User talk:Pioussouls

This is Pioussouls's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox/Oleg Parashchak (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Pioussouls/sandbox/Oleg Parashchak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pioussouls! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox/Oleg Parashchak (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The edits since the last decline have done nothing to establish notability. The whole article is promotional in tone, especially the 'Expertise' section. Possible WP:COI issues

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Pioussouls/sandbox/Oleg Parashchak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 16:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Oleg Parashchak, from its old location at User:Pioussouls/sandbox/Oleg Parashchak. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 16:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pioussouls. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Pioussouls. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Pioussouls|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Thanks for your kind response.

Yes i want to use a paid template. As this person is notable and has various achievements.Kindly guide me further.

Thanks Pioussouls (talk) 17:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will share the details of my client who hired me. It is a paid ones. Pioussouls (talk) 17:36, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The instructions in my above message explain how you can disclose.

Be advised that your draft has been rejected, which typically means it will not be considered further. No amount of editing can confer notability on a topic. If your payment depended on you succeeding in creating an article, I suggest that you return their money. 331dot (talk) 17:47, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oleg Parashchak (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

entirely promotional

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oleg Parashchak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:40, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oleg Parashchak (September 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is simply a promotional piece, with entirely inappropriate language for Wikipedia. Despite repeated attempts you have not seemed to understood WP:NPOV.

Qcne (talk) 17:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is not promotional but a person who is notable and the contribution to the society is appreciable.I am making this page for the admiration no promotional intend.If so kindly mention the specific part. Pioussouls (talk) 17:51, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pioussouls Your article is promotional in nature- it is full of WP:PEACOCK language and is not written from a WP:NEUTRAL point of view.

Despite three declines the language has not improved, which leads me to suspect your only want to promote this person - use Wikipedia to WP:SPAM. This is not permitted.

As such, your article is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia and will not be considered further. Qcne (talk) 19:09, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne kindly can you please check and advise me i have completed all the parameters. But still no progress. Pioussouls (talk) 06:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne moreover, the editors said to add disclosure of "Paid" but i am getting error see this https://imageupload.io/uacKaGYgkllRopP

Can you please guide me in this regard too?

Also i am sharing a source that Oleg is a notable person kindly check this: https://www.crunchbase.com/search/people/field/people/rank_person/811

Waiting for kind response.

Thanks Pioussouls (talk) 06:43, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pioussouls My rejection still stands- this article is not appropriate for the English Wikipedia. This will never become an article in it's current form. Qcne (talk) 10:51, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Qcne !

I hope you are doing great.

Now can you please specify the exact errors??

As you stated this is "not appropriate for the English Wikipedia."

Can you please explain me?

As i have edited and the errors you mentioned previously i edited them.You said earlier the notably factor.You said the person lacks this factor. Now i have provided evidences: Here it is

https://www.crunchbase.com/search/people/field/people/rank_person/811

http://uainsur.com/en/our-news/62996/

http://uainsur.com/en/our-news/63008/

http://uainsur.com/en/our-news/59113/

But still your decision sustains. This is not fair. I kept editing and providing valid sources, i left no stone unturned to meet and remove errors the editors specified.

But now it still the same.

Can you please help me to edit this page and make it acceptable?

I will really grateful to your kind concern.

Waiting for kind response.

Thanks Pioussouls (talk) 11:34, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pioussouls

Crunchbase and the three uainsur.com sources are not ones that provide significant coverage of Oleg. They do not count towards notability as per WP:NPEOPLE.

Now lets go through the sources on your draft one by one:

1) not independent of Oleg, therefore does not pass the WP:NPEOPLE criteria

2) an encyclopaedia article of Ukraine, no mention of Oleg

3) a word definition, no mention of Oleg

4) mentions an award given to Oleg, but this isn't enough to establish notability per WP:NPEOPLE

5) not independent of Oleg, therefore does not pass the WP:NPEOPLE criteria

6) a word definition, no mention of Oleg

7) a topic definition, no mention of Oleg

8) a topic definition, no mention of Oleg

9) a topic definition, no mention of Oleg

10) a link to Wikipedia, not permitted as a source - see WP:CIRCULAR

11) a University home page, no mention of Oleg

12) a home page, no mention of Oleg

13) a home page, no mention of Oleg

14) a home page, no mention of Oleg

15) mentions an award given to Oleg, but this isn't enough to establish notability per WP:NPEOPLE

So how can you believe that this person passes the WP:NPEOPLE criteria when only three sources mention Oleg in your list, none of which count towards establishing notability?

Of course, if you believe I have made a fundamental error in my judgement please do make a post at WP:AFCHELP. Qcne (talk) 11:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Pioussouls, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Pioussouls|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 17:55, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

I am trying to add the paid template but each time it shows error.Kindly see here: https://imageupload.io/uacKaGYgkllRopP

Guide me how to resolve this issue.

Will be grateful.

Thanks Pioussouls (talk) 06:39, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are attempting to use the paid template for article talk pages, not your user page. Please follow the instructions in the message above and place the template described on your user page, User:Pioussouls. 331dot (talk) 06:42, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot kindly check now https://imageupload.io/4COJTiDvI7y8UF0 Pioussouls (talk) 06:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's correct, though you still need to hit "publish". 331dot (talk) 06:49, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot yes done.

