User talk:Romanthapa8848

Minor edits

Please see WP:MINOR for when to tag your edits as minor. Cheers! Jeraxmoira (talk) 20:05, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bima Kumari Dura

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bima Kumari Dura, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 20:46, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sharmila Gurung

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sharmila Gurung, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 20:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sharmila Gurung

Hello, Romanthapa8848

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username FuzzyMagma, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Sharmila Gurung, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|FuzzyMagma}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

FuzzyMagma (talk) 15:12, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parijat (writer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boni. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:31, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boni (novel) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Boni (novel). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because None of the sources mention "Boni". I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. KylieTastic (talk) 14:23, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nepal

Roman, I am not going to get into that article right now cos I don't have the time but you should know that you're bloating it too much. You're not supposed to put everything you ever wanted to write about Nepal under Nepal. The article should be a reasonable size and a top level summary. If you want to get into more detail, you should do that in the sub-articles. What you're doing with modern history is absolutely unacceptable. I would advise you to restore it to how it was before and copy all of your expansion to Modern history of Nepal instead. If you ignore the advice, your work is ultimately going to go to waste cos someone who does have the time is some day going to look at that article and cut it down to reasonable size. You've given more space to the last 70 years than the 2,600 years before. See Wikipedia:Recentism#Article imbalance. Regards! — Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:39, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i think it's good now Romanthapa8848 (talk) 14:16, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 16:37, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, I will do it from now on Romanthapa8848 (talk) 16:45, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such a technology) in Wikipedia pages without carefully reviewing them, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Bobby Cohn (talk) 17:13, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Everest tourism moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Everest tourism. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Bobby Cohn (talk) 17:05, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i am very very sorry Mr. good sir but a term like "everest tourism" needing notability is out of this world. I would be happy if you publish the page I will add in the reliable sources and this the age of AI sir future edits in Wikipedia will be with the help of AI we should embrace it. Sorry very much and thank you very less. 😁 Romanthapa8848 (talk) 17:22, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:24, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Salaijo moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Salaijo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 17:27, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Himal, Pahad, Terai: Kohi Chhaina Parai moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Himal, Pahad, Terai: Kohi Chhaina Parai. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it violates WP:NOTESSAY and its only sources are to Wikipedia pages.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:38, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Culture section

	Culture section
	Hi! Culture section highlights negative things about Nepal. Can you please edit it if you have access level to do so. Rob1234wsh (talk) 06:20, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

can you mention speficifc word of sentence u can copy paste here thank you very much 😊 Romanthapa8848 (talk) 06:25, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Aoidh (talk) 17:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to make personal attacks against other editors as you did here and here you will be blocked from editing indefinitely. - Aoidh (talk) 17:32, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Romanthapa8848 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked unlawfully Romanthapa8848 (talk) 09:00, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What utter nonsense. There's nothing unlawful about a private website enforcing its policies. Your unblock request edges on WP:NLT and very, very strongly argues your block should be extended indefinitely. You need to take a completely different approach, starting now. Yamla (talk) 10:09, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sindhu Malla moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sindhu Malla. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shila Ale moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Shila Ale. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:53, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ankita Pun moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ankita Pun. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bimal Raj Chhetri moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bimal Raj Chhetri. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sharmila Gurung moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sharmila Gurung. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:42, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bima Kumari Dura moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bima Kumari Dura. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:43, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indigenous peoples of Nepal moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Indigenous peoples of Nepal. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it relies entirely on WP:PRIMARYSOURCES. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nepal without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 10:20, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Nepal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Nepal, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 19:51, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nepal. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 19:51, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Arjayay (talk) 20:46, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Nepal.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]