User talk:Pokrajac/Archive 1

Welcome to the Wikipedia[edit]

Here are some links I thought useful:

Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. Wikipedia:About, Wikipedia:Help desk, and Wikipedia:Village pump are also a place to go for answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be Bold!

Sam Spade (talk · contribs) 21:23, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Ceda Jovanovic[edit]

Please take a look at that paragraph at Cedomir Jovanovic. I modified it to make it clear that he was only accused of being part of mafia. I am not sure what did you think was POV about it. The contacts were confirmed by Ceda himself, but actual involvement was denied. --Dejan Cabrilo 16:18, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Pokrajac, I do speak Serbian, but this is English wikipedia after all, and it is reasonable to assume that non-Serbian speakers will read our talk pages at one point or another. I didn't want to be rude or anything. So, what's up? --Dejan Cabrilo 18:01, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

uncredited image[edit]

The image Image:Savabg.JPG that you uploaded on 24 Dec 2004 does not have any information on it's source. Please would you add the appripriate credit and tag as per wikipedia's copyright tagging policy. Thanks, JeremyA 02:32, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Srpska glava[edit]

This is Wikipedia not The Goverment of Serbia--Hipi Zhdripi 21:21, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You probably dont know nothing about content of UN resolution 1244. But, this is de jure situation. De facto should be described inside of document. --M. Pokrajac 21:33, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It s not the truth, it s just a interpretation from the serbian governnment, to tell them popullation, that they are loosing nothing. It´s the same thing, like with UCK. Their point of view, they should put in the article " Republic of Kosovo", but not here.I`ve written an article with the subject "Kosovo and Metohija". Both subjects are one the wrong place here, they can be only in " History of Kosovo "In the article "Kosovo" is just place for present information, not for the past or future. No speculation, no propaganda, just facts .Nowhere you let a place for ACTUELL , CORRECT information from Kosovo. Do you acept UNMIK yes/no?--Hipi Zhdripi 21:44, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, you are wrong. Acording the UN resolution 1244, Kosovo is part of FR Yugoslavia. Since, FRY is now Serbia and Montenegro, Kosovo is in it (and in Serbia, too). Please, read resolution 1244, and do changes in article Kosovo than. Unfortunately, you must respect this situation. UNMIK is ofcourse UN administrating service in Serbian Kosovo still. Perhaps, Kosovo should be independent state in future... It is not now! Just see 2nd page of resolution. Than you shell see the words: Reaffirming the commitment of all Member States to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the other States of the region, as set out in the Helsinki Final Act and annex 2. --M. Pokrajac 21:56, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

See this page! Now, best regards, --M. Pokrajac 21:56, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

S/RES/1244 (1999)

Page 4

(c) Organizing and overseeing the development of provisional institutions

for democratic and autonomous self-government pending a political settlement, including the holding of elections;

(d) Transferring, as these institutions are established, its

administrative responsibilities while overseeing and supporting the consolidation of Kosovo’s local provisional institutions and other peacebuilding activities;

(e) Facilitating a political process designed to determine Kosovo’s future status, taking into account the Rambouillet accords (S/1999/648);
(f) In a final stage, overseeing the transfer of authority from Kosovo’s

provisional institutions to institutions established under a political settlement;

PAST, PRESENT = UNMIK, FUTURE. Do you acept UNMIK yes/no?---Hipi Zhdripi 23:48, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

self-government has no Kosovo Disctrik, ect...??????????????????????--Hipi Zhdripi 23:55, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a prophet ? Wikipedia isn`t a religion-book. I`ll not continue this discussion with you. My friend, you have a problem with UNMIK, not with me. Before you don`t say, that you accept UNMIK, we can`t go on. You aren`t able to accept the present.--Hipi Zhdripi 00:08, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You can`t issue your standards. Once again: Reaffirming the commitment of all Member States to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the other States of the region, as set out in the Helsinki Final Act and annex 2 Sorry. --M. Pokrajac 00:05, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My dear friend, you can`t read English... I wrote: UNMIK is ofcourse UN administrating service in Serbian Kosovo still. Perhaps, Kosovo should be independent state in future... . I accept UNMIK. Everybody accept UNMIK in Serbian Kosovo ofcourse. If you can not understand English, I`ll not gonna discuss whit you. What means "Srpska glava"? --M. Pokrajac 11:56, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo[edit]

