User talk:Nickelodeon-fan

April 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article iCarly (season 6), please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. I removed the edit because tv-links.eu is not considered to be a reliable source. It is possible for users to edit (much like Wikipedia) freely, and there's no way of knowing if this information is verified. Thanks. Kevinbrogers (talk) 04:23, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Victorious (Season First)

I've redirected the article back to List of Victorious episodes. Please discuss at the talk page before doing this. Generally, an article must be very long before splitting, which the article is not. Also, the new articles must contain new information. Thanks. Kevinbrogers (talk) 23:29, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See also process described at WP:SPLIT. A split proposal has already been done for this article and consensus at that time was to not split the article. See discussion at Talk:List of Victorious episodes#Proposal to split details to season articles. --Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:40, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copying article content

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Victorious episodes into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:32, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Wizards of Waverly Place (season 1). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:50, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Jprg1966 ^(talk) 22:25, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of How to Rock episodes. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Viewing info must come from a reliable source. Comments added by anonymous people to a reliable source are not part of that. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:27, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wizards of Waverly Place (season 3), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 04:12, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings sources

Please do not use blogs, twitter posts, or comments left by users on Zap2it.com to source ratings for the Power Rangers episodes. None of these are officially posted and none of them can be considered reliable sources.—Ryulong (琉竜) 02:03, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Periods at end of sentence fragments

See MOS:PERIOD - "Sentence fragments in captions or lists should in most cases not end with a period." I noticed your adding them to sentence fragments in articles where they don't belong. You may wish to recheck your edits. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:48, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Sam & Cat episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dan Schneider (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello Nickelodeon-fan, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Sam & Cat has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:02, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Sanjay and Craig episodes may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

blogspot.ca/2013/06/nickelodeon-ratings-june-17-23-2013.html |title=Nickelodeon ratings (June 17-23, 2013|work=SonoftheBronx|first=Bronx|last=Son of the |date=June 28, 2013 |accessdate=
blogspot.ca/2013/06/nickelodeon-ratings-june-17-23-2013.html |title=Nickelodeon ratings (June 17-23, 2013|work=SonoftheBronx|first=Bronx|last=Son of the |date=June 28, 2013 |accessdate=

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:52, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Monsters vs. Aliens episodes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

blogspot.ca/2013/06/nickelodeon-ratings-june-17-23-2013.html |title=Nickelodeon ratings (June 17-23, 2013|work=SonoftheBronx|first=Bronx|last=Son of the |date=June 28, 2013 |accessdate=

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:53, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Your addition to Haunted Hathaways has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You copied all your additions from http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2013/07/01/nickelodeon-scares-up-laughs-with-new-live-action-supernatural-comedy-the-haunted-hathaways-premiering-saturday-july-13/189877/ You have been told about our copyright rules 17 days ago. This is serious and will lead to a block if you persist Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:40, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are still in the edit history and would have been good if you hadn't just copied the info from Zap2it. The organization changes to the article were appropriate. You just need to rewrite the sections in your own words for that info to be included in the article. I redirected List of Haunted Hathaways episodes back to the main article temporarily as all referenced info is back in the main article. Also you copied the episode summaries from the reference (copyvio again) and you didn't give proper attribution for the WP:SPLIT as is required by WP:CWW. --Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:58, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Sanjay and Craig episodes may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:21, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block warning

You were told in April of 2012 and again in July of 213 that you cannot copy content from one article to another without following the proper process. This is a legal requirement, and you cannot ignore this. You have continued doing this and since your last warning have created an issue because of that in at least one articles:

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2012 TV series) (season 1)
Victorious 3.0 Even More Music from the Hit TV Show (before your last warning)

I need to caution you that if you do this again you may be blocked without further warning for violating our copyright policies.

This is extremely important - almost as important as not copying from other websites. If you don't know how to do this properly and cannot understand the instructions at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia, please let me know at my talk page. I would much rather work with you to help you learn how to do this right than to see you blocked unnecessarily.

