User talk:Roshan08.08
Welcome!
|
Ujjain
[edit]Hi, I had to revert you at Ujjain. You had copy/pasted a huge amount of content from Avanti (India) without saying where you got it from. You cannot do this because it breaches our licensing terms - see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. In any case there is no need to copy an entire article into another - that is why we have links. Does this make sense? - Sitush (talk) 11:58, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- You are now in the early stages of edit warring and you have not responded to the concerns that I raised above. Please do not reinstate that material again until you obtain consensus to do so. And if/when you do, please note where you got it from in the edit summary. - Sitush (talk) 13:24, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
June 2015
[edit]![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history at Ujjain shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 13:28, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. - Sitush (talk) 13:42, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Roshan08.08. With this edit you copied over 24,000 bytes from our article on Avanti (India) into Ujjain without saying where you got it. This appears to violate the guideline at WP:Copying within Wikipedia. To avoid criticism, you should undo this change and wait until you can get support at Talk:Ujjain for whatever improvement you are hoping to make. If you make no effort to reach agreement with others, you may eventually be warned for WP:Disruptive editing. In your entire career on Wikipedia you have never posted on a talk page. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 21:24, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
June 2015
[edit] It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Ujjain, may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:38, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ujjain, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:38, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
July 2015
[edit] Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ujjain. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yamaguchi先生 18:57, 21 July 2015 (UTC)