Are you sure it is not a content dispute rather than vandalism? (See Wikipedia:Vandalism). I think it would be best to follow the steps at Dispute resolution if you can not form any agreement on the article's talk page. Please request protection if the dispute continues rather than reverting too often. Angela . 13:35, May 2, 2005 (UTC)

Ma nemoj mi pricati, da se desio neki vandalizam u vezi sa Kosovom? Dobrodosao na Vikipediju :)) Nemam ideju sta uraditi, ovo sto Angela predlaze je moguc korak ali covek ne govori bas dobro engleski pa bi tesko islo.

A taj defetizam, "dok se ne ozvaniči nezavisnost Kosova i Metohije", da nisam vise cuo! ;) Nikola 15:21, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Balasevic.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

The image Image:Balasevic.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information.

Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 00:22, May 26, 2005 (UTC)

That would make it non-free. You might want to claim it as fairuse, but that is doubtful. Better to find a free image. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 01:57, May 27, 2005 (UTC)

Image:Zjoksimovic.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

The image Image:Zjoksimovic.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information.

Image:Zcolic2.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

The image Image:Zcolic2.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information.

Serbian portal[edit]

As the amount of material somehow connected with Serbs and Serbia on Wikipedia grows, I think it wouldn't be a bad idea to form a SCG/Serb portal, so that all the articles about famous Serbs, Serb history, the Serb republic etc are more closely interlinked. This would also provide the casual reader with a easy to use encyclopaedia of everything they could wish to know about RS, SCG, the Serb diaspora etc. Јес' да је Србија мала и да је мало Срба али ипак има Палестински портал, Doctor Who портал, зато нема разлога да и ми ово не покренемо. At this stage I'm just gauging the amount of interest out there for this. If you support this idea, and want to help out, then just drop by my talk page -- estavisti 20:02, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: vandalism protections[edit]

Initially I didn't want to protect any pages, but this abuser is really persistent and wastes time. Please voice your opinion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/ARD and Jwalker so that you're on record. We need to show due diligence before banning someone. --Joy [shallot] 13:03, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rakovica's[edit]

The reason why I removed the links "See Rakovica (disambiguation page)" is because it's unlikely that someone will accidentally stumble upon a page called "Rakovica, Bosnia and Herzegovina" (for example) and then be confused because they were looking for some other one. If they just searched for Rakovica they would get to the disambiguation page and this is a non-issue. --Joy [shallot] 23:21, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bg sava-danube.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Bg sava-danube.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Image:Slovaci u Srbiji.jpg[edit]

I noticed that you uploaded this image with no copyright notice. Please go there and add one or it will be tagged for deletion. Thanks! -- Dave C.^{talk | Esperanza} 01:06, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User Categorization[edit]

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Serbia and Montenegro page as living in or being associated with Serbia and Montenegro. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Serbia and Montenegro for instructions. -Alekk 23:12, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Serbs image[edit]

Please see User talk:72.144.150.28. Nikola 00:41, 11 October 2005 (UTC) Please see it again and comment if you have something to say :) Nikola 20:02, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I started the vote on which image should be used at Talk:Serbs#Image vote. Please describe your image and say why do you think it should be used.

Unrelated to this, there is a revert war going on Republika Srpska article. Would you please come to Talk:Republika_Srpska#Latest_POV_problems to check the discussion and give your opinion? Nikola 19:32, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What is your beef with the Serbs images?|Slovaks[edit]

I posted another in the discussion thread. Please explain what is the big problem with these images? The selections are good and I'm graciously accepting peoples' suggestions. More than 4 pictures isnt uncommon on wikipedia. See list of Czechs and list of Georgians. I don't see what's the big deal.

