User talk:Riskacademy

This is Riskacademy's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Risk Awareness Week (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It lacks sufficient reliable sources where presented sources of Wikipedia is a circular references which should be replaced by reliable or independent sources of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Risk Awareness Week and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Risk Awareness Week, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 13:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Riskacademy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fade258 (talk) 13:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Risk Awareness Week (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A lot of the sources appear to have nothing to do with the subject and several can and should be changed to the relevant article link. A lot of the content is unsourced, and it requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Risk Awareness Week and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. So Why 13:03, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock reviewed |1=riskacademy is a username I frequently use online, it is the name of my personal blog and youtube, if this conflicts with the wiki policy, happy to change the name |decline = This doesn't address your inappropriate edits. And yes, you'll probably have to change your username. Yamla (talk) 13:29, 2 November 2022 (UTC)} I don't understand the comment about inappropriate edits, inappropriate in what way? I created a draft page about an educational event /conference series that each year has 5000+ participants from 120 countries and is one of the biggest in the industry}[reply]

I don't understand the comment about inappropriate edits, inappropriate in what way? I created a draft page about an educational event /conference series that each year has 5000+ participants from 120 countries and is one of the biggest in the industry Riskacademy (talk) 13:53, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Risk Awareness Week

Hello, Riskacademy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Risk Awareness Week, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Risk Awareness Week

Hello, Riskacademy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Risk Awareness Week".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:54, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Riskacademy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

riskacademy is the stage name of Alex Sidorenko, there is no company named RISK ACADEMY, it is the name of the blog https://riskacademy.blog/ and youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/@riskacademy. No advertisement or promotions was done on wikipedia, I created a draft for RISK AWARENESS WEEK, which is the biggest online risk management and decision making conference running for the 5th year and welcoming 5000+ participants from 120 countries, free accesses always available. I believed and continue to believe RISK AWARENESS WEEK is an important contribution to the global risk community and fully deserves to have a wiki page. Please unblock so I can fix the draft and publish it. Riskacademy (talk) 15:19, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As the block notice says, "your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy. " --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:26, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.