User talk:The Ultimate Koopa

Speedy deletion of The Ultimate Koopa

A tag has been placed on The Ultimate Koopa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Iain99 18:22, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Super Smash Bros. Brawl. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Onorem♠Dil 18:25, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Super Smash Bros. Brawl. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. « FMF » 18:29, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:The Ultimate Koopa

A tag has been placed on User:The Ultimate Koopa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:User:The Ultimate Koopa|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rgoodermote 23:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry and Thank You

Yeah that was it, sorry for the rash decision on my part. But yeah that was why I marked it. Rgoodermote 01:11, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Cyber-bullying. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SchfiftyThree 00:42, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rescue 911

Hi, I noticed you have an interest in the page List of Rescue 911 episodes. This is a page I am busy working to construct, and it will likely take me a long time, as the show went on for so many years.

You probably have noticed what information I am trying to gather about each episode:

the date it was initially aired
the date of the event shown
the location of the event
a one-line summary
various external links. The external links I am looking for include:
- the YouTube videos of each story (they exist for many but not all)
- news links of the events
- pages on Google Street View showing the location of the event or some part thereof (unless it is a private residence)

If you can aid in the construction of this page, that would be very helpful. You can find information about the individual episodes at this site or at this site. On YouTube, the episodes are named with 3-digit numbers, with the first digit being the season, and the other two digits being the episode number. For example, to find season 2, episode 7, you would enter "Rescue 911 207."Sebwite (talk) 21:01, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Super Smash Bros. Brawl. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Arrowned (talk) 18:35, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Cookay

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Cookay, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rnb (talk) 23:08, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Slater

The reason I did that is because he's not in the show at the moment beacuase he's filming a fairly sizable storyline with the Mitchells which will be shown in a few weeks. He's on the departing characters section because he'll be leaving properly at the end of the year after that storyline. I hope that answers the question, I'm dyslexic so I probably only confused you! :) steveking89 22:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Dogpile. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Natl1 (Talk Page) (Contribs) 12:37, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of characters from Coronation Street. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Frickative 02:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Re: List of Simpsons Episodes edits

No, The Simpsons Archive is not a good enough source. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 17:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Waterloo Road Series 3.JPEG

Thanks for uploading File:Waterloo Road Series 3.JPEG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article you have edited is being considered for deletion - The Secret Mitchell

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Secret Mitchell for more infomation. Dalejenkins | 17:59, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

You may want to check this recent revert section out.--Rockfang (talk) 21:23, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Comments such as this are rather unhelpful in article space. If you notice more grammatical errors, please consider fixing them. The JPS ^{talk to me} 12:51, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Waterloo Road Series 5

Both waterlooroadTV.co.uk and Angela Griffin on Twitter have confirmed that the BBC have said Waterloo Road 5 will not air until at least the end of October. Early indications DID say September, with both Angela and various other members of the cast including Dean Smith confirming it on their twitter pages beforehand, however this looks set to have changed to October due to editing issues with the programme. Also, various recent articles such as http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/news/2009/08/07/denise-welch-quits-waterloo-road-for-loose-women-115875-21578739/ also state and October premier. 92.23.127.57 (talk) 17:39, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My Revert

I reverted your edit on Super Mario Galaxy 2 the other day and noticed that you undid my revert. Upon closer inspection it turns out you were right originaly so I made a mistake when I reverted your edit. I'm sorry, I'll try to do better next time. I Feel Tired (talk) 19:02, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK. The Ultimate Koopa (talk) 21:18, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article New Super Mario Bros. Wii has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 22:20, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Waterloo Road edits

Its all very well you saying "stop changing edits but keeping the same source" but in contry to your own edits where you provide NO RELEVANT source what so ever. Every source is relevant, even if some information is changed slightly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.9.140.117 (talk) 09:27, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Super Mario Galaxy 2 has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 13:05, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Super Mario Galaxy 2 edit?

