User talk:Simon Sunny

Welcome!

Hello, Simon Sunny, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Wikipedia:Anjan chowdhury, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! qedk (t 桜 c) 13:55, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Anjan chowdhury

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Anjan chowdhury, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. qedk (t 桜 c) 13:55, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Wikipedia:Anjan chowdhury has been deleted
Hello, Simon Sunny. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but Wikipedia:Anjan chowdhury has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD#G11. "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION." These must be rewritten from scratch from "reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject." See WP:RS.

Wikipedia:Identifying blatant advertising#Typical signs of blatant advertising contains information about content to avoid. For more information on content that may be perceived as promotional, click User:Deepfriedokra/promo. These are just rough guides. Pages can avoid all those pitfalls and still be glaringly obvious ad copy. Sometimes pages meeting WP:CSD#G11 give the appearance of an editor violating Wikipedia:Conflict of interest or WP:PAID. Please read and heed them if they apply to you. Please read Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations.

There is a very common mistake of assuming that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to promotion for commercial gain, but that is not so. Sometimes creators of promotional content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write or spent some time writing corporate documents or mission/vision statements or anything similar, they may simply be blind to the promotionality. It can be hard to unlearn.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources . Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.

The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. -- Deep fried okra 14:27, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anjan Chowdhury Pintu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anjan Chowdhury Pintu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JK (talk) 15:14, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Deb (talk) 16:02, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anjan chowdhury

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anjan chowdhury, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – Thjarkur (talk) 22:27, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anjan chowdhury-- getting nowhere

Please stop recreating this w/o fixing the problems. Please read the linked information in my earlier message. Please follow the WP:AfC process in the future and allow one of their reviewers determine if it is ready.-- Deep fried okra 23:02, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 00:40, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Seraphimblade: recreated the article once again. Best, GPL93 (talk) 23:57, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anjan Chowdhury (Pintu)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anjan Chowdhury (Pintu), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 23:56, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 00:00, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Simon Sunny (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Actually I tried to edit the previous writings of mine but it seems there was an issue which I didn't understood. A little help and guidance from the community could help me to reshape my writing. Moreover, I am completely new with this community , therefore it is tough for me to act as per the rules. Hope my banned will be lift up and do help me in the near future. Thanks Simon Sunny (talk) 20:41, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 20:55, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Simon Sunny (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Pardon my misdeed and I am actually sorry for what I had done. I had read all the guideline and rules once again regarding promotion or advertising. As a newcomer to keep all the things in mind is tough for me. Hope in the near future I would not repeat the same mistake. I will try my best not to cause damage or disruption and instead of that will make useful contributions. I don't know what to say anymore instead of being shameful. Thanks Simon Sunny (talk) 21:09, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you say you still want to write about Anjan Chowdhury, you don't seem to understand the policies you have violated(as described above) as well as conflict of interest. For this reason, there are not grounds to lift the block, and I must decline your request. You won't be unblocked to edit about him; if there are other unrelated subjects you want to write about, please say what they are. 331dot (talk) 00:12, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is your association with Anjan Chowdhury? Please review conflict of interest. What contributions do you want to make if unblocked? 331dot (talk) 21:47, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anjan Chowdhury is a re-known, well establish and one of the top businessman in Bangladesh. A friend of mine asked me to write something on him as it will help me to understand to create content writing on other media's, and this platform is the best way to enhance and test one's knowledge. I thought this will be easy and a good practice for me but I was completely wrong. After getting rejected from my first write up I was really shocked but I had went for a second attempt and face the same consequence. That's why I had again read the rules and guideline. Now, I think I won't make the same mistake. And to be honest, there is no financial benefit on this kind of writing. I do have my own way of earning. Nobody is going to pay me for this but the reason I am writing it again cause I had worked for it and done the research on my own. I don't want to let go my hard work in vain that's why I am adamant on this. I will obviously write on Anjan Chowdhury Pintu once agin but now on a different, new and proper way. Hope I am going to get the chance. Simon Sunny (talk) 22:10, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So, here's my concern. You saw that the article got deleted repeatedly. You received a warning saying you were going to be blocked if you kept this up. So on, so on. Why not, at any point during this process, did it not occur to you "You know, maybe I ought to quit doing this until I understand better what I'm doing wrong."? Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 03:20, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I told you the exact explanation still you are not getting me. Whether you want to lift up the ban or not, it's completely up to you but do get it that, there are lots of rules and guidelines in this community. To keep everything in mind and work as per the rules is really tough for a beginner like me. My first writing was deleted, as a backup I had a copy of my first writing and kept it at the sandbox for further editing but instead I could make the changes I was warned again. I was shocked to see that. After writing for the second time I got banned but honestly it was really tough for me to understand why I was blocked after giving a proper editing of my first writing. That's why, I had read the rules and guidelines couple of times and hoping not to do the same mistake again. I will try to give something better this time. That's all from my side. Simon Sunny (talk) 07:10, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to make another request, but I doubt you will be unblocked to edit about the same subject. 331dot (talk) 10:36, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You recreated it FOUR TIMES. I (and maybe others) could understand if you only recreated it a second time without realizing exactly what WP:PROMO meant, but four times? That is just straight up disregard for why it got deleted. Tknifton (talk) 11:30, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know I had done a mistake but I would like to resolve it by fixing it. As, it was my first writing there is an emotional attachment and vigorous research behind it. I don't want to go it in vain that's why I want to make the same article once again but keeping all the rules and guidelines in my mind. Giving a chance can help me to reshape my writing and contribute to this community. I hope everyone can understand this and this time I will give my best. Rest of the things will be guided and follow up by you, so, hoping that my banned will be lift up. Thanks Simon Sunny (talk) 20:10, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]