Also, explain to me why you wished to overrepresent the Slovak nationality? Historically they were never very population (under a million in 1880) so it makes no sense why you were so adament about it.

Also, please get rid of that poor image of Slovaks in folk dress....or at least put it on a better page.

Image of Serbs[edit]

Hi. Can you please see Talk:Serbs and discussion about image of Serbs. Antidote has put his image on article. Since his image does not have majority, can you go there and tell him that he is wrong. Best regards. --M. Pokrajac 00:30, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I don't have a strong opinion on this. I would have picked something simpler -- four pictures at most -- but I don't think this is major enough to be worth an argument. -- Jmabel | Talk 00:33, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The image was clearly voted on hastily to stop the edit war that was going on. Little effort or thought was put into the image and in the end, it was left a bad representation. I tried to compromise by just asking for the removal of the Divac picture - as he barely represents anything THAT important in the sports sector of Serbian culture and his image is just squished in poorly - but seeing as I've been ignored (on several talk pages) I just decided to change it myself. I do have support, though certainly elss than in the original vote. Antidote 07:01, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Serbia and Montegro articles[edit]

Hi, I see you're in the category for those Wikipedians from Serbia & Montenegro. I'm trying to create a project whereby seperate articles for just Serbia OR Montenegro are written to an acceptable level, especially considering the possibility that 2006 may see the two nations seperate and become independent states. If that were to occur Wikipedia should have articles written to the standard of other national articles. It would be useful to have the input of Wikipedians living in the area. Please post any views here, not at my talk page. Thank You Grunners 18:24, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Pobednik-kalis.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pobednik-kalis.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by going to "Your contributions" from your user page and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Pak21 14:34, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. However, I have to say that it doesn't look to me like that image is in the public domain: there's a copyright notice on the bottom of the page and I can't see anything stating that the images are reusable in any way (although this is quite possibly because my knowledge of any languages other than English is pathetic...). Could you point me to where the image is specified as being public domain? In the meantime, I've put the source on the page and tagged it as {{nolicense}} instead. --Pak21 10:44, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. However, if the permission is only for use on Wikipedia, the image is definitely not in the public domain (which means anybody can use it for any purpose). Would {{Copyrighted}} be the right tag to use?

Portal Help[edit]

First of all the Serbian Church ties in to what the Serbs are...it may seem dominating at the moment, but that is because that's as far as I have gotten. I would like you to join the portal, please sign and you can help transfer some stuff from Serbian Wikipedia to this portal because my cyrillic is not that good. Thanks Happyman22 00:44, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RFC on User:Antidote[edit]

Hello, I believe this person was responsible for mass voting on Catholic, Jewish and Serbs articles and numerous other disruptions including arbitrarily changing population numbers and removing people from lists dating back to March, see Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Antidote and Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Antidote/Contribution_table and Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Antidote/User_comments. I would appreciate if you could endorse the request for comment at Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Antidote#Other_users_who_endorse_this_summary, Regards, Arniep 15:37, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RFC signature[edit]

I would appreciate if you comment on what dispute you have with me - for I have yet to see you're reasoning. Antidote 19:55, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New Image[edit]

I like your selection of the lady Petrovic - it fits perfectly becasue now we have a religious figure, king, revolutionary, scientist, artist, and writer. I'm wondering if you would prefer this image to the one you put though:

[[Image:NSrbs.JPG|300px]]