My message says "an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate." One would think that "Holy shit... this article is fucking OLD!" is an inappropriate edit summary by any standard. Same goes for this, this, plus this, and that. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 00:09, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it, I believe you. :D I know you're doing the best for Wikipedia, it's just that I think that your future edit summaries could use some... touch-up. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 04:04, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Waterloo Road - Lauren Andrews

Hi, just thought id clear up the confusion around the character Lauren in WR. In the 4th series, Darcy was only supposed to be a minor character, but her contract was extended. The character was given the name Lauren Flecther, however this was only used on one occasion when the character's mother briefly appeared. In the new series, Lauren has become core cast and has been given the name Lauren Andrews. It's basically just a matter of a swift character name change. Hope this helps :) 92.23.200.164 (talk) 19:13, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article List of number-one singles from the 2000s (UK) has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Please be civil in your edit summaries I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 18:37, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SambucaKellyWR.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SambucaKellyWR.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:18, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EmilyJames.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EmilyJames.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 03:09, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Waterloo Road issues

Series 6 start - Karen David's twitter is the source for a possible September return
Vicki MacDonald - She's a recurring character in Series 5 like Lauren was in Series 4. Yes, she's filming Series 6 - but she's still a recurring figure in future episodes of Series 5
Ryan Sharkey - Shed Insider has the info on his appearance in Episode 18/19. WaterlooroadTV should be releasing the cast list for Episodes 11-20 this week —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.1.230.168 (talk) 09:27, 4 April 2010 (UTC)92.1.230.168 (talk) 09:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at The Simpsons (season 22). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. CTJF83 pride 03:34, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Nintendo 3DS. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Dancter (talk) 17:10, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Waterloo Road edits

Yes, all this coming from a poster who get all his "proof" from the waterlooroadforums.com. Don't make me laugh! That's one thing you have ALWAYS done on here. Preached about people's sources and other posters own proof, despite NOT being able to OFFICIALLY prove ANYTHING yourself. You heard the expression "swings and roundabouts"? No? Well look that one up then get back to me, I think you will find it's completely appropriate for you! 92.12.167.219 (talk) 10:58, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Waterloo Road Twitter

Fo your information, that twitter account is in fact the official Waterloo Road twitter, not some fan site as you put it. And before you say "your aware it is," then passing it off as a fan site as you did suggests otherwise. I suggest you really do think long and hard about the way you come across on here, because arrogance and small mindedness is something im certainly not going to tolerate from someone who is the pure dictionary description of "swing and roundabouts." 92.10.203.86 (talk) 12:51, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3ds Release Date

Well, I realize it no longer matters since official dates have been revealed, but for the record "within a fiscal year" is just as appropriate as "2011" or "Q4", and again, it was official, verified, and sourced by nintendo. I don't understand why you'd remove something like that, or why you'd challenge it now, after it being there for the last 6 months or so. (I know you've been around the page for awhile...) Sergecross73 msg me 13:12, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Simpsons Treehouse of Horror episodes

Please weigh in on Talk:List of The Simpsons Treehouse of Horror episodes#Inclusion of episode segment links, so we can generate a consensus. Thanks, Fixblor (talk) 09:28, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Addi hockey 10^e-mail 00:18, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for personal attacks and general incivility at List of The Simpsons DVDs. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jayron32 00:21, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relevent diff: [1] That edit summary is beyond the pale. In the future, please interact with other people at Wikipedia in a collegial manner. --Jayron32 00:21, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Now78UK.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Now78UK.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are being uncivil again...

Please don't be so harsh at List of The Simpsons DVDs. You were blocked for uncivility there last time and you don't seem to have learned anything. Please be calm in all editing. Thanks! Barts1a | Talk to me | Yell at me 06:08, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And besides which; if you are so desperate to have the 20th season you can buy it here. Assuming you don't have a $2 shop DVD player you should be able to play it. Barts1a | Talk to me | Yell at me 06:34, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm from Europe (the UK to be exact), which is in Region 2. It's not out here. I've said so many times that it's not out anywhere in the entire UK. I have tried looking up when it is released in Region 2, but I haven't found anything. Where does it say it was released on November 24?--The Ultimate Koopa (talk) 18:56, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously

