Jump to content

User talk:ParalysedBeaver

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you need to discuss any changes I make, please use this page. Thank you.
Back to user page


Max Ramirez

[edit]

You're welcome. Thanks for helping with newpages patrol; it's appreciated. Canderson7 (talk) 02:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're right that this band isn't notable enough for an article. It certainly seems to fail WP:MUSIC, so I've added a prod tag to it. Canderson7 (talk) 02:18, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, Beav! Pretty fast on the trigger with the "Speedy Deletion" notice. Whyn't ya give us five minutes (or more like an hour or two) to get some content on there! Sheesh! We're working it.--BillFlis 00:07, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about most cities having their own sports articles, but NYC and Chicago do. There's already enough material in the main Philly article to make a separate sports article, and having sports be separate allows us to broaden the coverage, even to semi-pro and school sports. I broke out Cuisine of Philadelphia some months ago.--BillFlis 00:28, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned public domain images

[edit]

The following images were uploaded by you, but are currently not in use. They have been tagged as public domain (PD), either as PD-self or other PD claim. These unused PD images may be subject to deletion as orphans. You may wish to add them to an article, tag them for copying to WP commons {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} or if they are no longer needed, they can be tagged for deletion by you as {{db-author}}. If you have any questions, please leave me a note on my talk page. --Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:47, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I had no idea the Counter Strike custom map page had been deleted. --ParalysedBeaver 02:29, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hana

[edit]

Why, exactly, did you add an extra "T" to her name? Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 04:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. I rechecked. Still, add a span id next time. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 04:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still a newb to this. Whats a span id?--ParalysedBeaver 05:23, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Don't sweat it. They're actually not in wide circulation. adding <span id=""/> just one line above a section title will allow for a section-specific link to whatever you put within the quotation marks. It's definitely not to be abused, but in cases where a section needs a title change, you can use this to keep old links functional. I've found it to be especially useful ith the Heroes characters, whose section titles are in near flux for a variety of reasons. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 07:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Lawlhaxes9.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lawlhaxes9.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:10, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status

[edit]

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. :) I have removed the {{db-g6}} template you placed on this redirect for now as your reasons for desiring its deletion is unclear and hence I can't judge if the deletion is, as G6 requires, uncontroversial. The article was just moved to WarGames: Defcon 1 with a note by its creator that this is the proper title. The external links on that article and the image seem to support that WarGames is one word in this case, and the two word variation seems like a plausible redirect. If I have misunderstood the purpose for this deletion request, please drop me a note or use the specifier recommended for WP:CSD#G6, {{db-g6|wording=reason}}. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:37, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]

Hi ParalysedBeaver, I've left you a message on my talk page -- Marek.69 talk 04:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

[edit]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello ParalysedBeaver! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only. 
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Welcome Reality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Being Human (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:09, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Enterprise centre in Ireland was accepted

[edit]
Enterprise centre in Ireland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Events happening in Dublin

[edit]

Hi! As you tagged yourself as being in Ireland, I hope you don't mind me reaching out. We know have a recognised Wikimedia Community Ireland User Group and we have been running workshops and other events in Dublin and beyond. In case you are interested our next event will be this Saturday in Collins Barracks, you can find the details here. Smirkybec (talk) 22:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

[edit]

Hi ParalysedBeaver,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, ParalysedBeaver. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, ParalysedBeaver. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Enterprise centres in Ireland for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enterprise centres in Ireland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enterprise centres in Ireland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guliolopez (talk) 00:03, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, ParalysedBeaver. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

[edit]

Hello, I'm Sink Cat. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Matthew Dominick, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Your local Sink Cat (The Sink). 04:07, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]