Jump to content

User talk:PPCsteph

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Raiklen (May 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Praxidicae (talk) 19:04, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, PPCsteph! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Praxidicae (talk) 19:04, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Very bad form

[edit]

It's very bad form to create your article in main article space in spite of it being rejected as a draft. I have deleted it. Please work on getting your draft approved instead. It is far from being ready for main article space. See WP:MUSICBIO to get an idea of what the person needs to merit an article in Wikipedia. At the moment, the sources you cite don't demonstrate notability of the subject. See Wikipedia:Golden rule for an overview of what we expect. Thanks. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:45, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Raiklen (June 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:40, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
PPCsteph, as you can see from the red links above, Draft:David Raiklen has been deleted as a copyright violation, as it was copied more or less word for word from th various sources. With a few rare exceptions, everything you write in Wikipedia must be entirely in your own words. If you have some personal or professional connection to Raiklen you should disclose it; if you receive or expect to receive any kind of financial benefit from him or his agents, disclosure is obligatory. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:09, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined
Dan arndt (talk) 03:28, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 16:25, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rand Rusher, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Harshil want to talk? 02:17, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.— Harshil want to talk? 03:39, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rand Rusher, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Harshil want to talk? 04:43, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.-- Harshil want to talk? 04:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, you may be blocked from editing. -- Harshil want to talk? 04:48, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, PPCsteph, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Rand Rusher, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Levivich 04:49, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on David R. Raiklen, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Harshil want to talk? 04:59, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, PPCsteph. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page David R. Raiklen, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara 06:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Athaenara 06:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PPCsteph (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello! I do not have a personal relationship with anyone that I posted about nor have I received compensation. I wrote about individuals whose careers I’ve followed and shows I’ve watched. I have not received any monetary compensation for the articles that I’ve written or edited. Please remove my block. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PPCsteph (talkcontribs) 08:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

User unresponsive. You may make a new request should you wish to answer. 331dot (talk) 09:03, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You say that you "do not have a personal relationship with anyone that I posted about"; do you have a non-personal relationship, such as a professional relationship? 331dot (talk) 18:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This editor has a history of posting articles that have been declined in AFC to main space, and creating copyvio content, requiring others to clean up afterward. Overall I am not seeing unblocking as a net benefit for the Wikipedia project unless this editor agrees to change past practices. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]