User talk:Rathoremohanrathore

Welcome!

Hello, Rathoremohanrathore, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Rathoremohanrathore, good luck, and have fun. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adel Rahman (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adel Rahman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rathoremohanrathore! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:18, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This (Rathoremohanrathore) is the only Wikipedia account I have. I do not have multiple Wikipedia accounts. I have not misused this Wikipedia account in any way. So please unblock me from editing and please return the Adel Rehman's draft made by me. Rathoremohanrathore (talk) 12:03, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock from editing

This is the only Wikipedia account I have. I do not have multiple Wikipedia accounts. I have not misused this Wikipedia account in any way. So please unblock me from editing and please return the Adel Rehman's draft made by me.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rathoremohanrathore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Rathoremohanrathore (talk) 12:06, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time, please. Confirmed sockpuppetry to Lalmohanlal. You are now considered banned by the community under WP:3X due to your chronic block evasion. Yamla (talk) 12:10, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock from editing

{{unblock|reason=This is the only Wikipedia account I have. I do not have multiple Wikipedia accounts. I have not misused this Wikipedia account in any way. So please unblock me from editing and please return the Adel Rehman's draft made by me.}}

I have confirmed this is a lie. And come on. I mean, it's blatantly obviously not your only account. I mean, do you seriously expect us to believe Rathorekirpalrathore is not your account? How stupid do you think we are? Your continued and incompetent attempts to lie to us guarantee you will not be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 12:14, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rathoremohanrathore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Rathoremohanrathore (talk) 12:12, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No reason provided. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:12, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.