Jump to content

User talk:Theopolisme/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5

Closed - MetaLab, Ltd.

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} I have moved this article to your userspace so that you can work on it. It's located atUser:Theopolisme/MetaLab, Ltd.. ... discospinstertalk 00:10, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Sorry for adding as an actual article. Theopolisme (talk) 01:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

CVUA

Of course, I would love to have you to help me out, but please note that I am usually around the weekends now because of my real, life-time commitments.Mr.Wikipediania (Stalk • Talk) 06:34, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

For Your Information

Hi, Just wanted to let you know that I have moved my CVUA discussion to its own talk page so as not to clog up my main talk page, it is located at User talk:TheGoofyGolfer/CVUA and I am in the process of reading those required articles per your last posted message and thanks again.TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 20:17, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Closed - U SUK.

U deleted my edits why

I don't know exactly what you're talking about... I never deleted edits by your IP address.Theopolisme(talk) 20:40, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

CVU Academy

[[

File:CVU Academy.svg|center|100px]]

Hello, Theopolisme/Archive 1! The instructors at the Counter-Vandalism Unit Academy have seen your hard work reverting Vandalism when you see it, and we thank you. But do you want to go to the next level? Would you like to know how reverts, warnings, reports, blocks, and bans all come together to keep the Encyclopedia free from disruption? Then considerEnrolling today!Achowat (talk) 14:10, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Cirex

Hi Moderator:

There are a couple of references, the magazines are the only one that I found online version of it, one of them is not still running, only online not printed.. but thr article is there. I know International Movie Data Base is not reliable but you can checkout even in the film itself appear Cirex name at the end of the credits. There are chances fir this artist to be on Wikipedia? is because Wikipedia is very respectful source of information, and tels more than his website itself. Thanks for your cooperation,

Mroxidizer1 (talk) 01:59, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for reaching out to me. I'd go ahead and say to just, quite simply, include all the references that you can per theWP:REF policies. If you include enough... even IMDB, sure. (make sure it's not the only one, though!). I would make sure Cirex is notable (WP:Notability), just write the article, cite as many sources as you can, then just let me know here when you write it and I'll take a look if you'd like. Enjoy, and thanks for editing Wikipedia! Theopolisme TALK10:19, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Moderator thanks a lot for your assistance. Thia he draft of the article:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Cirex

you can checkout by yourself nad let me know please if the artist is notable for Wikipedia. Is notable in Puerto Rico, but not in the States yet. There are the references, even his music appear on two movies including "Taken". That's all the the references i found on him, I guess are quiet good ones. Thank you for your assistance, Regards Mroxidizer1 (talk) 10:36, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Sure, happy to. Looking good - great how you have sources and everything in there. Thanks TheopolismeTALK10:38, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012

[[

File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Coconut with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has beenreverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read thewelcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cst17 (talk) 10:53, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

I was REVERTING a spam edit .. I didn't make that, if you'd kindly check the page history before reporting me for this nonsense claim. ThanksTheopolismeTALK10:55, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, I guess we were reverting the same edit at the same time, and the warning for the violator came on your talk page. Sorry.Cst17(talk) 14:27, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Sorry! Confusion. Apologies. Smile and make up! :) TheopolismeTALK15:04, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

CVUA Enrollee!

Hi Theopolisme

I understand that you have signed up at the CVU Academy and I would be delighted to be your instructor. If you would like to persue, please let me know at my talk page. We'll then begin work! MrLittleIrish (talk)© 15:05, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi! I just had a quick look through your recent reverts and you seem to be getting the grasp of policies absolutely fine. What I'm going to do is monitor your edits every now and again to check how you are doing with your reverts and drop you some feedback when I next check. For now, I would keep on going, get a good number more reverts done and then apply for rollback again. If you have any questions in regards to counter vandalism, let me know, and I'll help you out where I can.

