User talk:StarlightRose

StarlightRose, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi StarlightRose! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Emilia Clarke, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Nymf (talk) 09:40, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Nymf (talk) 11:26, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Psicosis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sleepy Hollow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jake Richardson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 7th Heaven (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Richardson

What happened in this edit to Jake Richardson?

Why did you revert my AWB edit which added gender to the categories? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

This is an only warning regarding your addition of unsourced material to Lindsey Stirling, David Garrett (musician), etc. These are considered violations of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy. You must not add biographic information that is unsourced, especially material of questionable veracity. If you have any questions, please leave them here or on my talk page. Thank you. — Huntster (t @ c) 00:14, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue adding unsourced biographical information to articles, I will block you. This is not acceptable on Wikipedia. — Huntster (t @ c) 01:11, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm Dwpaul. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please STOP editing articles by adding blank lines between templates and in other locations where they add no value to the articles. Your continuing to do so will be regarded as vandalism. If you want to add these articles to your Watchlist (the only reason I can think of for this activity short of vandalism), simply click the Watch tab while viewing each article. Dwpaul ^Talk 02:23, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vampire Secrets. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Dwpaul ^Talk 02:37, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm Dissolve. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. dissolve ^talk 01:03, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding nonsense information to articles. You've been repeatedly warned against doing so. Per WP:NOTHERE and WP:CIR. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Huntster (t @ c) 01:37, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]