Jump to content

User talk:Pranjaljha121

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Pranjaljha121, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Pranjaljha121, good luck, and have fun. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 16:02, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Renewal6. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to William James Sidis have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Renewal6 (talk) 11:16, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at William James Sidis. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- LemonSlushie 🍋 (talk) (edits) 11:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

oh... I am really really sorry for this. I thought it would be visible to me only Pranjaljha121 (talk) 11:17, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2023 Cricket World Cup final, you may be blocked from editing. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:20, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at History of cricket. Tube·of·Light 12:51, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DMacks (talk) 10:19, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for using the Unblock Ticket Request System. I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. This requires greater discussion than is possible via UTRS. Please concisely and clearly describe how your editing merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 

. Best -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:37, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal for unblocking my Wikemedia I'd

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pranjaljha121 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Administrator, I am writing to request the unblocking of my account on this Wikimedia project. I understand that my account was previously blocked due to a violation of the site's policies, and I apologize for any inconvenience caused. To prevent future issues, I have reviewed the site's guidelines and will make every effort to adhere to them in the future. I have also deleted any off-Wiki personally identifying information from my user talk page, as you have requested. I would greatly appreciate your consideration in this matter, and I assure you that I will be a responsible and contributing member of this community moving forward. Thank you for your time and understanding. Sincere, lyPra

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:06, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Appeal for unblocking my Wikemedia I'd

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pranjaljha121 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Wikepedia Administrators, I am writing to sincerely apologize for any actions I may have taken that led to the blocking of my account on Wikepedia. I understand that my previous edits did not meet the site's standards and guidelines, and I take full responsibility for any mistakes I made. As a committed member of the Wikepedia community, I am eager to continue contributing to this valuable resource. I assure you that I will be more diligent in adhering to the site's policies and guidelines moving forward. I would like to appeal to you to unblock my account and allow me the opportunity to help provide accurate and up-to-date information on various topics. I am confident that my knowledge and expertise in these areas will be beneficial to the Wikepedia community. Thank you for your consideration, and I look forward to working with you all again soon. Sincerely, Pranjal

Decline reason:

Chatbot generated unblock requests will not be considered. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:08, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pranjaljha121 (talk) 12:14, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal for unblocking my Wikimedia id

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pranjaljha121 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Administrator, I am writing to request the unblocking of my account on this Wikimedia project. I understand that my account was previously blocked due to a violation of the site's policies, and I apologize for any inconvenience caused. To prevent future issues, I have reviewed the site's guidelines and will make every effort to adhere to them in the future. I have also deleted any off-Wiki personally identifying information from my user talk page, as you have requested. I would greatly appreciate your consideration in this matter, and I assure you that I will be a responsible and contributing member of this community moving forward. Thank you for your time and understanding. Sincere, lyPra

Pranjaljha121 (talk) 11:01, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Close as unresponsive. You may make a new request when and if you wish to respond to the questions below. 331dot (talk) 09:00, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pranjaljha121, be more specific. Which policy did you violate? Your appeals show no comprehension of any details. If you cannot engage with the process in a more meaningful way it is probable that your access to this talk page will be revoked. Cabayi (talk) 11:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) Actually Someone else had access to my Wikipedia account and they spread some false information through it and it all got implied on me... As it was my responsibility to access my account,I accept my fault and ask all administrators to forgive me and give me one last chance to prove my worth. Hope you all accept my apology. Afterwards I will be responsible for each and every act that will be done from this account.

I guess my question would be why someone else would hijack your Wikipedia account to insert your name into random articles. Considering that the edits from this alleged hijacker make up the vast majority of edits from this account, it seems odd to only now, in your fourth unblock request, claim a third party hijacked your account. If your account was WP:COMPROMISED, there's a high bar to get unblocked. Can you give a more detailed timeline of who hijacked your account and how and the series of events that led you to recover your account and post an unblock request nearly immediately after the alleged hijacker made their last edit? CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:35, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]