User talk:Summit09

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Summit09, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 18:47, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Sv Tielse Eendracht Combinatie) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Sv Tielse Eendracht Combinatie, Summit09!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I'm moving the page to Draft:Sv Tielse Eendracht Combinatie so you'll have time to finish. Edit the draft instead of the article. After you're finished, add {{subst:submit}} at the top.

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sv Tielse Eendracht Combinatie (April 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Nothing currently suggesting the applicable solid independent notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sv Tielse Eendracht Combinatie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tom Coventry (moose)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tom Coventry (moose) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:18, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Tom Coventry (moose)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Talk:Tom Coventry (moose), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 14:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Summit09/sandbox, you may be blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:34, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Old writers"[edit]

Old writers, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sv Tielse Eendracht Combinatie (May 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Happysailor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please note that all articles need be be notable (See WP:NOTE), and be verified by significant and reliable third party references (See WP:SOURCE) which should be included by using inline citations (See WP:REFB)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sv Tielse Eendracht Combinatie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Happysailor ^(Talk) 10:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Summit09, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Happysailor ^(Talk) 10:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sv Tielse Eendracht Combinatie[edit]

Hello, Summit09. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Sv Tielse Eendracht Combinatie".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 09:36, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Marc McNulty, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:11, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richard Bordowski for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Bordowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Bordowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I'm Agaba Perez (talk) 10:59, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not all of the proper procedure was done on this nomination, including creation of the above-mentioned discussion page. I could have fixed it, but I decided to replace the tag with a speedy deletion tag since there is no claim and no evidence that Bordowski meets Wikipedia's notability standards for inclusion. --Finngall ^talk 13:59, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Bordowski[edit]

I disagree- you're the expert, not me, but he's a professional hockey player. This seems like a significant claim for importance to me. Summit09 (talk) 07:26, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article only indicated that he was playing in the NIHL, which is a semi-pro league. Being a semi-pro player falls far short of meeting notability standards, and this is what I based my assessment on. Another editor with far more experience in hockey matters than myself has since improved the article to include his time in fully professional leagues, which easily clears the bar. The article is a clear keeper now, and I will not intervene further. Thank you for your understanding, and happy editing. --Finngall ^talk 14:39, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies! It was my fault entirely for not adding enough info. Thanks for taking the time to reply. Summit09 (talk) 18:13, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]