User talk:Superfan95
Welcome!
|
Tom Tupper
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for your efforts in creating the page Tom Tupper. Unfortunately, minor fictional characters are not usually notable enough to have their own page on Wikipedia, so I have redirected it to List of M.I. High characters for now. You might wish to read Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) and Wikipedia:Your first article before creating more articles. Feel free to contact me with any questions you might have. Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 03:15, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
About website on hollyoaks
[edit]Can you do Joe roscoe on wiki please because I can't make it because it too hard for me Jakeylad97 (talk) 01:22, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Tom Tupper.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Tom Tupper.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Tom Tupper moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Tom Tupper, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:59, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Tom Tupper
[edit]Hello, Superfan95. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tom Tupper".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 09:40, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Category:Fictional stalking victims has been nominated for deletion
[edit]Category:Fictional stalking victims has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 03:53, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Tommy Clark for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommy Clark until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.