User talk:Nitareeny

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sex in the Title (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sex in the Title and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 20:09, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nitareeny, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 20:09, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sex in the Title concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sex in the Title, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:13, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Your addition to Draft:Sex in the Title has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The material you added on the 5th was also copied directly from another website, and thus was a copyright violation. Please don't add copyright material to this wiki. If you are the copyright holder and wish to release this material to Wikipedia under license, please see the instructions at WP:Donating copyrighted materials. There's a sample permission email at WP:Consent. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:30, 6 May 2017 (UTC) — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:30, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:40, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to this wiki in violation of our copyright policy and copyright law. You cannot resume editing until you provide a clear statement that demonstrates that you have read and understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:43, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diannaa, I'm not sure why you blocked me and would like to know the specific reason why you blocked me. I was trying to edit my page and trying to add sections that would make the page look good and hopefully be one that Wikipedia would approved. I used another author's page example so that I could also add that information on my draft. I didn't copy said author's info and add it to the page, I used it as a guideline. Not sure why that would be something that would be a cause for being blocked. Nitareeny (talk) 23:36, 4 October 2017 (UTC)nitareeny[reply]

The specific copyright violations I found yesterday were on Draft:Sex in the Title, Draft:City Solipsism, and Draft:The Doorman. Since you had already received two warnings (May 2 and May 6) for copyvio, I blocked your account. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nitareeny (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not copy any working from the site and used my own words to describe the awards the book were given

Decline reason:

I have just checked your contributions and found several passages copied verbatim from http://sexinthetitlebook.com/ . These entries have been redacted from the page histories because of the copyright violation (so only administrators can see them), but I'm sure you know the edits to which I'm referring. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:24, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi Diannaa and Yunshui, I went back and looked at my prior violations and this one and I now see what I did wrong and understand why you blocked me. I also re read the copyright policy and understand that what I did can cause legal trouble for you and the author's websites that I copied from. I didn't not do it with malicious intent but I realize malicious or not, doing so could hurt Wikipedia. I apologize and fully intend on following those guidelines in the future if I am allowed to be unblocked. Nitareeny (talk) 14:21, 5 October 2017 (UTC)nitareeny[reply]

I have unblocked your account, since you have now read and understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. Further copyright violations will result an you being re-blocked. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 03:29, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zack Love

Hello, Nitareeny. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zack Love".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:10, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at Draft:Sex in the Title. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:00, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nitareeny (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Diannaa (or which ever Wiki Editor/User is reading this),

I understand that I was blocked for a copyright violation but I can't figure out what the basis for this block is.

Because of prior issues like this, I was careful to check my summary on this web site: https://www.quetext.com/report/4c17148b7b4301c4f8f0

The report identified a 7% plagiarism risk based on this text: "The next day, his girlfriend dumps him, also via email."

But that appears on the author's web site and the author (Zack Love) already sent an email on April 30, 2018 to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (with me cc'ed) authorizing me and Wiki to use any text on his site.

I also checked the text I tried to use in my article on: https://smallseotools.com/plagiarism-checker/ and that site flagged these two quotes:

1) "Originally from Ghana but educated at Oxford, Trevor charms anyone who hears him talk — if they can turn their attention away from his extraordinary six-foot-seven height"

2) "His buddy Heeb knows nothing about publishing but is confident of one thing: Evan’s book should have the word “sex” in the title."

But both of those lines are also from the author's web site and (again) he explicitly gave me and Wikipedia permission to copy any text or image from his web site.

If there is some other offending text besides those I've mentioned and that other offending text is not from his web site, please tell me what it is so that I can address it.

More generally, what tool is Wikipedia using so that I can make sure that I don't submit any text that will be flagged as problematic by that tool?

Lastly, should I ask the author to email you another permission that specifically addresses some particular text? In addition to that authorization/license email that he sent to me (and Wikipedia) on April 30 in which he said that any text from his entire web site could be used, I also got his approval for the entire text that I tried to add to Wikipedia, so it shouldn't be a problem to have him send you the same approval for the text of the article itself.

I hope this addresses your concerns. I have the highest respect for copyright and was operating under the good-faith belief that -- based on the permissions the author gave earlier (and his approval of the entire text that I submitted) -- the article I submitted was not violating anyone's copyright.

Hopefully we can resolve this matter ASAP, and I'll be happy to answer any questions or concerns you may have.Nitareeny (talk) 01:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC)Nitareeny[reply]

Decline reason:

This is your third block for violating copyright. There seems little chance that you are ever going to understand and follow our copyright policy. EdJohnston (talk) 03:41, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi Ed, my understanding is that if the owner of the copyrighted material gives me permission to use it, then there is no copyright violation. That is exactly what happened with my last contributed text. If you disagree, please tell me precisely where I used copyrighted material without permission (or let me know what additional proof of permission you require -- beyond the email that the author sent me and Wikipedia last April). Thanks, Nitareeny (talk) 00:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)Nitareeny[reply]

See WP:DONATETEXT for one way in which you can successfully prove to Wikipedia that the material is free for our use. If you believe that the author has already gotten permission through WP:OTRS then they should have received an OTRS case number that can be used for proof of the release. EdJohnston (talk) 00:38, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sex in the Title

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sex in the Title, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It is a draft which has not been edited in over six months. (See section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ―Gregorius II 05:54, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:City Solipsism

Hello, Nitareeny. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "City Solipsism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Phospheros (talk) 20:57, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Doorman

Hello, Nitareeny. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Doorman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Phospheros (talk) 21:02, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anissa's Redemption

Hello, Nitareeny. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anissa's Redemption".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 20:47, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stories and Scripts: An Anthology

Hello, Nitareeny. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stories and Scripts: An Anthology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:47, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Waiting for 2000

Hello, Nitareeny. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Waiting for 2000".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 07:08, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Central Park Song

Hello, Nitareeny. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Central Park Song".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:03, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zack Love

Hello, Nitareeny. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zack Love".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:20, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]