User talk:Skrapz2xw

The R.O.C.

It's cool man. What you got to do is click on Discussion, then the +.

Anyway, I don't know the technical stuff like adding pics and all. But for adding his history, just write it in your own words. I personally don't know much about the R.O.C. so I can't really add anything to the page. I have it in my watchlist though so I can help touch it up when it needs to be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Juggalobrink (talk • contribs) 21:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ya, the Esohpromatem seems right. I made some minor changes, added the source, and added the album cover just to make it look better. Juggalobrink (talk) 13:14, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That guy was right. R.O.C's new album is called Digital Voodoo, so I added it. It was announced on the new Weekly Freekly Weekly. I had reffed on the page already. Juggalobrink (talk) 21:29, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Esohpromatem

A tag has been placed on Esohpromatem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Carados (talk) 05:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Esohpromatem

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Esohpromatem. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. C777 (talk) 14:41, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:41, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Psychopathic Records

We needed sources showing the stuff. I was going to last night, but didn't. I don't know how to source the TNA and WWE stuff, but I can try to find sources for some of the trivia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Juggalobrink (talk • contribs) 13:20, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll add it.Juggalobrink (talk) 20:22, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well half the stuff was from their website ... Juggalobrink (talk) 13:41, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ya man, that's cool. I did it cause I was tired of that one dude removing alot of stuff. I kind of put more than what was needed as well, lol, so I was hoping others like you would edit it. So ya, just do w/e and I'll see it when your done. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Juggalobrink (talk • contribs) 05:01, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job. Juggalobrink (talk) 00:57, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Esohpromatem

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Esohpromatem, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:14, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of The ROC

Hello. An article had been created before on The R.O.C., but deleted following a deletion discussion, the details of which can be found here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The R.O.C.. Since the new version of the article did not address the issues for which the original was deleted, it was tagged for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#G4 and accordingly deleted. An article on this rapper will need to satisfy Wikipedia:Verifiability with references supplied from reliable sources. This does not include self-published sources or personal web pages. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 01:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to The R.O.C. has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 00:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nymf _hideliho! 19:09, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of China

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Invitrovanitas (talk) 10:33, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of China

You do not overwrite the entirety of an article just to suit your specific needs. There was absolutely no reason for you to move Republic of China, an article with thousands of edits, to "The R.O.C. (music artist)", an article that has been repeatedly deleted.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:41, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DO not move Republic of China to The R.O.C. (music artist) again and then completely override the article on the nation commonly known as Taiwan to cover this musician. If you do it again, you will be blocked.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:48, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You keep moving the page and then rewriting the article on the Republic of China to cover this rapper. DO not move the page again and do not rewrite it to be about The R.O.C.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:49, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during November 25 2010

This is your only warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:47, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

This is your last warning; the next time you move a page maliciously, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —slakr^\ talk / 10:48, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked this account for two weeks to give the individual time to consider what they want to do on the site. After reviewing the account's activities, it became clear that the only contributions this year are disruptive in nature; this mess involving the repeated deletion of a high-profile article on Taiwan in favour of a band, and a BLP issue in August wherein the user posted a false death notice and abusive text at Tila Tequila. --Ckatz^chat _spy 11:00, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This block is now indefinite per the thread at the administrators' noticeboard. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:52, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]