It is the same but with a portrait of Petrovic - somewhat of a hat-tip to her being a painter - plus portraits look better. If you don't like it then you can revert it. Antidote 01:07, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ono na tvojoj SH talk page nisam ja napisao. Luka Jačov 15:13, 22 December 2005 (UTC) O, da a komentar na pijaci (očito si na to mislio, sad sam pogledo) je napisao izvjesni Andrej Šalov a ne ja. Luka Jačov 15:26, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Чини ми се да малим википедијама не преостаје ништа друго него да преводи чланке са вечих. Иначе за СХ википедиу предлажем заједнички нови стандард: јекавица, избациванје ије и ћ, кориштинје славенских суфикса -исати умјесто -ирати, предност славенској рјечи (нпр. имена мјесеци) или напросто пустит да људи пишу како желе. Први је прједлог да се створи нови заједнички стандард с којим би ето кренули андерграунд на википедији. Luka Jačov 21:58, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Zašto mi još nisi odgovorio? Luka Jačov 12:08, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Zašto mi ne želiš odgovoriti? Luka Jačov 00:48, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Da al je činjenica da standardni Srpskohrvatski ne postoji, pa pošto se i sam taj pojam danas izbjegava sh wikipedia se može smatrati undergound. U biti ona sama po sebi je alternativa. Luka Jačov 00:57, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Da pa i to sam naveo da svako piše kako 'oče. Dali bi ja mogo pisat svojim pravopisom? Luka Jačov 01:06, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

E to je ono na što ne želim pristat. Pošto su editori sh-wikipedie pobornici srpskohrvatskog jezika zašto ne bi radili na tome da mi prvi usvojimo jedan novi zajednički standard, barem da bude jedna od mogučnosti pisanja na sh-wikipedii. Luka Jačov 01:10, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bio sam ga več prije objasnio. Znači baziran na jekavici, zamjenjivanje ije sa je, ukidanje ć, odnosno on bi se koristio jedino u tekstovima u dijalektu koji ima taj glas (npr. Sjeverna Čakavština), korištenje srpske varijante internacionalizama, hrvatski futur (radit ču) prednost slavenskoj besedi (npr. mjeseci u godini)... Luka Jačov 01:20, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ja sam sad onlajn. Ak mi možeš sad odgovoriti. Luka Jačov 21:53, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dobivam nekako dojam da izbjegavaš replikovati. Luka Jačov 23:48, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Kaqe sad veze ima SCG wikimedia sa sh-vikipedijom? A miloš nije ni lingvista a i nije pobornik srpskohrvatskog jezika tako da i nema smisla sa njim razgovarat oko toga. pa što nije sh-vikipedija presedan sam po sebi, em se piše na dva pisma em ne postoji jedan dogovoreni standard. zašto bi nas uopšte trebalo biti strah napraviti presedan? koristiš li icq? Luka Jačov 15:20, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message[edit]

Hi Marko,

From what I could understand from your message, you told me that there's a Serbian Wikipedia, and invited me to join it, am I right?

Well, I've already done it. At the moment, I'm doing my best to learn the language, so that I can help with the articles about Brazil (I live in Brazil, which means I can give some good contributions there!).

Again, thanks for your message!

Milena 09:42, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Serbophobia[edit]

The title refers of the newspaper article says that to "Serbia Is on Trial" which could be interpreted as Serbia as an institution is on trial and not Serbs as people. Last time I checked Serbia is country of many nations. If there are no further objections I will remove this sentance.

Pokrajac I think this is as clear as it can possibly be. The news article does not exemplify what is claimed or at least the title of the news article is ambigious about if it refers to Serbs as people or Serbia as a country. I don't understand why is this being pushed.

On an additional note this article will get nowhere as long as it tries to pin the blame for Serbophobia to anyone especially more contemporary examples like New York Times.--Dado 04:57, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pokrajac, mozda si u pravu sto se tice odnosa Srbija i Srbi ako se o tome razmislja iz srpske perspektive. Mislim da nisi upucen dovoljno u metodologiju rada NY Times-a i da malo bolje poznajes ove novine ili ih redovnije citas vidio bi da nisu skloni da prave takve lapsuse kao sto se interpretira na clanku Srbofobija. Sam naslov ne govori nista iz americke perspektive jer po njima Srbija nemora biti drzava samo jednog naroda, kao sto ni Amerika nije samo drzava amerikanaca. Siguran sam da naslov kao ni sadrzaj clanka nije imao za cilj da napadne jedan narod vec institucije drzave. Posto ni ja ni ti nemamo taj NYT clanak ni ja ni ti nemozemo dokazati svoje teze ali ipak nedokazana analiza teksta se trenutno nalazi na clanku o Srbofobiji sto ne cini taj clanak neutralnim. --Dado 21:05, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ZlatiborZimi.jpg has been listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:ZlatiborZimi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

