User talk:Oertherdb

Apologies if this is an inappropriate request for admin assistance. I am writing to request assistance on possible vandalism of BLP article Daniel Oerther (i.e., see unsourced/poorly sourced edits since 31 March by recently created/anonymous account(s)). As I am the subject of the article (i.e., COI), I had thought the appropriate approach was to place a helpme tag on Talk:Daniel Oerther asking other editors to consider reverting and/or placing a semi-protected status on Daniel Oerther. After reading further the links shared by Phil Bridge on Talk:Daniel Oerther, it seems that a more appropriate approach is to place an adminhelp tag on my user talk page here with a description of the concern. Again, if this is also a wrong approach, I'm open to reading more to better understand how I might address this concern. Thanks, in advance, for assistance. Dan Oertherdb (talk) 01:01, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

I've had a quick look and reverted the latest addition. If it's accurate, it will likely be included in some form sooner or later, but it will need better sourcing and an encyclopaedic tone. That should solve the immediate problem. For anything longer-term, you might be best asking for help at WP:BLPN. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:06, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Oertherdb, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Oertherdb! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Soni (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nursing Open (July 5)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined

Dan arndt (talk) 05:58, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Nursing Open has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nursing Open. Thanks! Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:50, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

January 2020

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Alumni Thematic International Exchange Seminars. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — 🎆 Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:20, 1 January 2020 (UTC) Thanks. That's a very helpful point. I wasn't fully aware of the "rules", and I'll make an effort to go back and fix past entries and include this approach as part of future work. Very helpful! Best, Dan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.172.195.96 (talk) 19:29, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Alumni Thematic International Exchange Seminars moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Alumni Thematic International Exchange Seminars, does not have enough independent sources and citations as written to remain published. (Medium is the only 3rdparty source, and it isn't really reliable enough to show notability ) . I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 00:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Alumni Thematic International Exchange Seminars

Hello, Oertherdb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alumni Thematic International Exchange Seminars".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Convergence research has been accepted

Convergence research, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 00:51, 24 February 2022 (UTC)