I will fix the problem with those articles, but please don't do this again. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:53, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Nickelodeon-fan. You have new messages at Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants (season 5)#Ratings not supported by references.
Message added 04:53, 5 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi I recently reverted the ratings you submitted at the linked article. You are invited to discuss my deletion if you think I was mistaken. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:53, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to SpongeBob SquarePants (season 6). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

Nickelodeon-fan, your edits are starting to look really jive to me. I've already reverted a bunch of your ratings contributions to "SpongeBob S5" because they didn't match your sources. Your recent addition here where you ascribe a 4.8 million viewership is supported by this reference, which neither lists the DAYS the shows aired, nor are 4.7 or 4.8 million viewers listed in the live views. In your edit here, you claim that 4.2 million viewers watched House Fancy. The episode is listed as airing June 6, 2008, which was a Friday, but your source reports a viewership of 4.0 or 3.9 million.

Since you didn't think it important enough to respond to my last invitation, I'm beginning to think you are not here to build an encyclopedia, rather to disrupt it. Please stop submitting erroneous information. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:33, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sam & Cat, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. See also WP:CWW, give proper explanations of what you are doing as required by wikipedia copyright rules Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:14, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Split of Sam & Cat to character article

I think a split is not justified based on the amount of content involved. Also it was done incorrectly without the required attributions. See WP:SPLIT and start a split discussion if you think a split is needed and see what other editors think. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:33, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit(s) to The Thundermans

Some or all of the content appears to be copy pasted.

Your addition: [1]
Source: [2]

If you copy paste content again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:58, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to List of Sam & Cat episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You have been warned about this before. Do it again and you will be blocked from editing Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:38, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistent copyright infringements. You have been told several times over the course of nearly five months that you may not post content to Wikipedia that you have copied from elsewhere, but you continue to do so. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:44, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning about garbage ratings submissions

It appears that you have been blocked for another matter, but I wanted to make sure that the following was addressed: On at least three occasions I've looked at the ratings you've submitted on various SpongeBob pages, and on each of these occasions I found major discrepancies. In this contribution you submit ratings for a few more SpongeBob SquarePants (season 6) episodes, but the ratings don't seem to match the shows you've linked them up with. One such example is for "Toy Store of Doom", which appears to have aired March 17, 2009 (according to TVGuide.com, which was a Tuesday. You used this source to attribute 4.1 million viewers, but that source doesn't list SpongeBob ratings for Tuesday. I also question the use of this source in general, as there's no indication in the article or in the source that the SpongeBob episodes in question premiered 5pm and 5:30pm (for example) or earned the listed ratings. Future ratings submissions, if incorrect, will be considered vandalism. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:42, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop hyperventilating

Please stop hyperventilating. You're going to have a heart attack. 24.211.179.19 (talk) 23:35, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of references from Breadwinners

Hi, is there a reason why you removed references from Breadwinners in this edit? It's difficult to understand your rationale because you didn't use an edit summary. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:31, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Your addition to List of Sam & Cat episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You have been warned about this before Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:17, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Henry Danger into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Wait for at least one episode of season 2 to actually be scheduled with a real date before WP:SPLIT of article. Also don't ignore the required attribution rules about copying content Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:25, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Propose WP:SPLIT on talk page first Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:32, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. As before Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:43, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Your addition to List of Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Even if you provide an inline citation as to where you got the episode summaries from, they still need to be written in your own words, not copied from the source(s). MPFitz1968 (talk) 04:15, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Talia in the Kitchen has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Logical Fuzz (talk) 19:59, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you wish to resume editing, it may be necessary for you to demonstrate your understanding of these policies and reassure the community of your willingness to comply. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:21, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lists of Nickelodeon shows episodes has been nominated for discussion

Category:Lists of Nickelodeon shows episodes, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. nyuszika7h (talk) 20:49, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sam & Cat has been nominated for merging

Category:Sam & Cat has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (Oinkers42) (talk) 18:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]