User talk:Olhellel

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/backvendor.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Wywin (talk) 13:51, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/backvendor concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/backvendor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:15, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/backvendor

unblock-spamun|Olhellel|Your reason here Hello Olhellel. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "backvendor".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/backvendor}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:25, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Olhellel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Olhellel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TomStar81 (Talk) 09:32, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Olhellel (talk) 09:39, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have reviewed the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applause and want to add pages for top software testing companies to Wiki (Hockeyapp, Testfairy, etc.). If you think that the page is related to Ubertesters looks like a spam, please explain why the page about Applause is here? What is a criteria?

I kindly ask you to explain this situation. In the case of my message rejection let me know, where I can take a look what kind of rules I have broken to avoid this situation in the future.

Regards,

Victor

P.S.: Also, it is not my first page created in Wiki. I have posted and edited pages for UA and RU segments before.

July 2016

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:03, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 07/29/2016

unblock-spamun|Olhellel|Hi. I do not understand the following: 1) How my username (Olhellel) "indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group". I have created it more than 4 years ago. 2) I do not get the reply to my questions: - Why the information that I put to wiki looks like a spam? I have posted the example of the other page that should be deleted in the case of Wiki policy to. But it is on the site. That means that the person who marked my post either got something wrong or do the actions that violate Wiki rules. - What rules I have braked? I'd like to clarify this moment and not to do it again — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olhellel (talk • contribs)

I've fixed the format of the unblock request for you, and please sign your messages with "~~~~". Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak: I have to say I'm not seeing what's inherently promotional about the name "Olhellel" either, what am I missing? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Boing! said Zebedee. If I had a reason, I can't see it now. The most likely reason is that I hit my "delete and block" tab instead of just the easyblock "delete". Now unblocked, apologies for my carelessness.

Olhellel, I deleted your user page because

You cannot host articles about any company on your user page
Even as an article, it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. Your refs did not meets the criteria. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits, not just what it sells, which is promotional.
If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:57, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

See also WP:COI in case it might apply. --Ronz (talk) 21:36, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Temed (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Olhellel/sandbox/Temed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Olhellel/sandbox/Temed, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:38, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Olhellel, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:38, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]