User talk:Polsygol

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hi! I created a page for the rapper Zico on June 12, and while the Talk page is still there (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Zico), when I click on the link to the project page, it tells me that the project does not exist. I looked through the deletion log and can't seem to find it there, and it's not up on Wikipedia, so I'm wondering what happened to it--maybe it got moved someplace weird by mistake? I'd appreciate your help. Thank you! Polsygol (talk) 20:43, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Polsygol[reply]

Hi Polsygol. Articles for Creation pages are created in the "Wikipedia talk" namespace, not in the "Wikipedia" namespace. Don't worry—it's in the right place. There isn't supposed to be a corresponding Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Zico page. I see someone added the {{WPAFC}} template, but that's not supposed to be added to pages until after they've been accepted. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 21:09, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Block B/BASTARZ

Hi, I was wondering if you normally work on the Block B page? I see that you have recently and I was wondering for your input.. I left a message on the talk page asking people whether or not that they think BASTARZ could have their own page. Technically they can.. but no one has ever answered and I was wondering what you would think? I would do so myself but I don't really follow Block B or BASTARZ 100% Alicia leo86 (talk) 03:21, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Alicia leo86:Hi! Gee, I hope I'm doing this right--I haven't tried this before. To answer your question: Yes, I do usually try to keep the Block B stuff up to date (and minus hate).

My feeling is that a BASTARZ page is maybe a little unnecessary? They typically brand themselves as Block B's BASTARZ, and they don't try to market themselves as separate from the larger group (other Block B members will appear at promotional events and the like). A lot of BASTARZ stuff winds up on P.O's page, anyway, since he's been so involved with writing and production.

On the other hand, if you think the Block B page is getting too long and unwieldy, then cutting out the BASTARZ stuff and putting it into its own article makes total sense, since they do perform on their own. I really only work on Block B, so I'm not experienced enough as a Wikipedia editor to make that kind of judgement.

We're also maybe getting to the point where U-Kwon should have his own article? Polsygol (talk) 00:33, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Polsygol: Hey there, I think you did alright. I must admit I'm not really sure either when VIXX's unit debuted last year I just went ahead and made their VIXX LR page and it seems accepted so far. Most subunits don't market them as separate from their main groups so I guess its normal to think that subunits can have their own page especially if you want to shed light on that particular unit and if they have more than one release and perform on their own like Girls' Generation-TTS and Super Junior subunits do and perhaps if they are notable. I think Bastarz could definitely qualify. But since you feel it may be unnecessary there may be no need? and you wouldn't want to give yourself more editing work than you have to? I think it would be your choice, you know Block B and Bastarz more than I do. Alicia leo86 (talk) 08:39, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Alicia leo86:Well, given the examples you list, I think it probably is worth doing. It sounds like they intend to continue with Bastarz, so it would get kind of ridiculous if they keep doing comebacks and start touring but don't have their own page. Polsygol (talk) 23:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Polsygol[reply]

@Polsygol: Oh, I agree. lol Would you like me to start the page off for you, or would you like to try it? :) Alicia leo86 (talk) 08:19, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Alicia leo86: It sounds like you've got a lot more experience than me--would you mind starting it?Polsygol (talk) 04:49, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Polsygol[reply]

@Polsygol: I wouldn't mind really but you could set it up like I did with VIXX LR, work on it in your sandbox first. I think it's pretty straight-forward. :) Alicia leo86 (talk) 08:48, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Alicia leo86:OK, I've got it in my sandbox--can you look at it there?Polsygol (talk) 04:29, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Polsygol[reply]

@Polsygol: Looks great :D All you need now is the references and external links sections and you're set. Alicia leo86 (talk) 04:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Alicia leo86: OK, that's done--I don't really understand the "V T E" boxes, so I just let those go.Polsygol (talk) 04:30, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Polsygol[reply]

@Polsygol: They are for the navigation between pages. When you are ready go to you can make the new page. Alicia leo86 (talk) 08:37, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Alicia leo86: It's submitted! Thanks for your help! Polsygol (talk) 22:54, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Polsygol[reply]

@Polsygol: You did well. You're welcome. Also, just so you know I've deleted the Bastarz disocgraphy and awards from the Block B pages so its only on Bastarz. There's no need for it to be listed twice. Alicia leo86 (talk) 12:04, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BASTARZ has been accepted

BASTARZ, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 06:19, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Polsygol. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 22 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Zico (rapper) page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Korean Music Festival

added a link pointing to Lee Eun-mi

P. O

added a link pointing to TVN

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Bastarz

Hi, I'm Atlantic306. Polsygol, thanks for creating Bastarz!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi, alkpop and soompi are considered unreliable sources by wikipedia so please replace them with other references where possible such as newspapers or mags, thanks

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Atlantic306 (talk) 00:35, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

Hey there! I’m Alexanderlee, and I’ve noticed that in a few of your recent edits you’ve cited Soompi as a source for the information that you’ve added. Please refrain from citing websites such as Soompi and Allkpop, those websites are not considered reliable. Articles containing Soompi and Allkpop sources should have the sources replaced with reliable sources, although this is going to take some time to complete. You can take a look through WP:KO/RS for a list of reliable sources. Thanks. Alexanderlee (talk) 23:13, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaehyo (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eyesnore was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Jaehyo instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jaehyo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eye snore 20:57, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Polsygol, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eye snore 20:57, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Polsygol. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jaehyo concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jaehyo, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jaehyo

Hello, Polsygol. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jaehyo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 12:12, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Polsygol. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]