--Romeo Bravo 02:46, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

See comment on Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2005 December 26 --Romeo Bravo 15:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Antidote and User:Zordrac/Poetlister[edit]

I note that you are involved in the above RfC. Please see my sub page for evidence of the entirety of the dispute and related issues. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 12:50, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Help please![edit]

hi! I'm sorry, Can you help me with this? I need to know what this means: tvoj rju zorak I think it is an insult, haha. thanx.

I dont know what that means. Tvoj is yours, bud other words I do not understand. --M. Pokrajac 21:01, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

thank you anyway. and do you, by any chance know what this means?

smješten na dodiru južne Bukovice i Ravnih Kotara, u sjevernoj Dalmaciji, dio Zadarske županije. Zbog svog zemljopisnog položaja; ini važno prometno sjecište cestovnih pravaca Zadar - Knin, Biograd - Obrovac, Novigrad - Šibenik, te željezni; kog pravca Zadar - Knin. Od gospodarskih grana razvijena je poljoprivreda (sto;arstvo, ratarstvo, vo; arstvo i vinogradarstvo), prerada grož; a, eksploatacija plo;astog kamena, obu; arska i metalna industrija.

That's some place in Croatia. --M. Pokrajac 23:30, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The whole paragraph is? How old are you? I'm 20. thnx 4 your patience by the way.

Religije i Obraz[edit]

Sto se tice Obraza, to sam primio k znanju i sklonio sam POV tag tamo (ne vidim sta je u onom tekstu POV). --millosh (talk (sr:)) 03:49, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sto se tice religijskih tema, dogovor je da budu obradjene po znacaju za nase kulturne prostore: prvo srpsko pravoslavlje, onda islam, potom katolicanstvo, pa protestantizam i judaizam. To bi, svakako, trebalo bolje srediti, a i ti bi se mogao ukljuciti u to. Uzmimo, stvarno bi trebalo cim pre srediti islamske praznike. Vikipedija je i kulturni projekat, a religije su deo kulture. --millosh (talk (sr:)) 03:49, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Obraz[edit]

Na mom je watchlistu, hvala ti. Jebiga, ljudi valjda imaju neke refleksne nagone po tom pitanju, a i uz najvise maste ne vidim sta je POV oko toga. U svakom slucaju, kako taj clanak bude rastao, treba paziti na svaku rec. --dcabrilo 03:38, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Problemi?[edit]

Kakve to probleme imate na sr wiki? :D HolyRomanEmperor 17:01, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Boca Juniors[edit]

Pardon, znam da je u i ne v, ali još malo mešam slovenski i srpski (živim u Sloveniji, ali materni jezik mi je spanjolski). Ajd, se vidimo. Mariano(t/c) 17:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalizam[edit]

E, izvini sto ti nisam odmah prileteo u pomoc, tek sam sad pri kompjuteru. Casna pionirska rec, pritrcacu u pomoc na sh wikipediji, da pokusamo da sprecimo takve gluposti. --dcabrilo 21:20, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reci mi, kako je Јованвб postao administrator? --dcabrilo 22:04, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Javi mi se na ICQ: 7366253 (ili dodji na IRC #wikipedia, user Pechorin) --dcabrilo 22:21, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sh.wiki[edit]

Don't let some fucking nationalist vandals close it down. Let me know if I can help in any way. Just a shame I don't speak BCSMxyZ ;) - FrancisTyers 00:06, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure, I hope we pwn these deletionists! Babajobu 23:32, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hvala na informacji oko sh, ali nazalost nemam vremena za vise wikipedia od engleske i svedske. A kad imadnem, sumljam da cu moc dodat ista vazno jer nemam iskustva pisati (s)-(h). Foant 19:53, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History of Croatian Serbs[edit]

