User talk:Spliff Joint Blunt
This is Spliff Joint Blunt's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Welcome!
|
Gizmocorot, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]Hi Gizmocorot!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi |
2015 Ankara bombings
[edit]Heads up: Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#2015_Ankara_bombings.Lihaas (talk) 18:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
I see you have recently edited Nation state. There is a recent question on the talk page pertaining to photogrammetry which I would be grateful if other editors took a look at.
I am one of the involved editors but I am editing anonymously so as to try to avoid prejudicing you towards one side or other of the question. 2001:630:212:238:222:4DFF:FE69:DE59 (talk) 13:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 15
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Weighted voting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1961 Constitution. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Why were they reverted?
[edit]Both of the things I deleted were unsourced claims and statements, I see no reason why they should have been reverted. Burbak (talk) 19:39, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
The Wrong Kind of Censorship?
[edit]Please check out the webpage in relation to the reply quoted. For might not the deleting of this comment be considered censorship? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.150.50.196 (talk) 12:08, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- I agree with you, reversion of comment censorship, like Syria TV... Gizmocorot (talk) 12:11, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- Never mind the growing reports of FSA and IS outrages, Assad must remain Public Enemy Number One - the must evil man in the world? How easy for some folks to be neo-conned? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.150.50.196 (talk) 12:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
A cup of tea for you!
[edit]With this ever dramatic world and winter coming, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day! This e-tea's remains have been e-composted SwisterTwister talk 05:56, 23 October 2015 (UTC) |
Query
[edit]What was the user name you were using prior to taking on this new identity? When Other Legends Are Forgotten (talk) 22:33, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- @When Other Legends Are Forgotten: AndresHerutJaim Gizmocorot (talk) 22:49, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Andres is currently blocked. Are you saying you are violating your block? When Other Legends Are Forgotten (talk) 22:53, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Andres is currently blocked. Are you saying you are violating your block? When Other Legends Are Forgotten (talk) 22:53, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
“ | Humor tells you where the trouble is. | ” |
— Louise Bernikow |
that bs and you know it.
[edit]the IDF deaths are directly tied to the war. Nezi1111 (talk) 22:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Cheers, but do you think you could take a peek at the rest of the disputed block? I can't even make head or tail of it. Pinkbeast (talk) 00:01, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Spliff Joint Blunt. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Mike V • Talk 03:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC) |
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Spliff Joint Blunt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)