User talk:TheWikiPro0099

July 2022

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lisa Williams (psychic), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:45, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dl2000 Sorry it was done by mistake TheWikiBot009 (talk) 22:50, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Tiago Vieira Barbosa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tiago Vieira Barbosa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liliana ^(UwU) 20:37, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tiago Vieira Barbosa (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tiago Vieira Barbosa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheWikiBot009! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Thank you TheWikiBot009 (talk) 21:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, TheWikiBot009, contains the suffix "-bot", which is generally reserved for authorized bot accounts.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our username policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you wish for your existing contributions to carry over under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
Your requested new username cannot already be in use. Therefore, please check the list here to see if a name is taken prior to requesting a change of name.

Appeals: If, after reading the guide to appealing blocks you believe you were blocked in error, then you may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 06:12, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

globally renamed TheWikiBot009 to TheWikiPro0099

globally renamed TheWikiBot009 to TheWikiPro0099. Renamed. Welcome back. Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #61066

is closed. Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:53, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:07, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TheWikiPro0099 (talk) 23:14, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recently, I'm trying to appeal for my unblock. But it showing that ""It has been detected that you or someone else is trying to spam our system with appeals. Please wait until your previous appeal is closed, or if it is already closed, please try again later. If you are applying for an unblock of an IP address, this could mean that an appeal has already been submitted for your IP. In this case, please try again later or contact us to help clarify the issue""

My request is:

I know why I get blocked from Wikipedia for making disruptive edits. I've no exact reason to explain why you should unblock me. But next time I will follow every single guideline on Wikipedia. Please pardon my mistake and unblocked my accounts from editing.

Regards

TheWikiPro0099 TheWikiPro0099 (talk) 07:07, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheWikiPro0099 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I tried to edit the article maximum time. This is my mistake. From now I will follow every single guideline of Wikipedia to make Wikipedia environment clean. Regards, TheWikiPro0099 TheWikiPro0099 (talk) 23:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't understand what "I tried to edit the article maximum time" means. Also, can you explain how Special:Diff/1099454764 is a useful edit? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:16, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To NinjaRobotPirate and other administrators: I should have made incompetence a partial basis for the block.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:13, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheWikiPro0099 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock my account. I will follow all guidelines of Wikipedia and will not make any disruptive edits/Spam what violate Wikipedia TOS TheWikiPro0099 (talk) 11:15, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were asked a specific question above in response to your last unblock request, that needs to be answered, as well as you telling us what specifically was wrong with your edits. We don't want a general promise, we want to know that you understand specifically what you did wrong and how you will change it. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:26, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #61140

is closed. Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:37, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tiago Vieira Barbosa

Hello, TheWikiPro0099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tiago Vieira Barbosa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tiago Vieira Barbosa

Hello, TheWikiPro0099. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tiago Vieira Barbosa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]