Don't worry, my friend; it'll grow. --HolyRomanEmperor 11:46, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pokrajac,

I am sorry for changing your edit. I am new to wikipedia discussion, so I apologize. --adam300 03:25, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Goli_mapa.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Goli_mapa.JPG. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 14:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Goli_otok_zatvor.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Goli_otok_zatvor.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 18:09, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Grbrakov.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Grbrakov.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 10:12, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Hr-csp05.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr-csp05.gif. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 05:08, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Poki[edit]

Koliko te placaju da brukas Srbiju na engleskoj Wikipediji,petokolonasu izdajnicki,slugo prodana,nesrecnice otuzni,provincijalcu potkupljeni,jado jaloviDzoni 16:16, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

da, pokrajche, petokolonashu i prodana dusho ;) hvala na podrshci na sr wiki.. i pazi na ovog potpisanog iznad mene, mozhda je pripadnik ozne.. a ozna sve dozna! ;)

SM (ne slobodan miloshevic ;)

opet ja.. kasno videh da je glasanje u toku da SM chlanak bude izabran.. moje mishljenje o chlanku, o sobi o kojoj se pishe i o autoru koji toliko gura da taj chlanak bude izabran verovatno si do sada shvatio kakvo je. Ne znam koliko bi moj glas protiv imao tezhinu (ja nemam nikakav cin na sr. wiki - administratorski, chinovnichki, birokratski, itd itd.. tj. nisam nikad ni imala). Necu da se petljam trenutno u glasanje, jer pishem naveliko chlanak o Srebrenici, za koji znam, i da ako me i opet dochekaju na nozh, nece imati, osim naravno srpskog ponosa, da smaraju i o Naseru Oricu, tek toliko da zadovoljim iste.. Ja ako bih sada i stavila "Protiv" mozhesh misliti kakvu ce reakciju to da izazove kod dotichnog autora chlanka..

P.S. Znash li ko je Nikola Smolenski?

Svetlana Miljkovic 19:45, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

130.111.248.43 05:43, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glas[edit]

Ej pa nema te neš na icq-u u zadnje vrjeme:). ajd molim te samo mi glas ovdje [[1]]. Čujemo se;)! Luka Jačov 19:00, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Obrgrb.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Obrgrb.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:06, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hvala za...[edit]

...priznanje! Ovaj hiatus sa wiki na mesec dva cu da iskoristim u spremanju ispita, ali i u spremanju chlanka o srebrenici. Par ljudi preko mejla sa sr.wiki su me uputili na pravu stranu u pogledu dokumentacije i korischenju izvrshnih presuda, te cu imati chime da potkrepim i chlanak i sebe. Kad ga zavrshim, poslacu ti ga ili na mejl, ili vec nekako, pa cesh moci da ga prochitash i pomognesh mi u dopunjavanju istog.. Hvala na ponudi pri pisanju!

Svetlana Miljkovic 23:51, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks![edit]

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Belgrade was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Posted by (^'-')^ Covington 07:07, 1 May 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the the AID Maintenance Team[reply]

RE: SFRJ Shablon[edit]

Sto su ga obrisali? Ko ga je obrisao? Hajde da napravimo novi, slazem se, ja ne znam proceduru ali uputi me na pravu stranu i radicu sta treba. --Bora Nesic 18:44, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zdravo prijatelju! Obavjesti to i Hurricane Angela jer on je napravio šablon. Inače on je zaboravio naš jezik tako da mu se obratiš na engleskom. Pozdrav! Luka Jačov 08:37, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

EU lives, but Yugoslavia is dead and Montenegro will be independent, Kosovo also (with no division)[edit]

You say: "This user supports the European Union". That is right, but "This user supports the division of Kosovo" is not realistic, because Kosovo will be an independent state (of course with respect on minorities like Serbs).
Also Your sentence: "This user supports the peaceful and democratic reunification of Yugoslavia" is odd, because (second) Yugoslavia was same kind of state like the Soviet Union: communist dictatorship. Nobody wants Greater Serbia with war criminals Radovan Karadziċ and Ratko Mladiċ. On the contrary, soon the last mark of former Yugoslavia will lose, on account of the referendum of independent Montenegro.
Yours Sincerely, --PKo 14:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Montenegrin language[edit]