Thanks

MrLittleIrish (talk) © 09:41, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Okey-dokey - sounds good. Just let me know... I understand that this is a relatively new program, just happy to be a member!Theopolisme TALK 10:20, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Just as a note, I notice you got templated before hand, try not to get too aggressive when explaining things to other editors. The editor may have misread what happened. Always WP:AGF MrLittleIrish (talk) © 14:29, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for advice - in retrospect, it did seem somewhat aggressive. TheopolismeTALK15:04, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi, little question for you.... Do you know of any Mac (Apple, whatever you want to call it) Wikipedia anti-vandalism software? So far, all I've seen has been PC Based... Theopolisme TALK22:23, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
WP:TW is useful, but it isn't just an anti-vandal tool. I use it too. WP:IGLOO is still in alpha testing, that's even before beta, but it's okay (Huggle is better, but that's only for PCs). I do not use it. I've never used Stiki eitherWikipedia:STiki. It is again not a main reverting tool, and has less than a million reverts. Hope that helps, PC's FTW!Dan653 (talk) 23:47, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Haha! :) Yep, I've been using Twinkle.... But Igloo looks interesting -- I might give it a look at some point. But so far just the Twinkle tools and then a manual edit here and there suffice. While on the subject of questions, I have another... Do you know of any other pages that I can look at to see latest revisions to Wikipedia - right now, I just constantly check the User Contributions page with the parameters "New Users, Article, Latest Revision"... but are there other places I should be looking? Namely, one that will show me IP edits? Thanks so much - Theopolisme TALK23:53, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Yes there is, and here's how you get to it.

  1. On the left side under interaction click on recent changes.
  1. At the top to the right of utilities click IP's contribs.
  1. Ta-da :D

Dan653 (talk) 00:03, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Oh wow. (smacks head on desk) Duh. Now, that right there is why the CVUA program rocks. Because if it weren't for you, I'd be clicking around all night. :D TheopolismeTALK00:05, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Here is a perma-link to Recent Changes, only IP contribution.Achowat (talk) 15:27, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Just to let you know...

The three apostrophes (''') after the <big> in your signature are not needed. Happy editing, and welcome to CVUA!Dan653 (talk) 00:19, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

You sure? I tried removing them, and the name became non-bold... Nonetheless, glad to be here! Theopolisme TALK00:38, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
I don't know that is odd. If you look at the edit above I removed the three without anything happening, but I'm not that deep into wikicode, so I don't know. Dan653 (talk) 23:33, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Here's a comparison: Your one above (w/o the quotes) Theopolisme TALK

VS Theopolisme TALK .... Isn't mine bold vs your version not as? But then again, I'm not deep into Wikicode, either... I learned how to modify mine from a tutorial! :) Thanks though for taking an interest, regardless!Theopolisme TALK 23:38, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Okay, never mind I see a difference, lol that was funny, must have been that green color :P Dan653 (talk) 23:58, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

  • Just so you guys know, the <big> makes the font larger, the (''') makes the font bold. They both have different effects. So if you want it large, use the big, if you want it bold, use the s. If you want it both, use both. MrLittleIrish (talk)© 09:59, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Cool, thanks for that clarification. Theopolisme TALK

CSD#A7

Hello Theopolisme! Just for info I removed the CSD tag you placed on University of Florida Indian River Research and Education Center per the reason given in edit summary. Please take a look at WP:CSD#A7. Thanks--SMSTalk 21:19, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Ditto on Code Chunk; "not worthy for inclusion - short, spammy, junk" is not a valid criterion for speedy deletion. I'll prod instead. Thanks,Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:19, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
I would read about the csd templates real quick, before you try any other speedy delete requests. Dan653(talk) 23:27, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Guilt washes over my twitchy, deletey fingers. Yeah - I seem to not really get this as well as I should. Thanks for helping me... I'm new here! :)TheopolismeTALK23:44, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
It's okay I'm still "new" here too User_talk:Dan653#Speedy_deletion_declined:_Andrzej_Za.C5.82ucki.Dan653(talk) 02:20, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

[[

File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Thank you for your recent submission toArticles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

  • To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sarah (talk) 05:56, 27 April 2012 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Theopolisme, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you'd like to drop by the Teahouse and discuss the article, the experienced hosts at the Teahouse would be glad to see if they can offer improvement suggestions... and that may lead to the article becoming accepted. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 05:56, 27 April 2012 (UTC)


