User talk:The13thdoctor

Welcome!

Hello, The13thdoctor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 17:07, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who edit request

Series lead Incarnation Tenure William Hartnell First Doctor 1963–1966[note 5] Patrick Troughton Second Doctor 1966–1969[note 5] Jon Pertwee Third Doctor 1970–1974[note 5] Tom Baker Fourth Doctor 1974–1981[note 5] Peter Davison Fifth Doctor 1982–1984[note 5] Colin Baker Sixth Doctor 1984–1986 Sylvester McCoy Seventh Doctor 1987–1989[93][94][95] Paul McGann Eighth Doctor 1996[note 5] Christopher Eccleston Ninth Doctor 2005 David Tennant Tenth Doctor 2005–2010[note 5] Matt Smith Eleventh Doctor 2010–2013 Peter Capaldi Twelfth Doctor 2013–2017 Jodie Whittaker 2017- (The13thdoctor (talk) 17:16, 14 August 2017 (UTC))[reply]

August 2017

Hello, I'm TAnthony. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jon Snow (character), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — TAnthony^Talk 14:58, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Despite storyline, the character is best known in the real world as Jon Snow. The Targaryen situation is well documented in the article, with appropriate sources. Please do not disrupt the article further by adding "Targaryen" etc as you have been doing. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 15:01, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jon Snow (character). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — TAnthony^Talk 15:01, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Jon Snow (character) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — TAnthony^Talk 15:04, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! — TAnthony^Talk 15:05, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Doctor Who S11 Costume Reveal (1).jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Doctor Who S11 Costume Reveal (1).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 01:31, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, I'm Zocke1r. I noticed that you recently removed content from Logan Paul without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Zocke1r (talk) 18:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Logan Paul, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Meters (talk) 23:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Logan Paul ‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Meters (talk) 23:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bond 25 (film 2019) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bond 25 (film 2019) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bond 25 (film 2019) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JC7V-talk 23:10, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Bond 25 (film 2019)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Bond 25 (film 2019). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Draft:Bond 25. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Draft:Bond 25. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at [[Talk:Draft:Bond 25|the article's talk page]].

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Atlantic306 (talk) 14:26, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Date of closure of the Disney/Fox merger

Hi, I reverted this edit because the sources do not say the deal will close on January 1, 2019 -- they say the deal will be ready to close on January 1, 2019. One of the sources cited on this page in fact states that although the deal will be ready to close on January 1, regulatory issues will likely delay the actual closure beyond after that date. Please see [Talk:Proposed acquisition of 21st Century Fox by Disney| the talk page] if you want to discuss further. Thanks, Aoi (青い) (talk) 06:18, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]