User talk:Post Falls Man

Please inform me of any comments or complaints.

Welcome!

Hello, Post Falls Man, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Also, I notice your contributions are made without citing any references nor sources. Please see WP:V for more 222.153.162.182 05:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rimmington

This was an article about a non-notable feature of Runescape. It might be better off in a Runescape Wiki rather than this online encyclopedia. (aeropagitica) (talk) 05:55, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Micronation of Gemnoviag

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Micronation of Gemnoviag. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Please see WP:NOT, WP:N, and WP:V. NawlinWiki 00:14, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Royal family. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 08:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. - Lucky 6.9 08:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Your modification of the article on Planets is noted. ~~

More vandalism

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Republic of Gemnoviag, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to 1869, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to July 14, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

FYI, I have corrected your vandalism to 1869 and July 14, and have nominated Republic of Gemnoviag for deletion. Do not portray obvious fiction as reality on Wikipedia. PubliusFL 17:08, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gemnoviag

On my talk page, you stated: Gemnoviag is a nation in the middle of Europe it is mensioned in the Liechtenstein Web-Site in german aka "www.liechtenstein.li" And has close ties with the Austrian government which was mensioned once in 1958 in the Austrian news paper possibly still on record in the Austrian Database of news of past importance no website is currently known by me.. but you get the message you should look farther into your research by looking up more "worldly" information. You don't know everything and neither does Google or Yahoo or any other main search base. You're not going to fool anyone that easily. Google Scholar, Google Books, and Google News all give zero results for Gemnoviag. None of these are English-only resources. A search for Gemnoviag on the site you referred to (the Liechtenstein site) gives the result "Es wurden keine Dokumente gefunden." That means "there were no documents found." As the creator of the article, it is your responsibility to back it up with reliable, verifiable sources, or to stop making the claims. PubliusFL 21:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you are Prince of Gemnoviag, you ought to know what reliable sources are out there to document your principality, eh? Doesn't it seem a little implausible that a resident of Post Falls would be a ruling European prince? PubliusFL 00:44, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid you're not fooling anyone, and if you persist in attempting to perpetuate an obvious hoax, as you did with your latest edits to Republic of Gemnoviag (restricted government site?), I am likely to seek admin intervention. PubliusFL 01:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Colonization of Pluto

Please don't remove the "unreferenced" tag - it serves to alert editors that an article needs some form of citation in order to support the text. This shouldn't be interpreted as a critique of the subject, only as a notice to ensure that deficiencies are addressed in a timely fashion. --Ckatz^chat _spy 01:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have to provide proof that the material in the article is true, and verifiable. That means supplying links to sources - books, articles, websites - that fit under Wikipedia's guidelines for citations. I don't know what web site you're referring to (as it's not listed in the article) but generally speaking it has to be a reputable source, not a blog or a personal page. Hope this helps. --Ckatz^chat _spy 01:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re-creation of Gemnoviag

A tag has been placed on Gemnoviag, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please do not keep recreating pages in violation of Wikipedia's policies. -- PubliusFL 07:27, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to create inappropriate pages such as Gemnoviag, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 20:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's all one big 'Gemel coin' to me, long live Gemnoviag! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.250.155 (talk) 20:12, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Liechtenstein has 100 (Germanic)Gemnoviag Gemel coins, I know, I bought them all and stashed them there! Long live the Gemel!

Image copyright problem with Image:Gemnoviag in 2007.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Gemnoviag in 2007.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 14:10, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Gemnoviag 2007.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Gemnoviag 2007.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 14:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Kylie X.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi Post Falls Man!
We thank you for uploading Image:Kylie X.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:46, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jaden Rosencrans

I have nominated Jaden Rosencrans, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaden Rosencrans. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? PubliusFL (talk) 16:28, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of XConformity

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rob Banzai (talk) 23:21, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had to delete this article, Post Falls Man. The article is just an advertisement and has to go. - Richard Cavell (talk) 01:21, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kellogg

Please read United States metropolitan area to understand what a metropolitan area in Idaho and the rest of the United States is, and consult Idaho census statistical areas to see Shoshone County's listing relative to metro areas. Nyttend (talk) 12:38, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lindsay Lohan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 22:46, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Jenncuneta.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Jenncuneta.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. kollision (talk) 07:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

The recent edit you made has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. kollision (talk) 10:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cccover.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cccover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:07, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jadenrosen.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jadenrosen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:37, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bwcover.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bwcover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gimmore.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gimmore.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Gemnoviag Flag.jpg

The file File:Gemnoviag Flag.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

very low quality and not used anywhere

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]