User talk:The rolling beetle

August 2014

Hello, I'm Dwpaul. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jimmy Page without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dwpaul ^Talk 00:48, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jimmy Page, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dwpaul ^Talk 14:15, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paolo Bonolis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'''Paolo Bonolis''' ({{IPA-it|ˈpaːolo boˈnɔːlis}}) ((June 14, 1961) is an [[Italians|Italian]] [[television host]]. He made his debut in 1981 on ''[[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:38, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Adolf Hitler, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--Michig (talk) 11:34, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained deletion of sourced content.

Please stop deleting sourced content from articles without explanation, as you have done with the Karl Marx and Adolf Hitler articles. I can see no logical reason for your deletions, and frankly they look like vandalism. If you persist in such behaviour you risk being blocked from editing. AndyTheGrump (talk) 11:43, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Sulley Muntari, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Sam Sarpong. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please do not insert dates that are not supported by the sources. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:30, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. STOP removing / altering sourced content as you did in this edit [1]-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:38, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You must supply a reliably published source with a reputation for fact checking and editorial oversight not some random page on the web. AND the claims from your random page are specifically contradicted by MULTIPLE sources with actually established reputations of reliability. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom

Welcome

Hello, The rolling beetle, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your interest in Wikipedia! Your contributions can easily be tracked and monitored. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:30, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mario Balotelli. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vaselineeeeeeee (talk) 11:48, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barney Dalton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sidney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accidental addition of false information

I have reverted this edit because it adds false information; no doubt this was unintentional. When you use {{birth date}} metadata is added to the article's html which allows certain software to extract the information. The format of the metadata requires the ISO 8601 format, which is always in the Gregorian calendar. But when Henry VIII was born, the Gregorian calendar hadn't been invented and the Julian calendar was still in use. To emit metadata claiming Henry VIII was born on 28 June 1491 of the Gregorian calendar is not true. The birth date template should never be used with Julian calendar dates. Jc3s5h (talk) 13:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of intended legal action

Due to your persistent unconstructive edits, and the reputational damage they have inflicted on Wikipedia, it is the intention of the Arbitration Committee to start legal proceedings against the operator of this account. Slanderous edits will simply not be tolerated, and we will seek damages in the form of monetary compensation to the fulleat extent. You will shortly be hearing from our legal representatives.

Yours, Jimbo Wales and the Arbitration Committee 213.7.201.190 (talk) 11:41, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, The rolling beetle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, The rolling beetle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, The rolling beetle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Peter Whittingham, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barney Dalton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East Sydney. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm ScottishFinnishRadish. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Elias Davidsson, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:51, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths in 2022

Questions, comments and requests are made on article talk pages, not within the articles themselves. Please stop posting comments directly to Deaths in 2022 and use the associated talk page.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:53, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That includes in self-reverted edits to the page, in the edit summary. It's a no-no, and no-one takes any notice of that kind of information in such edit summaries. An edit request to the talk page is the only way forward if you want to get a notable person added and don't feel able to do it yourself. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 10:25, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Deaths in 2022. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Renewal6 (talk) 13:00, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss technical items such as when a person became deceased on the talk page and not in the article mainspace itself. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 11:57, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Deaths in 2022. This has been sufficiently explained to you. Renewal6 (talk) 22:51, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And again on my timestamped date, you made some puzzling edits to the page for no apparent reason. Please explain them if they are considered valid by you. They have been reverted. Ref ^(chew)(do) 18:27, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 17:41, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]