User talk:Pch172

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?

Hello! Pch172, you are invited to join other new editors at the Wikipedia Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on wiki where you can ask questions about editing and receive support & help from experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Sarah (talk) 19:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria policy

Please do not place or replace any non-free images to any pages except for actual articles, such as you did at your talk page. Such use is a clear violation of point number 9 of our policy concerning the use of non-free images. Continuing to do so can be viewed as disruptive behaviour and you may be blocked from editing. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:09, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

However, I'm not copying non-free images anywhere else, so why are you pinning me down for this? Pch172 (talk) 20:22, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure precisely what you mean by "pinning [you] down for this", but I am editing your userpage and trying to educate you here because you are violating a Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia's policy regarding non-free content is explicitly stricter than that required by fair use, and part of that involves limiting it to only those areas where its use would directly contribute to our educational purpose, which is to say in articles. Please let me know if you have any further questions about this matter. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:06, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Formula One season

Hi Pch172,

Could you please stop adding content to the 2014 Formula One season page - particularly in the article lead - that quotes Bernie Ecclestone as saying the 2014 engines are about to be scrapped? The reason is that Bernie has no power to influence the technical regulations of the sport. That power rests with the FIA, and until such time as they say that the 2014 engines will be abandoned, we are to assume that they will go ahead. It doesn't matter if you have a reliable source backing up Ecclestone's comments - he's not in any position to influence those regulations, and so we cannot include his comments in the articles. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 00:09, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Formula One season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Suzuka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed

Pch172, please do not put in citation needed templates into the 2013 Formula One season page simply because you think it is likely that Massa, Grosjean and Maldonado will continue racing with their respective teams. Opinion is no substitute for fact. Until such time as you can find a reliable source stating that Driver A will race for Team B, please leave the driver field blank.

This is why your citation needed templates are inappropriate:

1) As you say, Ferrari is considering one of three drivers. And although there are sources supporting di Resta and Hulkenberg at Force India, Vijay Mallya has said that he will not stand in the way of either driver if they are offered a contract with a front-running team. Even if Force India change their stance and keep Hulkenberg and di Resta absolutely, that does not automatically mean that Massa will stay with Ferrari. Other rumours in the silly season have linked Heikki Kovalainen to that seat, so it is conceiveable that neither Massa, di Resta not Hulkenberg will race for Ferrari.

2) It doesn't matter what Romain Grosjean "hopes" will happen. If he doesn't have a contract, he doesn't have a contract, and he cannot be included in the table. If all it took was a driver saying he "hoped" to race for a team, pretty much every driver on the grid would be listed as driving for Ferrari.

3) In the case of Maldonado, he has recently made comments that he is "keeping his options open" for 2013. While this is not enough to justify removing him from the table on its own, there is no source available that states he will be driving for Williams in 2013. Because we cannot prove that he is driving for them, we cannot include him. The original source given was taken from a magazine that nobody seems to be able to confirm.

Putting a citation needed template into an article does not make speculative edits okay. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 00:20, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Formula One season

Hi. The changes you're currently making to the 2015 Formula One season article are essentially recreating an article that has been speedy-deleted as too speculative several times. Having a page that's substantially similar to one that's recently been deleted is grounds for that page being speedy-deleted (WP:G4). For this reason, I've removed the content you added. Please don't revert. Dricherby (talk) 23:35, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2013–14 Southampton F.C. season

The article 2013–14 Southampton F.C. season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTCRYSTAL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Uberaccount (talk) 21:38, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The quality of your edits

Once again, Pch172, I find myself asking you to put more thought into your edits. I have had to undo these edits to the 2015 Formula One season page because I feel they are of particularly low quality.

Firstly, the Canadian Grand Prix is not a proposed race. It is an existing race with an expiring contract, which makes it a calendar change. A "proposed race" would be a race that does not exist at the moment, and is attempting to join the calendar for the first time - like the proposed Thai Grand Prix.

Speaking of the Thai Grand Prix, I have also removed that section of the article, because the wording violated several elements of the Manual of Style. Firstly, you word it as "apparently will be occuring", which in and of itself casts doubt on the chances of the race happening - which is not an acceptable way to word it, given that Wikipedia is concerned with fact. Secondly, you claim that the organisers are yet to sign a contract with the FIA, but the contract to host the race is signed with FOM. Finally, your wording makes it pretty clear that the race is speculative in nature.

