User talk:RadheSlate

Welcome!

Hello, RadheSlate, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as K Himaanshu Shuklaa, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Malunrenta (talk) 15:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of K Himaanshu Shuklaa

The article K Himaanshu Shuklaa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable person and fails to meet the notability guidelines. The sources are just passing mentions without in-depth coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Malunrenta (talk) 15:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} as i am improving the article with more reliable sources (talk) 09:35, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Farida Jalal

Please stop adding Farida Jalal's publicist to her article. As already explained at User talk:103.196.79.206 We do not normally include trivia such as publicists, managers, promoters or agents in our articles.
Given the notice immediately above, you appear to be here to try to promote K Himaanshu Shuklaa. Please read and follow our policies on WP:Conflict of interest and WP:Paid editing - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 16:08, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not promoting K Himaanshu Shuklaa here, but was just trying to add a reliable source to rewrite the article. (talk) 09:43, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

However, you state on your User page that "I am also a Journalist and Publicist on freelance basis" - Arjayay (talk) 16:14, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely, there are so many enthusiast here who are Journalists and Publicists. Moreover, K Himaanshu Shuklaa is a renowned Publicist in Bollywood - (talk) 09:49, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of K Himaanshu Shuklaa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article K Himaanshu Shuklaa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K Himaanshu Shuklaa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Malunrenta (talk) 16:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islamic Exorcist, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Islamic Exorcist Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Islamic Exorcist Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sheitaan Poster Final.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sheitaan Poster Final.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ashuddhi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ashuddhi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 18:39, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ashuddhi.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ashuddhi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ashuddhi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ashuddhi. Thanks! Jupitus Smart 13:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kavita Radheshyam, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: [1] These additions violate WP:CRYSTAL Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:17, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RadheSlate. The nature of your edits, such as your singular focus on Kavita Radheshyam and your user page declaration of being a publicist, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:RadheSlate. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=RadheSlate|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:37, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cyphoidbomb, i am a Journalist and a Publicist for sure, but no where connected or 'Paid Advocate' of the actor, as assumed by you. There are many Wikipedia's articles in which upcoming events are mentioned without any reliable sources. Similarly i edited this article's upcoming projects based on the progress. As far as the award is concerned, i agree there are many awards in India, but an award is an achievement and Wikipedia's policies cannot discriminate an award on the basis of it's popularity. (talk) 05:48, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be clear, we seem to be now talking about this edit and this edit.

"an award is an achievement and Wikipedia's policies cannot discriminate an award on the basis of it's popularity." Of course we can. Wikipedia is not an inidsicriminate collection of information. See also WP:FILMCRITICLIST. Scooping up award mill accolades and bragging about them is entirely promotional. If Radheshyam wants to do so, she can open her pocket book and create a website and brag about it. But Wikipedia is not a forum for advertising or promotion, nor is it an extension of her CV.

"There are many Wikipedia's articles in which upcoming events are mentioned without any reliable sources." Meaningless argument. The existence of problematic content in one area of the encyclopedia doesn't justify the addition of problematic content in other areas of the encyclopedia. If there's trash on the street, does that justify my littering? Of course not. Claims about the future have to be adequately sourced per WP:CRYSTAL, which is one of our core policies. Further, two of the shows, Kaasura and Kaasuran sound like they're the same show, the same web series was listed three times in the web series table, and Danger appears to have been sitting on a shelf for four years. If you want to add Danger back to her filmography, I won't object, but you'll need to provide a reference that it finished shooting, and remove the release year, unless you can demonstrate that the film is scheduled for release this year. Same with the other projects. See also our reliable sourcing guidelines and WP:ICTFSOURCES so that you're familiar with the types of sources that are suitable, as IMDb is not and neither are any faceless blogs or sites like Koimoi or Filmibeat. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"If Radheshyam wants to do so, she can open her pocket book and create a website and brag about it. But Wikipedia is not a forum for advertising or promotion, nor is it an extension of her CV." I really have no idea what makes you reply this to me. If Radheshyam wants to do this, she will sure not ask or inform you. I deeply respect Wikipedia, it's policies and users (Which includes you) and i don't mean to offend you or anyone in anyways. But your above mentioned quote did made laugh. To be precise, no matter how much we scream, but i feel many celebrity use Wikipedia as their CV. Be it famous celebrity or non-famous. I feel very sorry for you, if you don't feel it that way. Here Sapna Sappu, another example who polishes her Wikipedia with Zero Reliable Sources.

"The existence of problematic content in one area of the encyclopedia doesn't justify the addition of problematic content in other areas of the encyclopedia." The quotes clearly indicate that you are specifically targeting me and my edits for the reasons unknown to me. If Wikipedia has certain policies which are to be respected, they must be respected in every ways. However, i still apologies, if i have offended you in anyways. (talk) 12:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 22:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Islamic Exorcist for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Islamic Exorcist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic Exorcist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sheitaan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheitaan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheitaan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sheitaan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheitaan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheitaan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashuddhi (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kieran207 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ashuddhi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ashuddhi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 03:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RadheSlate! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 03:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ashuddhi

Hello, RadheSlate. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ashuddhi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ashuddhi

Hello, RadheSlate. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ashuddhi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]