-Sex Marriage map

Thanks for the kudos on the map. Look what a degree in graphic design gets you, heh. A chance to use your talent for free. Nothing more than an Illustrator job. Sorry I didn't reply on Wikinews, I didn't want to have to register there in order to post.
—Methylsoy 00:59, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

:) That's OK! I work mainly in Photoshop, and I plan to learn Illustrator. I redesigned the Wikinews logo in WAY higher resolution recently, but I used photoshop so it's resolution-restricted. Nice work! -- NGerda 02:19, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the great picture

Yo. Thanks for taking the nice picture you added to the L.A. page. I often thought about taking a picture of the I-110/I-105 interchange during the 3 years I lived in L.A., but I didn't have a good digital camera back then. I finally got a decent camera as a gift this month after I moved back to the Bay Area.

--Coolcaesar 01:55, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

:) Thanks a bunch! I also took some pics of the L.A. Mayor and U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer. Glad you're enjoying them! -- NGerda 01:44, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Earthquake.jpg

According to the FAQ for Google Earth: "You can personally use an image from the application (for example on your website, on a blog or in a word document) as long as you preserve the copyrights and attributions including the Google logo attribution. However, you cannot sell these to others…without first getting a rights clearance from Google."[1] As such this image is only available under a non commercial license. I understand that this image has been tagged as fair use, but I also think that we can quite easily create a free license map of the aftershock locations using freely available maps. Evil Monkey∴Hello 00:42, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Um...okay. I just thought that I could improve on the Google Earth image already uploaded. -- NGerda 00:46, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

2005 South Asia earthquake

Thank you for your contribution at 2005 South Asia earthquake. Please keep it up!!!Pradeepsomani (talk)

No prob! This is a very important event, and at least Britain is covering it right! (BTW, if you use Google Earth, I can email you the file I made of all the quakes) -- NGerda 03:51, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Indian subcontinent earthquakes list - P R A D E E P Somani (talk)
Feel free to send me e-mail.

5.25 10 October 2005

Jimbo Wales to Attend San Diego Meetup on October 18 2005

Hello, Jimbo Wales will be in San Diego to attend OOPSLA and has agreed to come by and visit with the San Diego wikipedians. If you are interested, you will find more info on my talk page. Johntex\^talk 00:54, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Details on the Meetup

I went to the Town and Country area last night to check out restaurants. I've eaten at the restaurants in Town and Country and they weren't that great, ao I wanted to find us somewhere nearby. There is a nice but expensive steak house down the street, but I don't know what everyone's budget is. I picked this place, I hope it is OK with everyone:

7:00pm Tuesday October 18th
24-Hour Valley Kitchen Family Restaurant
875 Hotel Circle South, Mission Valley, 619-819-1017 or 619-298-8282.
It is right across Highway 8 from the Town and Country Resort and Convention Center
It is very casual and comes highly recommended by the hotel desk. Entrees are $8-$15. They have a wide menu: They have breakfast all-days, salads, burgers, steaks, echilladas, pies, that sort of place.

See you there! Johntex\^talk 01:34, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

contributions to Rwanda and Rwandan Genocide

Hi NGerda, there is a Bibliography of the Rwandan Genocide for links relating to it. Even so, the link you gave was to the front page of an advocacy organization, rather than to the conference page mentioned. Also, links relating to the Genocide put on the country-level page are not appropriate. Please link only the specifically-relevant external page from the Bibliography page. I have removed your contribution in the meantime. Thanks, Banyan Tree 21:19, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Diwali

Image:SAUSD Boundry.jpg

I don't know where you got this map (Image:SAUSD Boundry.jpg), since you didn't provide a link to the original source, but you can clearly see that the underlying map is from Thomas Guides, and therefore is copyrighted. It is obviously NOT something that is US government created, and is NOT in the public domain, so it should not have had the {{PD-USGov}} added. Unless I hear from you fairly soon, I will edit the copyright tag and report the image to Copyright problems. Blank^Verse 11:40, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Two Harbors.jpg

Can you please add an appropriate summary for this image. See example Image:Gonzales courthouse 2005.jpg. Otherwise, there is not enough information to justify the public domain tag -Thanks Nv8200p talk 05:23, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So Cal Linux Expo

Since I notice you're local... I could use an extra Wikimedian or two to help man our exhibitor booth at the Southern California Linux Expo (February 11-12 in LA). In practice this mostly involves sitting around and occasionally explaining what this newfangled Wikipedia thing is to some people who have heard of it but don't know what it is, and chatting with a few casual users who drop by.