This is just one edit in what I have noticed to be a trend with your edits. This is the third time in a year that I have had to ask you to put more thought into what you edit before you edit it in. I suggest that you stop editing these pages until such time as you are familiar with the Manual of Style and Wikipedia's policies on speculative content and reliable sources. Because, quite frankly, your edits are constantly and consistently poor, and while your intentions are clearly good, your edits have generally been disruptive. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 11:50, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1991–92 Southampton F.C. season may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:04, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1991–92 Southampton F.C. season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Penalty, Kevin Richardson, Richard Hall and Hillsborough

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to FIFA 14 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

</ref> 21 Brazilian clubs are licensed: all 20 from the [[2013 Campeonato Brasileiro Série A]]<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_Se1AYT7Zvs https://www.youtube.com/watch?

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:00, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FIFA 14, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Primera División (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2013 F1 Drivers Standings

Template:2013 F1 Drivers Standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 (talk) 11:17, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2014 in British television

Thanks for getting this article started. I'd had it in mind to do it as some point, but kept overlooking it. Paul MacDermott (talk) 14:40, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Seattle Sounders FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Juan Guzman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2016 Formula One season (May 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/2016 Formula One season.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:39, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Forza Rossa Racing

Pch172, please stop adding Forza Rossa to the team and driver chart in the 2015 Formula One season article, unless the FIA formally confirm it (you will know it if they do; it will be headline news). Prisonermonkeys (talk) 23:33, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2016 Formula One season (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Wikipedia:Articles for creation/2016 Formula One season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 14:21, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "2015 Formula One season". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!Tvx1 (talk) 17:15, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above DRN looks like it might be drawing to a close, if you have anything further to add to it please feel free to weigh in. SPACKlick (talk) 02:18, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm Legacypac. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of sovereign states in the 2010s because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. you added 3 non-counties that have repeatedly been rejected for inclusion. See talk. Legacypac (talk) 17:54, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Markup

Pch172, if you do not understand what the markup in an article does, please do not assume that it needs to be changed. I have undone your most recent changes to the 2015 F1 season article because the use of linebreaks can cause issues for users browsing on a mobile. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 23:16, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Please, Prisonermonkeys, assume some good faith in other user's contributions. The reason why so many users keep elegantly splitting that information over two lines is to reduce the excessive width of the table. I have asked you on the article's talk page whether it's ok if we use your sandbox to edge out your issues with the table. So is that fine with you? T v x1 00:39, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am assuming good faith. I am simply explaining why the changes have been reverted. I am guessing that Pch172 is inserting the line breaks because he is experiencing a table wider than his monitor can display, but that is an issue with his monitor and not the markup. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 01:19, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid your assumptions about my monitor are wrong. The way I see it is that the Mercedes photo off them being world champions is causing the width of the table to appear below an massive part of white space. I put the brakes in to make it aesthetically pleasing to other people who may have similar sized monitored to mine instead of your gigantic ones that you have. Pch172 (talk) 12:34, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's not an issue with the table. That's an issue with the markup in the article lead. You're seeing it that way either because there is a clear template in the lead or because the table is too wide to fit under the images. But if you try to force the table to fit in that white space, you can sometimes create an unintended effect of having the edit function for the table hidden behind the image, making it inaccessible. It's rare, but it can happen.

Please do not make edits on the grounds of aesthetics. Form must always follow function. While it might look better on your monitor, you need to bear in mind that there are many different sizes of monitor available, and you may unintentionally create issues for other editors who have a different monitor.

The problem should correct itself in due course. It may take a few weeks, but once the season starts, the lead will be expanded upon. As more text is added, the white space will shrink, and the table will be gradually pushed down. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 13:04, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prisonermonkeys Tvx1 It's been 2 months since this was that discussed and the white space has not disappeared, which needs sorting out. As far as I'm aware, having the brakes in doesn't affect me when using my mobile. Pch172 (talk) 18:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't affect me either. Prisonermonkeys is currently blocked, so will not be able to reply here. T v x1 18:37, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Formula One season

Hi Pch172. I'm confused: why do you keep adding http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/formula1/26270798 as a reference for Lotus using Mercedes engines in 2016? That (outdated) article says that they will use Renault engines from 2014 to 2018. DH85868993 (talk) 13:28, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lotus' Power Units for 2016

Hi. I noticed that you recently a source to support the entry for Lotus' power units for the 2016 Formula One season. However, your source states that they will use Renault power units for 2016-2018, while the article states they will use Mercedes power units. I'm getting a bit confused as to which it should be now.T v x1 13:30, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pch172. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cuckfield Town F.C. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cuckfield Town F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuckfield Town F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 21:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Formula E season

Template:Formula E season has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:34, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of FIA Masters Historic Formula One Championship for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FIA Masters Historic Formula One Championship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FIA Masters Historic Formula One Championship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

-"Ghost of Dan Gurney" 17:30, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]