User talk:Nightcafe1

absinthe

I liked many of your additions to the absinthe page, you might consider working on the Absinthe in popular culture page or the Absinthiana page as well. -- Ari 22:39, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ari, Thanks for the help!

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 13:45, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 13:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Absinthe, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Absinthe was changed by Nightcafe1 (u) (t) deleting 7533 characters on 2008-03-09T16:48:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Absinthe Supreme Spoon.jpeg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Absinthe Supreme Spoon.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:19, 12 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:19, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Artemesia-Spoon.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Artemesia-Spoon.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Artemesia-Spoon.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrtirs (talk) 00:56, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Artemesia Spoon.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Artemesia Spoon.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Artemesia Spoon.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrtirs (talk) 00:56, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FARC Absinthe

Absinthe has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Please notify anyone else involved. Domiy (talk) 03:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Obsello Absenta

The article Obsello Absenta you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Obsello Absenta for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Please read about good article criteria before nominating another article. The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 18:38, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{adminhelp}} {{helpme}} Hello I have been involved with defending and now editing the Obsello article. A senior editor is arguing for deletion and does not seem to be open to logic. He does not seem to understand the spirit or the spirits category and I fear I am not skilled enough nor do I have enough time to adequately defend the article. I am looking for help. The Obsello page is one thing but this logic would threaten every interesting liquor distillery that is within the scope of the wiki-spirits project. I have no interest in editing spirits pages if we can only do so with Jack Daniel's. I am much more interested in award winning and exciting indie spirits, provided that they have enough noteworthiness to justify their inclusion. As far as I am concerned Obsello has more than enough noteworthiness and I dont know how to do anything more than what I have done.

Hi! -- Who is arguing for deletion, and where is this discussion taking place? Without reading their words it's hard to help.—S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 17:32, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, I see. Do you mean Fences and windows? If so, he's a very reasonable bloke and you can try just talking to him.
  In any case, if he was serious about deletion, he'd take the matter to articles for deletion. If he does that, you have something to worry about, but Fences and windows has a reputation as the guy that rescues articles rather than someone who deletes them.—S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 17:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Nightcafe1. You have new messages at The New Mikemoral's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 18:22, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Picassoabsinthdrinker.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Picassoabsinthdrinker.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:18, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Spirits needs you!

Hello,

You're recieving this message as a contributor to WikiProject Spirits in the past. Currently many members work solo and articles that interest themselves, we'd like to pull the Spirits group together to allow us to raise the overall quality of articles under our banner. If you're still active on Wikipedia and keen on contributing to WikiProject Spirits, head over to the talk page and lend your voice to the discussion. Cabe 6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 13:56, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lost Spirits

Hello Nightcafe1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lost Spirits for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:01, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lost Spirits, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Charleston and Bryan Davis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lost Spirits, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Hotel paris absinthe toulouse-lautrec-monsieur-boileau.jpg

The file File:Hotel paris absinthe toulouse-lautrec-monsieur-boileau.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:VanGoghSelfPortrait.jpg

The file File:VanGoghSelfPortrait.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:StillLifeWithAbsinthe.jpg

The file File:StillLifeWithAbsinthe.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:StillLifeWithAbsinthe.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:StillLifeWithAbsinthe.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]