What is next now?? Pioussouls (talk) 06:51, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In terms of your draft, nothing, as it has been rejected and will not be considered further. You've attempted to appeal to the reviewer but have not persuaded them. If you truly feel that the reviewer has made a gross error of policy in their review, you can start a discussion at the AFC Help Desk to seek a consensus to permit you a new review, but as someone who frequents that page, you would likely just be wasting your time. My advice is that you abandon efforts on that draft and find a new topic to edit about. Most of us are not paid to be here, and are here in our free time because we want to contribute to this project and believe in it, not because we are being paid. If you are being paid, it's up to you to do the hard work and learn about how things work here before attempting the task of writing a new article, which is the most difficult thing to do here even for regular volunteer editors, it's harder with the conflict of interest of being paid. As I said above, I suggest that you return your client's money(if you've already been paid). 331dot (talk) 06:59, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot i already contacted the editor who rejected my article he previously stated some issues and fixed them. Now i am waiting for his response, hopefully he will look into the matter.

Thanks for your time and kind co-operation. Pioussouls (talk) 07:05, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to wait, of course, but I don't think they are even close to changing their mind. 331dot (talk) 07:06, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Book Your Hunt (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This doesn't look quite right: The draft is called Book Your Hunt; later on, it is referred to as Book Your Hunts; allegedly, it was founded by an Austrian-based Kazakh in the US, but most sources are Russian?! No German-language (Austrian) sources? Multiple primary sources? The text reads in a very non-neutral manner? Sorry, no. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:15, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Johannes Maximilian thanks for your concern.

Regarding the points you have mentioned above, i am going to address one by one:

1- First of all it is not "Book Your Hunts", the right name is " Book Your Hunt" the url is https://www.bookyourhunt.com/

2- Secondly it was Founded in 2015 by ALEKSEI AGAFONOV source:https://about.me/alekseiagafonov

3- Thirdly you have mentioned that the sources are russian, its bilingual you can read sources by change the language option from the very top left side of url.

4- Forthly you have mentioned the text is very non nuetrl, so please specify the exact piece of content. As i have no intention to promote, as it is my personal interest and intention to contribute to wikipedia society.

Waiting for your kind response.

Thanks Pioussouls (talk) 11:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well. I won't go into any unnecessary details, instead, I focus on my points and see what you make of it. There's three things immediately wrong with your draft:

Sources: Wikipedia depicts established knowledge, and thus, it must be based upon secondary sources; your draft is characterised by a lack thereof. This means that there is no indication why Wikipedia would depict the contents or where they originate from.
Plausibility: The draft claims to describe a US firm founded by an Austrian citizen. I would thus expect English or German language sources. The unusually high number of Russian sources either means that the the existing English sources (which should prevail) were not cited, or that the sources are not too reliable (if English sources don't exist in the expected quanity).
NPOV: The text contains multiple sentences that transport a very strong opinion without explaining whose opinion that is or what it's about. For instance, "The company prefers ethical hunting practices and transparency and introduces an innovative way to link outfitters with hunters." – what is an ethical hunting practice? What is the innovative way to link outfitters with hunters? Or the Bait Your Hook section that doesn't cite any external sources. Or the criticism section that includes the following text: "In 2015, BYH was recognized by PHASA with an award for significantly aiding their mission of promoting responsible hunting for sustainable living and livelihoods. However, the organization was compelled to retract our(sic!) sponsorship following a shift in PHASA's leadership and its attempt to reintroduce the contentious canned lion hunting practice." I reckon this does not require any further explaining. In case it does, please see WP:CIR. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 22:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Book Your Hunt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:15, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Book Your Hunt (January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Atlantic306 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Book Your Hunt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Atlantic306 (talk) 22:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 15:48, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Oleg Parashchak

Hello, Pioussouls. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oleg Parashchak, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for the reminder. I appreciate the nudge regarding the Draft:Oleg Parashchak. I'm currently in the process of gathering and creating additional references to strengthen the draft's credibility and meet Wikipedia's notability criteria.

I plan to update the page shortly to ensure it remains active and progresses towards meeting the standards for a main space article. If the page has been deleted in the interim, I'll be sure to request its undeletion so I can continue refining it. Thanks again for your submission guidelines and support. Pioussouls (talk) 12:12, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pioussouls,

You have been indefinitely blocked since Feb. 4th. You won't be working on this draft article again. You should consider filing an unblock request, not what will happen to this draft article. And you won't be unblocked until you disclose who is paying for your work and which articles you are being paid for. Only honesty will ever get you unblocked. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Liz

Thank you for your guidance. I acknowledge the importance of transparency and have already declared "Oleg Parashchak" as a paid contribution on the draft article's information page. To comply with Wikipedia's policies and address the concerns raised, I am willing to delete this draft or take any recommended actions to secure my account's reinstatement.

Please advise on the necessary steps to resolve this issue and regain the ability to contribute within Wikipedia's guidelines. I am committed to full compliance and transparency in all future contributions.

Thank you for considering my situation. Pioussouls (talk) 06:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Book Your Hunt

Hello, Pioussouls. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Book Your Hunt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]