User talk:Pie Man 360
|
It might be a bit pink for you, but feel free to take a look at my user page and see if there are any ideas you can use on yours. The userpage map will help in navigating the different bits of it. :)
~Kylu (u|t) 01:50, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
I would like to know how my previous edit of the page Crush 40 could be construed as vandalism. Your claim that I added "unhelpful and non-constructive information" to the article is untrue, seeing my edit contained absolutely no new content, only a small fix of a minor spelling error. Is correcting spelling and grammar not allowed here at Wikipedia? 70.176.107.73 15:54, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
In response to above
[edit]I was saying that someone using your IP Address had done an update on the page that replaced the entire history section of Crush 40's page with a continuous string of pure nonsense, a.k.a, a one line string consisting of about 20000 repetitions of "DAVEDAVEDAVEDAVEDAVEDAVEDAVEDAVEDAVE". This, not only being nonsense, also raised the file size to over 1 MB. If you are a user using a proxy, such as AOL, this may have been someone who uses your same proxy or internet access. If that is the case, the message may not be targeted at you, and actually at the real vandal. Thank you. --- PieMan360 23:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]first, there is a whole lotta pink on this page. 2nd, thanks for cleaning up the vandal's work on my page. it was my first time. it was bound to happen eventually. the_undertow talk 02:32, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the vandalism reversion
[edit]Thanks for the vandalism reversion on the Franz Neuländtner article. I really appreciated it. Chris 20:01, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
You guys take this way too seriously
[edit]Rather than being a smart a$$ about the Raheem DeVaughn page, had you taken the time to read it, you would see that the paragraphs repeat 3 times. If you don't believe me, please read the page FIRST before you hit the the "let me email this IP address to let them know they are vandalizing a page". Get off the computer sometime, go live your life outside your home, and not through Wikipedia. Geesh!
Peter John Taylor
[edit]You might want to re-visit your edit and the user comment you left. --Walor 23:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Your sig
[edit]You might have messed up your signature a bit, you need to use the raw signature. Logical2uReview me! 19:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Ah. It's supposed to look like that. I wanted to make a simple easy custom signature, so I used the "fake wikilink" one. Nothing wrong here. --[[User:PieMan360 | UserPage Talk about me!]] 19:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi. you recently reported 71.230.210.181 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) to WP:AIV, noting that they had vandalized after a bv warning. I checked this user's contribs and they have only made one edit total. Could you possibly be thinking of a different user? Natalie 19:38, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Strange. I could have sworn that I saw him/her vandalize twice in VF. My eyes must be playing tricks on me. --[[User:PieMan360 | UserPage Talk about me!]] 19:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 "… You have a Blade of Awe. That means you both play AQ and are a Guardian. That also means I have some major recruiting to do. Please, take a moment to look at this page to see what my Wikiproject is about. If you wish to join go here then scroll to the bottom of that page and click on the link to the Project Page to see what you can do to help. If you have any questions contact me. |
Gandalf's hat/ IP address
[edit]Um...... the User/Ip Address of 68.110.212.59 who "vandalized" my page was me... only not signed in. I forgot to sign in and tried to edit my user page, so please dont block that IP. ...Yeah, why would I vandalize my own page... Please comment on this on my talk page... Here... Gandalf's hat 21:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism warning template
[edit]Pieman, I saw this nice, bright, and very impressive vandalism warning template you used on user talk page of user 4.68.248.2. Could you tell me which one it is? Thanks. -- Semper discipulus 04:55, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks! -- Semper discipulus 00:27, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Jennifer Lynn
[edit]I saw you restored some information on the Wiki page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennifer_Lynn . I am acting in the actresses intrests to remove some private information that was added which was not correct. I am also trying to revert the article as user Alomiakoda had redirected the page which was not needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.37.248.185 (talk • contribs)
AIV
[edit]Hi there, I'm not a sysop but I noticed you reported a username something similar to this: Its OK Vandalizing on April fools day!. I had very recently reported that vandal for the username so it an idea to see if the user is already blocked by going on their contribs and clicking block log at the top and seeing. Thanks and good work with that.Tellyaddict 15:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Klaus_rabe
[edit]Thank you for not deleting my stub-contributions as soon as I got them down on the page. This is not constructive and seems contrary to the intentions of wikipedia as far as I understand it - a little information goes far longer than no information at all, and if you feel there is too little, then invite others to add on ... okay ?`(Klaus rabe 17:59, 1 April 2007 (UTC))
Your signature is broken
[edit]Your signature is broken. I think you may need to check the "use raw signature" box in preferences. —dgiestc 21:32, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
You've been approved to use VandalSniper. Please let me know if you have any problems getting it working. --Chris (talk) 12:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
User pages
[edit]Please do not list user pages for speedy deletion, as you did User:Joebidge. A user may have complete nonsense on their userpage, and it does not matter. Speedy deletion criteria G1 is for article space pages only. See WP:UP for user page guidelines. Thanks KillerChihuahua?!? 21:26, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
RfA
[edit]Hi, I've closed your request for adminship because it had no chance of succeeding. Feel free to try again when you have more experience. John Reaves (talk) 07:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
I think I managed to solve your signature problem. See the HD for details. Regards, Adrian M. H. 20:45, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Pie Man 360. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Tathlin profile.png) was found at the following location: User talk:Pie Man 360. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 09:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
-2007-05-14T09:33:00.000Z-Image:Tathlin_profile.png){kind=link}
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OS2TRAP.PNG
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:OS2TRAP.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Pie Man 360
[edit]User:Pie Man 360, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Pie Man 360 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Pie Man 360 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Ryulong (竜龙) 11:13, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)