User talk:Sparksamanda478

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sparksamanda478, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:MedGulets - Voca Luxury Co., may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 03:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:MedGulets - Voca Luxury Co.[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:MedGulets - Voca Luxury Co., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 03:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I am writing to contest the speedy deletion nomination for the page "Draft:MedGulets - Voca Luxury Co." under section G11. I believe the content of the page adheres to Wikipedia's guidelines and is not solely promotional in nature.

The draft provides information about MedGulets - Voca Luxury Co., offering details about the company's services and its significance within its industry. It is my intention to present an objective and encyclopedic overview of the subject, ensuring that the content is informative and aligned with Wikipedia's content policies.

I have made efforts to address any concerns regarding promotional language and have revised the content to comply with Wikipedia's guidelines. The information included is accurate, verifiable, and relevant to users seeking knowledge about this entity.

I kindly request a thorough review of the draft before any decision on deletion is made. I am open to further collaboration and editing to ensure the content meets Wikipedia's standards.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely, Sparksamanda478 Sparksamanda478 (talk) 11:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - if you wish to contest this deletion, you need to start a discussion at User talk:Seraphimblade and, if the deletion is not reversed, you can start an appeal at WP:DRV and a refund request at WP:RFUD.

February 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 13:39, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 12:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sparksamanda478. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:MedGulets, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sparksamanda478. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sparksamanda478|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:37, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not receiving or expecting any compensation for my edits, and I do not have an employer, client, or affiliation. I do not engage in promotional activities. Sparksamanda478 (talk) 23:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Draft:MedGulets, you may be blocked from editing. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:MedGulets[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:MedGulets, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:37, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MedGulets (February 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Spiderone was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: WP:SPAM

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if the content was perceived as promotional. If you could provide specific feedback or guidelines, I'll ensure that any necessary revisions are made to align with Wikipedia's standards. The intention is to contribute factual and neutral information. Sparksamanda478 (talk) 23:05, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sparksamanda478! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]