Although You have Serbian as Your native language, You must respect that Montenegrins speak Montenegrin language. Please, look at the official website of the Government of the Republic of Montenegro. Montenegro is not any more Serbian colony.
Yours Sincerely, --PKo 17:08, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Density[edit]

I'm using the figures already in the site. Why are you protesting? If you think the current density should stay then you have to include Kosovo in the population and the area. Take out your calculator and verify: 7.498.001/77.626 = 96,59 /FunkyFly.talk_ 21:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crna Gora[edit]

Heh, cek, jos nije sve gotovo. Nemoj pre rano uskakati. ;) --HolyRomanEmperor 15:31, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nikola Tesla[edit]

The Nikola Tesla article is being randomly vandalized (or so it seems) by the removal of information by random. Now everyone is confusing eachother and reverting back to the vandalized version. Please step in and help me maintain the original. After that is done we can make any needed changes (like POV) 72.144.60.85 18:40, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yugoslavia = Greater Serbia[edit]

"Yugoslavia is a syntagma for Great Serbian hegemony", says sociologist Željko Rutović.
Yugoslavia is dead, hurrah for independent, sovereign and democratic Serbia, hurrah for independent, sovereign and democratic Montenegro and also hurrah for independent, sovereign and democratic Kosovo. I wish these three free republics will be soon members of European Union and Nato.
Sincerely, --PKo 00:47, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CG Wikipedia[edit]

Hey Pokrajac, there is currently a vote for a version of Wikipedia in Montenegrin. If you want to vote, go to meta:Requests for new languages. There you can vote. Ask your friends on Wikipedia (if you have any) who haven't voted to vote. Thanks. Crna Gora ^{(Talk/Contribs/Edit Count)} 06:09, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Serbia[edit]

I removed your football-related comment from the talk page. Please discuss football in, for example, one of the websites in http://www.google.com/search?q=football+forum . Thank you. --HJV 02:54, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes[edit]

Some of your userboxes are divisive and possibly inflammatory. They have nothing to do with the spirit of wikipedia. Please remove them. TheCooler

The Kosovo one may be opposed by Albanians and by reading further up your Yugoslavia box is opposed by someone else who thinks it is a call for greater Serbia. I'm not commenting on your political views but just want you to reflect on whether people will judge you for these boxes instead of your work as a result. It creates divisiviness and "sides". Thanks, TheCooler

Thank you. TheCooler 20:24, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WPFY has a new look![edit]

Check out WP:FY. If you wish, you can add {{WPFY}} to your user or talk page to keep in touch with the project. Zocky | picture popups 17:51, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Orthodox-Church-in-Banja-Luka.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Orthodox-Church-in-Banja-Luka.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:05, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Slika[edit]

E izvini, ali ja se jako slabo razumem u te licence za slike. Jedino što znam je da slike čiji sam ja autor označim sa PD-self, a u drugo se baš ne razumem. Pitaj Braneta sa sr Vikipedije da ti pomogne, on se tamo bavi tim licencama. PANONIAN (talk) 23:46, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Slika[edit]

Pogledao sam sliku, ali ne vidim kako je fair use. Zapravo, travelblog kaže:

All media you add to TravelBlog remains the property of the copyright holder. No title of ownership at any time passes to or is implied to pass to TravelBlog.

Dakle, moraš da kontaktiraš autora fotke, i da vidiš da li dopušta, ali nema osnova za fair use. --dcabrilo 18:01, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

smajli[edit]

 :) - za komentar na sr. wiki..

posle poduzheg vremena svratih da vidim shta ima, pa imadoh shta i da vidim.. ti mora da imash zhivce od chelika - a to je za svaku pohvalu! :)

Svetlana Miljkovic 19:33, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oprosti...[edit]

There was an incident with my old account. (hi-jacking, long story, I'm trying to retreive it). Could you re-introduce me please with that picture's problem? --HRE 16:13, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing the link[edit]

Would you be so kind to explain why do you keep removing link to www.krstarica.com website in Serbia topic? This site is one of the leading sites in Serbia.

