User talk:Phil Meltzer

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Phil Meltzer! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 15:47, Wednesday, June 5, 2019 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Phil Meltzer! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 18:42, Wednesday, June 5, 2019 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: QI Macros (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Seraphimblade was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While there are at a glance many sources present, they are almost all either simple name drops or mentions in passing, and largely do not verify the claims to which they are attached (for example, there are five sources cited for "more than 100,000 users", but I can't find where any of those five sources actually list a number of users.)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:QI Macros and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:QI Macros, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 00:43, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Phil Meltzer! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 00:43, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: QI Macros (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam-2727 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a well written article for the most part. You just need a bit more indication of notability here. I'm actually legitimately unsure if this article complies with Wikipedia's notability critiria. Remember that sources -- to indicate notability -- must be independent of the source and be reliable. Some likely sources that could indicate notability are product reviews. Try looking for these next. Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:QI Macros and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:QI Macros, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sam-2727 (talk) 16:07, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: QI Macros (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more external news sources that review the product. Do not just reference websites that provide downloads for it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:QI Macros and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:QI Macros, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:28, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: QI Macros (April 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul W was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Like previous reviewers, I find the sourcing inadequate to establish notability. Excluding the company's own website and PR outputs, most mentions are either fleeting name drops, or come from download websites or blogs (unreliable sources).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:QI Macros and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:QI Macros, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul W (talk) 11:07, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Phil Meltzer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

PhilMess (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I received ZERO compensation for ANY contributions that I made. I understand the reason that I was blocked and will not make any of the types of edits that would result in blocking again. This will be easy as I was never compensated in any way for any edits in the first place. I only intend to make corrections to articles when I come across them and to link related articles that should be linked if they are not already.

Decline reason:

This account is not directly blocked. If you are unable to edit, please exactly follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so. Yamla (talk) 17:23, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, you're not blocked. I suggest you try editing again, and post any message you get telling you you're blocked. PhilKnight (talk) 16:44, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My account is definitely blocked with a message stating "Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing..." and listing the steps necessary to get it unblocked. PM (talk) 16:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phil Meltzer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As per Yamla my account is not directly blocked. Please allow me to make edits again. Thank you. PM (talk) 17:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. You are not giving us enough information to find the block affecting you. You must exactly follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to edit. Yamla (talk) 18:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm at a loss. Here's what I get when I try to make edits:

"This account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages.

The account ‪QI Macros‬ has been blocked by ‪NJA‬ for the following reason(s):

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a ::business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and

Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and

Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text "unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here" at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

"Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text "unblock|reason=Your reason here" at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

This block will not expire.

Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page, as well as email administrators and other editors.

For information on how to proceed, please read the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful.

Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked"

I feel like I have followed these instructions exactly as outlined. Yamla can you or someone else please tell what I'm misunderstanding here? What am I doing differently from these instructions? PM (talk) 18:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: it says "The account ‪QI Macros‬ has been blocked by ‪NJA‬" but I am NOT QI Macros. Why is this showing up? PM (talk) 18:28, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Phil Meltzer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block is to QI Macros but I am NOT QI Macros. PM (talk) 18:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Hopefully the problems won't reoccur. PhilKnight (talk) 18:41, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have disabled the autoblock on QI Macros block. Checkuser confirms you share an IP address. Try editing again. PhilKnight (talk) 18:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, PhilKnight. That appears to have done the trick. PM (talk) 19:06, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]