User talk:Themujahidd
September 2023
[edit]
Hello, I'm -Alabama-. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Cop Universe—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. -Alabama- (talk) 17:17, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Salman Khan filmography. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Salman Khan filmography was changed by Themujahidd (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916874 on 2023-09-16T18:34:54+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:34, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
- sorry being a new user I was unaware of these Regulations Themujahidd (talk) 18:53, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Tiger 3, you may be blocked from editing.
Google searches are not WP:Reliable sources - Arjayay (talk) 20:04, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- And now you are even edit-warring to re-include these sorts of unacceptable sources. Edit-warring is itself not an appropriate way work here, even if the content you wanted to add were to be ok. DMacks (talk) 09:19, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tiger 3.
IMDB and Google searches are not WP:Reliable sources - Arjayay (talk) 12:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Leo (2023 Indian film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
As repeatedly explained IMDB and Google searches are not WP:Reliable sources - Arjayay (talk) 13:58, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:05, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Themujahidd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked because i did many mistakes, but i took a break and went to learn editing in sand box and now i can do my best if i get a chance so i request you to please unblock me to overcome my regret @Girth Summit
Decline reason:
As per below. Yamla (talk) 21:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- No, this account was blocked because you have had previous accounts that were blocked. If you want to appeal this block, you will have to convince us that I made a mistake (bearing in mind that the block was based on the technical data behind this account). If you want to appeal the original block on your older account, you will need to log into that account and appeal it from there - but you will also have to address the block evasion. Girth Summit (blether) 20:54, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Unblock
[edit]{{unblock|you people have blocked me thinking that account named @Kingz22 is my sockpuppet account, but no it's not. I request to re-investigate the matter because i never created such account and I've been blocked unnecessarily and when i request for the unblock the requests get declined multiple times. Themujahidd (talk) 04:58, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Kick 2 (Hindi)
[edit] Hello, Themujahidd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kick 2 (Hindi), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)