Jump to content

User talk:Polly Phoenix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Polly Phoenix! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 00:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

May 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://www.doctorparnassus.blogspot.com/, http://www.doctorparnassus.blogspot.com/ (redirect from http://www.doctorparnassus.blogspot.com/)). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Amanda de Cadenet, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Amanda de Cadenet was changed by Polly Phoenix (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-06-13T03:52:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:52, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Amanda de Cadenet. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 03:59, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

[edit]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Word (TV series), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. magnius (talk) 12:45, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to The Hunger (TV series), you will be blocked from editing. magnius (talk) 12:47, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Four Rooms. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. magnius (talk) 12:50, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. magnius (talk) 12:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Amanda de Cadenet, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. magnius (talk) 02:36, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit-warring, disruptive editing at Amanda de Cadenet and related articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Abecedare (talk) 02:48, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Courtney Love, you will be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Amanda de Cadenet, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. magnius (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

[edit]

Discussion concerning you at AN/I

[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at WP:ANI regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Polly Phoenix and the BLP Amanda de Cadenet. If you have anything to say, you can say it below here. —JohnCD (talk) 20:36, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at Amanda de Cadenet. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 21:00, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]