User talk:Spengouli/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Spengouli. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Untitled (intelligent Wikipedia editors)
Don't vandalize or you will be blocked. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:40, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- What? You ADDED the Mike Poosikan vandalism when you undid that anonymous editor's contributions. Spengouli (talk) 03:41, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Dolores O'Riordan
On 16 January 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Dolores O'Riordan, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — xaosflux Talk 00:38, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Billy Herrington
On 3 March 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Billy Herrington, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Wessex 95 (talk) 23:04, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Isle of Dogs (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. The Old JacobiteThe '45 17:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Spengouli. In answer to your question: Why provide a designation for "Independent" representatives, when there are none? Because this particular article is dynamic, in that it reflects the House as it evolves through time. It is not about a static (fixed) period in time, like a specific past session (149th Georgia General Assembly) for example. In a static situation, you would be right to omit the Independent designation, if there were none. Because there never would be any, in that case. But in a dynamic situation, where there have been Independents as recently as the last few sessions, and might be Independents in upcoming sessions, the Independent designation reflects those past facts and future possibilities. Also, it simply provides continuity with the "composition" chart on the left portion of the article that reflects past party affiliations. Listing Independent, with a zero, simply means that there are none at the moment. Removing the Independent designation altogether, sends a different message I believe. Gulbenk (talk) 02:03, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Deletion
Hi, you nominated an article about a hostage situation for deletion. You stated in the AfD that such hostage situations are common. I completely disagree with that. This is NOT a news entry. A man who was chased by police, shot at police, murdered people, and was in a standoff, is FOR SURE not "just another occurrence." I do not understand why you would conclude that. More on it on the AfD! --Kingdamian1 (talk) 05:06, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
September 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Swimming (Mac Miller album), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:57, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Spengouli. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ITN recognition for 2019 El Paso shooting
On 4 August 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 El Paso shooting, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.
(lead2061) (talk) 01:10, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Nick Tosches
On 21 October 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Nick Tosches, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:09, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Rudy Boesch
On 2 November 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Rudy Boesch, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ITN recognition for Genesis P-Orridge
On 17 March 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Genesis P-Orridge, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 19:21, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Joseph Lowery
On 29 March 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Joseph Lowery, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 03:50, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Tom Coburn
On 30 March 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tom Coburn, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Indefensible (talk) 18:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Charlie Daniels
On 7 July 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Charlie Daniels, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 00:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |