User talk:PunishedRottweilerAppreciator

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Draft:Sergei Sergeiivich Oldenburg, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 15:19, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Dyczkowski (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:ANYBIO, WP:PROF and WP:AUTHOR) but presently does not. As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see referencing for beginners or the article Easier Referencing for Beginners. The draft requires reliable sources, which I'm sure must exist, but the subject's own site does not count towards notability, nor do blogs or the Docslib site. Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements then resubmit the page and ping me and I would be happy to reassess. As I said, I do think this draft has potential so please do persevere!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Dyczkowski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 21:47, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PunishedRottweilerAppreciator! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cabrils (talk) 21:47, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Dyczkowski (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by InterstellarGamer12321 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is still too much unsourced information in this WP:BLP article. More reliable, independent sources should be added or the unreferenced content should be removed. The article likely passes notability guidelines so once more reliable references are added it will be safe to resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Dyczkowski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 10:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of rulers of Gujarat moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of rulers of Gujarat. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:36, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sergei Sergeiivich Oldenburg (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more than just the one source to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sergei Sergeiivich Oldenburg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thakur Gadadhar Singh has been accepted

Thakur Gadadhar Singh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Satdeep Gill (talk • contribs 22:41, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited René-Marie Madec, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corsair. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Other accounts

As always, WP:AGF is important when operating in Wikipedia which is why I wanted to come here and discuss first. I am hoping you can provide some clarity for me. You created your account in 2023 and now have about 150 edits. Nothing wrong with that and I am glad you are here contributing. When I see the edit history of J. Sai Deepak, I also see accounts (Reshmamohan007, Yourchiragpandit, Param2023, Nd.sheela, Dsrprj, and an IP editor) created in 2023 and all working on the same page. Are you related to these accounts in anyway, either using multiple accounts or know the people operating these accounts? CNMall41 (talk) 17:21, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the message and engaging in good faith. Yes, my account was created in 2023 and I have about 150 edits now because there were and partially continue to be many errors & gaps in information especially in articles on notable Indian people or events. I am related to these accounts, nor do I know of the people using them nor am I using multiple accounts. In fact, I'm hearing of these accounts for the first time because I never bothered to look up that article's edit history. I believe this coincidence is because of J Sai Deepak's growing popularity & ideological appeal. I assure you: I'm not running or am not a part of a coordinated campaign for this article, in fact, I'm inclined to believe no such campaign exists. Thanks once again for appreciating my contributions. PunishedRottweilerAppreciator (talk) 18:07, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I meant to say "I am not related to these accounts" but deleted the "not" in haste. I assure you this is not a veiled acceptance of bad faith, just a simple error of omission. PunishedRottweilerAppreciator (talk) 18:09, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harishankar Brahma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State Electricity Board.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mark Dyczkowski

Hello, PunishedRottweilerAppreciator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mark Dyczkowski, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Dyczkowski (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Resubmitted without improvement. Sources like Ishwar Ashram Trust are at best primary so should only be used sparingly. I suggest using scholarly journals or books by reputable publishers that have written in-depth about him and his work. You have at least one (Journal of the American Oriental Society) but more like that are needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Dyczkowski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 15:49, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark S. G. Dyczkowski has been accepted

Mark S. G. Dyczkowski, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 15:26, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PunishedRottweilerAppreciator, given he is published under Mark S. G. I changed the title to that name but also created redirects for Mark Dyczkowski and Mark S.G. Dyczkowski. In addition, I added a citation to a lengthy review for The Doctrine of Vibration I found on JSTOR (footnote #9). S0091 (talk) 15:50, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Learned a lot about the process of finding good & reliable sources. Thanks once again. PunishedRottweilerAppreciator (talk) 20:12, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @S0091. This is PunishedRottweilerAppreciator, I'm posting from a public account. I've lost access to my Wikipedia account. My computer had to be formatted and it was the only place where my Wikipedia password was saved. I didn't enter an email address when creating my account and now cannot recover my account could you help me out? 106.213.85.26 (talk) 06:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is anything you can do if you don't have an email address associated with the account but ask at the Teahouse in case I am wrong. S0091 (talk) 12:55, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kingdom of Mysore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crawford Hall.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of monarchs of Punjab (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of monarchs of Punjab instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is more extensive than the article, and the draft and the article appear to have been developed independently. The material that is in this draft and not in the article should be appended to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of monarchs of Punjab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:16, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of rulers of Gujarat

Hello, PunishedRottweilerAppreciator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of rulers of Gujarat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sergei Sergeyevich Oldenburg has been accepted

Sergei Sergeyevich Oldenburg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 00:01, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of rulers of Gujarat

Hello, PunishedRottweilerAppreciator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of rulers of Gujarat".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:40, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]