If you're interested or know someone who is, let me know. In particularly it would be great to have someone more familiar with some of the other projects like Wikinews. It scores you a free conference pass if you're into that Linux thing, and I can probably cover your parking if need be. --Brion 09:12, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invitation; I'll likely be able to attend one or both days. Perhaps we can meet up in Santa Ana this weekend before the conference. I'm based in the northern sector, but I can travel about if necessary. -- NGerda 20:13, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Partial revert

I reverted the section name change in Operation Just Cause, moving the "official justification" qualifier which you had added into the section title into the text itself. I agree that this qualification was missing (and in fact, I had been thinking of putting it in myself at some point), but renaming the entire section seems innappropriate, since there are other statements in that section which call into question the official justification given by Bush.--CSTAR 05:49, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I didn't catch that. -- NGerda 07:50, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 14% for major edits and 28% for minor edits. (Based on the last 144 major and 88 minor edits in the article namespace.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 05:00, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:C-smithers.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:C-smithers.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 13:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:PyongyangSat.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:PyongyangSat.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 03:41, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Johnson & U2

Hi, Do you have a reference for Robert Johnson's supposed influence on the music of U2? I hear nothing of RJ in their music, and I'm a fan of both. --RobHutten 10:26, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:SAUSD_Boundry.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:SAUSD_Boundry.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MECU≈talk 23:21, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Mike Ness 3.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mike Ness 3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Mike Ness 2.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mike Ness 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Social Distortion-Young.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Social Distortion-Young.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ولايات متحدة أمريكية

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on ولايات متحدة أمريكية, by Wiendietry (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because ولايات متحدة أمريكية fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

unused redirect page

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting ولايات متحدة أمريكية, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 11:54, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Natalia Verbeke

Thanks for translation the Natalia Verbeke article. Much appreciated! --Gidi70 10:12, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Ashley Wayne

A tag has been placed on Ashley Wayne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DAJF (talk) 03:59, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Danica Kennedy

A tag has been placed on Danica Kennedy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accurizer (talk) 04:05, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:One_Broadway_Plaza_1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:One_Broadway_Plaza_1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 22:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Tillman Thomas.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Tillman Thomas.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Tillman Thomas.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Melesse (talk) 22:52, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Never Again International

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Never Again International, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

clearly just boilerplate copied from website, not really notable

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 71.182.215.48 (talk) 08:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art

First off, I apologize for the spam. You are receiving this message because you have indicated that you are in Southern California or interested in Southern California topics (either via category or WikiProject).

I would like to invite you to the Los Angeles edition of Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art, a photography scavenger hunt to be held at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) on Saturday, February 28, 2009, from 1:00 to 7:00 PM. All photos are intended for use in Wikipedia articles or on Wikimedia Commons. There will be a prize available for the person who gets the most photos on the list.

If you don't like art, why not come just to meet your fellow Wikipedians. Apparently, we haven't had a meetup in this area since June 2006!

If you are interested in attending, please add your name to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art#Los Angeles County Museum of Art. Please make a note if you are traveling to the area (train or plane) and need transportation, which can probably be arranged via carpool, but we need time to coordinate. Lodging is as of right now out of scope, but we could discuss that if enough people are interested.

Thank you and I hope to see you there! howcheng {chat} 00:15, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Geānlǣht Rīcu American listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Geānlǣht Rīcu American. Since you had some involvement with the Geānlǣht Rīcu American redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). --hydrox (talk) 08:08, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]