Manp 09:45, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir,

As I understood and it is public knowledge that Wikipedia is objective, not religiously nor nationally oriented international site.

As I am informed, no personal or religious beliefs are supposed to be expressed through this site.

Your qualifications on website B92 could be your personal belief and view which is not corresponding to real true fact. You have asked me to quote source and then you have intentionally removed it, so you can promote your favorite site (B92).

Please stop using superlatives, using claims and read all Wikipedia’s editor guidelines. You should rely on objective criteria and not on personal indoctrinations or emotional beliefs.

Manp 08:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moldavia[edit]

As a Bavarian is a German, a Sicilian is an Italian, the same a Moldavian is a Romanian. I am a Moldavian, but I belong to Romanian nation. The union between Moldavia and Walachia was made by a Moldavian Prince: Alexandru Ioan Cuza. So stop telling lies about us, Moldavians! Dacodava

Does not exist a Moldavian language as you voted for wikipedia in moldavian. Moldavian language was invented by soviets. We Moldavians speak Romanian and we made Romania as state by Moldavian Prince Alexandru Ioan Cuza who united Moldavia and Walachia! Dacodava
- If you do not care, see your own problems and do not bother us with your soviet propaganda! Dacodava

Image tagging for Image:Canton10_Herzeg_Bosnia.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Canton10_Herzeg_Bosnia.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:52, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Branko's bridge[edit]

I don't think that Branko's bridge should be on the Branko Ćopić page since it wasn't named after Branko Ćopić. It was called Branko's bridge even before he committed suicide. --Dijxtra 17:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. Well, a friend of mine explained to me that the bridge was named after Brankova street which goes to the bride, and that he remembers the street being called Brankova as early as WWII. Also, this weekend I was in Belgrade and User:Zocky or User:Dcabrilo (can't remember which one of them) explained to me that it was called that way before Branko committed suicide and that the fama that the bridge was named after Ćopić is a urban myth. But, of course, I'm always open for sources claiming otherwise. --Dijxtra 18:46, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cuo sam i ja takvu pricu. Cak sam prvo cuo pricu da se Ćopić bacio s tog mosta koji se prvo zvao Savski most (postoji i sala: "kad mu je svega bilo dosta, Branko se bacio sa Savskoga mosta"), pa je preimenovan u Brankov most, pa zato Beograd nema Savskog mosta nego samo "Stari Savski most" (nema "Obicni Savski most" ili "Novi Savski most"). No, onda mi je prijatelj reko da se Copic: a) nije bacio u Savu vec se sa mosta bacio na betonski plato ispod mosta, b) da se most zvao Brankov jos od kad je sagradjen, kad je u WWII srusen stari most na tom mjestu. Zasto se zove bas "Brankov" i po kojem Branku, nitko mi nije znao reci. Uglavnom, cuo sam svasta o tom mostu i zbilja bi me zanimalo da se utvrdi prava istina... Ima li u Beogradu neki muzej grada Beograda ili nesto slicno gdje bi se mogao naci neki sumanuti historicar koji zna sve o Beogradu? --Dijxtra 19:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ma, je, cuo sam sta si rekao, al sam kontao da ces se ti pozabaviti time obzirom da si ti dodao referencu na Brankov most, a i tecniji si u Srpskom ;-) --Dijxtra 22:46, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{User yugoslav reunification}}[edit]

I see that you have redlinked template on your userpage. So, I undeleted the template and moved it to your userspace: {{User:Pokrajac/User yugoslav reunification}}. Now you can notify people listed here that the template has been moved and fix their userpages. If I made an error and you don't want the userbox in your userspace, let me know and I'll delete it. --Dijxtra 22:54, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]