User talk:Photo Eminency

This is Photo Eminency's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harlan Goldstein (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harlan Goldstein and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 13:13, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Photo Eminency! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 13:13, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pouria Zeraati (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

In order to demonstrate notability, you are required to cite sources where the subject has received significant coverage. Please see WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pouria Zeraati and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 05:52, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barbara Aguiar (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barbara Aguiar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 08:27, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Killing of Aylar Haghi

according to her ?? Xx236 (talk) 08:26, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"According to her family" :) Sorry I written fast! Photo Eminency (talk) 09:17, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Armita Abbasi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armita Abbasi, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armita Abbasi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:JRM2018 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JRM2018. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 18:23, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:JRM2018 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JRM2018. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 18:23, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Photo Eminency (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I carefully read the reasons for blocking my account. I also read WP:GAB completely and understood. User @Elcobbola: and @Girth Summit:, first of all, thank you for protecting Wikimedia. Then hereby I answer your reasons for blocking me as follows: * I encountered "blocked" when I tried to upload a new photo in Wikimedia Common. So first I asked Elcobbola and then based on this message I asked other admins. * Yes, I am a professional photographer (1), (2), and have taken in several major events like ONE Championship, Rajadamnern Stadium , Super Champ Muay Thai, ADCC Submission Fighting World Championship and more. 3, 4. * As I mentioned above, I am a ONE Championship photographer, so it is normal I edit articles related. * I wrote a Draft:Barbara Aguiar article, which according to the WP:NKICK should have been moved in the main space, but unfortunately it was declined. The only page that accurately confirmed the article is notable is Wikipedia:WikiProject_Martial_arts/Kickboxing_task_force. That's why I asked other users to check because I was sure that there was a mistake in the decision of this article. * I may log into Wikimedia with different IP or devices. Because as I mentioned on my user page, I am constantly traveling to shoot events. I entered my location on my user page. I'm on Wikimedia to post my photos. As I mentioned in my user page, I am an activist, I write articles on Wikipedia for the voice of the people of my country. Thank you for supporting my activity. "Woman, Life, Freedom". Photo Eminency (talk) 04:49, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

None of that addresses the reason you were blocked, which was continuing to evade a block from September 2021. You should be appealing from your original account. Looking at your history of sockpuppettry, the standard offer is likely to be your only way forward. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 06:12, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Ohnoitsjamie: Thank you for your reply. I fully understand and respect the concern of you and other admins to maintain the rules of Wikimedia. I wrote the above answer to the 5 reasons for blocking my account to prove this is my only account on Wikipedia and my activity range here goes back to about 2 months. I am a former martial artist and started here after retirement. (1) I hope these reasons will convince you that I have nothing to do with User:JRM2018. If my reasons aren't according to the rules of Wikipedia or don't convince you, please guide me, what steps should I take? Photo Eminency (talk) 08:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not reply inside declined unblock templates. It's pretty obvious behaviorally (in addition to the checkuser evidence) that you are not being forthright. Your next steps would be to pursue the WP:STANDARDOFFER from your original account.

@Ohnoitsjamie: Sorry and thank you for your notice. I am always learning. But honestly, the fact is that I don't have any other account, and I respectfully say that this is the administrator's fault. Can I wait 6 months and make an WP:STANDARDOFFER through this account, which as I said is my only account? I am looking for the correct activity according to Wikipedia guidelines. Unfortunately, I was caught in a situation where I cannot clarify this issue for you. Photo Eminency (talk) 17:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. Please don't ping me again. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:48, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@99of9: Thank you for your response. Please see my reasons for unblocking. Unfortunately, I did not get a favorable response from other admins. I followed Wikipedia's rules completely. Photo Eminency (talk) 06:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]