Can you PLEASE cut it out! I know you are upset that you cannot get it anymore but the fact remains it WAS released and just because you missed it does NOT mean you have an excuse to make people think it was NEVER RELEASED! I have undone the change as it is un-needed. Please DO NOT redo it as in doing so you are REDUCING the quality of the article! Barts1a | Talk to me | Yell at me 07:57, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If it WAS released, where's the proof? That site is not proof. If it was released, it sould still be available. It's not available AAAANNNNYYYYWWWWHHHHEEEERRRREEEE in the entire of Europe! So give me proof it was released, without using some stupid piece of crap like cdwow, and nothing else. It should be on Amazon, it should be on Woolworths, HMV, etc. It's not on anything.--The Ultimate Koopa (talk) 16:06, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List of the Simpsons DVDs

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you are reminded not to attack other editors, as you did on Talk:List of the Simpsons DVDs. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you.Nightenbelle (talk) 00:04, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and please take it easy using "ALL CAPS" in your discussions. It's really not necessary. Sergecross73 msg me 03:09, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Offensive Edit Summaries

Please, again, stop with the offensive and "ALL-CAPS" edit summaries. If you haven't noticed, it doesn't get you anywhere. If anything, it probably hurts your credibility. If you do it again, I'm going to get Admins involved. Thank you. Sergecross73 msg me 12:47, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you are involved. Sergecross73 msg me 21:41, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing privileges have been suspended for 2 weeks

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Pursuant to the ANI discussion noted above, I have blocked this account for 2 weeks. This sanction is more in the way of a "last warning", in that I have no objection to it being lifted just as soon as you undertake to be less aggressive and tone down your commentary. That said, if you do start shouting and swearing again I suggest that you are then blocked indefinitely until you can convince an admin that you really will reign in the language. The same applies if you are inclined to allow the sanction to expire, without an unblock request. As for the issues, regarding availibility, I would note that WP does not concern itself with "reality" (as in "truth") but rather with what the reliable sources say - and your personal experience does not qualify as WP:RS. It can be a pain, but cyber foot stomping is not the appropriate method of dealing with it. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:16, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, can I still edit my own pages? As in my user pages?--The Ultimate Koopa (talk) 23:19, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The first thing you do after a block is the same thing you got blocked for?

Jeez; just drop the stick already!

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of The Simpsons DVDs, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Barts1a | Talk to me | Yell at me 00:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Ultimate Koopa. You have new messages at Barts1a's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Bart just beat me to saying the same thing; you just got blocked 2 weeks, and the first thing you do is start up again with the "ALL CAPS" responses? Please stop, or I'm going to an admin. Stay civil, and discuss things on the discussion page rather than going right back to reverting again. Sergecross73 msg me 00:32, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Ultimate Koopa. You have new messages at Barts1a's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You see; it's much nicer with caps lock off isn't it? Barts1a | Talk to me | Yell at me 01:15, 12 May 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, The Ultimate Koopa. You have new messages at Barts1a's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Plagiarism.

Please do not plagiarize again, as you did with this edit. You just copied and pasted the stuff straight from the Nintendo site. You didn't even provide a ref. Don't do it again, TheStickMan^[✆Talk] 14:04, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Now That's What I Call Music! 79 (UK series), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Coekon (talk) 09:08, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Now That's What I Call Music! 79 (UK series). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 13:37, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please don't start this up again. I won't hesitate to report you yet again, and you've been lectured at length that that's not how you address other people. I'm thinking you're still on pretty thin ice. Just a reminder... Sergecross73 msg me 15:56, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:MarioKart7logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MarioKart7logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:39, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:MarioKart7logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:MarioKart7logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SWF lash 14:51, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do not attack other editors

Even if the edits are done in bad faith, do not attack other editors. Calling them "stupid idiots" isn't helping, in fact, it may instigate them to be even worse. Please stop. Sergecross73 msg me 14:22, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Straight from your contribution list, here Sergecross73 msg me 18:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Wii U has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. -- ThomasO1989 (talk) 16:09, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Talk: Wii U. Please comment on the content and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 16:18, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 01:33, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. KTC (talk) 01:41, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Timeline House of Plantagenet

Template:Timeline House of Plantagenet has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:16, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Timeline House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha

Template:Timeline House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:16, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Timeline House of Stuart

Template:Timeline House of Stuart has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:17, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Timeline House of Tudor

Template:Timeline House of Tudor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:17, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Now78UK.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Now78UK.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]