User talk:Pleasureme23

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome Pleasureme23!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 39,393,652 registered editors!
Hello Pleasureme23. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Walter Görlitz, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:
  Introduction to Wikipedia
  The five pillars of Wikipedia
  Editing tutorial
  How to edit a page
  Simplified Manual of Style
  The basics of Wikicode
  How to develop an article
  How to create an article
  Help pages
  What Wikipedia is not
Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
  Do be bold
  Do assume good faith
  Do be civil
  Do keep cool!
  Do maintain a neutral point of view
  Don't spam
  Don't infringe copyright
  Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest
  Don't commit vandalism
  Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
  Ask a question
or you can:
  Get help at the Teahouse
or even:
  Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
  Fight vandalism
  Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome
  Help contribute to articles
  Perform maintenance tasks
           
  Become a member of a project that interests you
  Help design new templates
  Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to:

  • Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
  • Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:04, 1 July 2020 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)[reply]

Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:04, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Corn & Peg, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 00:53, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Overkill (Men at Work song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. SummerPhDv2.0 17:33, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Santa Monica High School, you may be blocked from editing. TJRC (talk) 17:40, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Desert Hills High School (Arizona). ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:07, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:17, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your additions. Please have a look at WP:INTREF for a tutorial. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:18, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Homestead High School (Cupertino, California). Magnolia677 (talk) 18:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for a period of 36 hours for unsourced edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia's hallmark is its user-generated, consensus-based content. Most article updates are uncontroversial, so discussion isn't needed. In cases of disagreements amongst editors, though, there is no choice but to communicate with others. ... If you are changing content (and not simply reverting vandalism) and someone reverts you, you should start a discussion on the talk page if you want to restore your change, following our Bold, Revert, Discuss (BRD) cycle. ... If you are getting multiple complaints on your talk page or on an article talk page about your editing, you are expected to either stop the action that is causing the complaints, or discuss it with the community of editors at the appropriate venue. This could be a formal noticeboard, an article talk page, or on your talk page. Ignoring the complaints is not an option and trying to 'fly under the radar' may eventually result in a block." --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:14, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Corn & Peg, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 21:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jxdn, you may be blocked from editing.

CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 18:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello. Your recent edit to Geneva High School (New York) appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Meters (talk) 20:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gym Class Heroes. Meters (talk) 20:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello. Your recent edit to Colleyville Heritage High School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. You added a band rather than an individual to the list of notable alumni. Bands are not alumni so I reverted your edit. Notable band members who are alumni could be added to the list. Gab4gab (talk) 10:29, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Iann Dior. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 14:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DigiTour Media, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Paul Zimmer, Jim Chapman and Aaron Carpenter. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Valencia High School (Santa Clarita, California). TJRC (talk) 19:48, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nearly all your edits are unsourced; most recently including St. Joseph's Preparatory School, Wellington C. Mepham High School, and Blountstown High School. You've been warned about this repeatedly for almost a year. You are on your way to getting blocked again. TJRC (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And again, PAW Patrol: The Movie, Louis Bell, Horizon High School (Scottsdale, Arizona).
STOP. TJRC (talk) 19:33, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 02:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at PAW Patrol: The Movie, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This has been the third time you have added such unsourced information to the same article, and despite an editor removing content added by you, you continued added such material. The next time you add such information, add a reliable source supporting it. FloorMadeOuttaFloor (Leave me a messageChanges I have made) 15:21, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited PAW Patrol: The Movie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kim Roberts.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reported you.[edit]

Hope this will give you a lesson to stop edit-warring. Have a nice block! Signed, Dinosaur TrexXX33 (chat?) 19:01, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit-warring, and persistently adding unsourced material, despite numerous messages expressing concerns, warnings, and two previous shorter blocks. If you continue to act in the same way it is likely that before long you may be blocked from editing indefinitely. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JBW (talk) 19:40, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at St. Charles West High School, you may be blocked from editing. How many times do we have to tell you not to add unsourced material or non-notable alumni? Meters (talk) 01:58, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And on DinoSquad Meters (talk) 02:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at PAW Patrol: The Movie. TJRC (talk) 19:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Scott Burley (talk) 02:52, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tim Walton (American football), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carver High School.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lockport High School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eugene Young.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 07:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pleasureme23 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I’ve been editing for good things, the things I editing are all true, I know i didn’t sourced those edits. It was a big mistake for me, I’ sorry about what I’ve done. Pleasureme23 (talk) 14:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You would at least need to prove that you can source content. Post an encyclopedic fact here on your talk page, cite a reliable source for it, and make a new unblock request. It would also help if you explained when to source content and what makes a source reliable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:42, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


When last blocked in December 2021, instead of addressing the issues, you removed the notifications. Those removals represent two of only three talk page posts you've ever made. You've been warned many many times about unsourced additions, including warnings that communication is required, and you've never responded to any of them. Why are you only now responding to years of warnings? Why should we believe you are interested in working within policy now? Valereee (talk) 00:06, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because, I promised I won’t add any unsourced additions ever again.

You seem to have tried editing as Farmershire123 ... Graham87 17:51, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here is an example of a sourced edit I made yesterday.

Pleasureme23 (talk) 20:07, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Neither of your two accounts has edited the D'Orsie article.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ "Joe D'Orsie". Pennsylvania House of Representatives Archives. Retrieved 21 January 2023.
  2. ^ "About". Joe D for PA. Archived from the original on December 4, 2022. Retrieved 21 January 2023.