Replied on your talk page. TheopolismeTALK10:57, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

[[

File:AFC-Logo.svg‎|50px|left]] Metalab (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you cancreate articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

  • If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Pol430 talk to me 12:42, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

[[

File:No Spam Barnstar Hires.png|100px]]

The No Spam Barnstar
thanks so much for sending me those links and everything -- cause without you i would have just kept messing up wikipedia (smile) YOU ROCK!!!!1!! (p.s. i found how to add these barnstars on that page you showed me about editing tips) Jesse929 (talk) 00:26, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Awww, thanks! Enjoy, and happy Wikipedia-ing! Theopolisme TALK00:27, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

No content speedy deletion

Hey, I noticed that you've tagged C.H.B for speedy deletion under A3. Although I agree that in the present state the article has no real content, it may be better to wait at least a few minutes before tagging it, to allow the creator time to flesh it out, as it may not have been created in its finished form. Ducknish(talk) 01:51, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

How long would you say is a good time to wait? Just curious. Thanks - TheopolismeTALK01:59, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
The usual standard is 10 minutes, but this doesn't matter as long as you've allowed at least a reasonable degree of time.Ducknish (talk) 02:10, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Okay, thanks! (adding to list of things to remember) TheopolismeTALK02:14, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi! :)

Hey, I wanted to see how you were getting on. How are you finding being a valued editor these days? MrLittleIrish (talk)©14:26, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

I've been incredibly busy with some.... family matters in the past month... and sadly, don't know when I'll be able to find time to edit. As they same, "Family comes first"... But I'm missing the Wiki. Hopefully I will be able to come back in the next month or so... thanks for reaching out. Theopolisme TALK00:17, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Take as much time as you need. You aren't expected to edit here at all, so don't worry about it :) MrLittleIrish (talk)申13:31, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Edits to 16PF Questionnaire

Hello Theopolisme

Thanks for the care you've shown in protecting the 16PF questionnaire page. I made two edits - so I'm not sure which one you didn't agree with. These are the reasons for the edits:

"35 languages" - the 16PF has officially been translated into more than 25 - there may be more, but those will be unofficial copies and therefore are not official 16PF questionnaires

"the 16PF questionnaire has not replicated" - yes it has - there are referenced pieces of research in the existing article that show that it has - hence why this statement is incorrect and contradicts other things in this article. As such this removal does not require additional citations.

How do we progress from here please? Naturally, I would like these changes to be made as they are factual. As the article currently stands, it is misleading.

Thanks and best regards

16PF Expert — Preceding unsigned comment added by 16PF expert (talk • contribs) 08:54, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for reaching out! Wikipedia, per its policies, requires content to be sourced... when you changed the number to 25 and added some information, it may have been completely valid and factual, but it was not sourced... so we have no way of proving its validity. If you can find an official source (such as a book, journal, or reputable website) that backs your claim, you can add it as a reference to your statements (and also add your statements back), using the tips located atWikipedia:References#Footnotes. Alternatively, if you can give me that information, I'd happy to re-add your material, along with a citation, to the article. Thanks again! TheopolismeTALK09:02, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Theopolisme

I'll do that now, with references.

Best regards

16PF Expert — Preceding unsigned comment added by 16PF expert (talk • contribs) 09:20, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Seriously!!

Will you please stop undoing my blanking of MobileMe and redirecting it to iCloud!! Dude, seriously!! MobileMe is DEFUNCT, just like iTools and .Mac!!! SO, it is unnecessary to have MobileMe's own article!!! Besides, iTools and .Mac redirect as well!!! Interlude65 (talk) 16:04, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Replied on Talk:MobileMe. TheopolismeTALK16:09, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

CVU Graduate

CVU Academy Graduate
Given that an Administrator has recently approved you for the Rollback Flag, it is the decision of the community that you have learned enough about Identifying, Restoring, Warning, and Reporting to be trusted with a new tool. As such, let me be the first to congradulate you for graduating from the Counter-Vandalism Unit Academy. Your instructor and the whole Academy will still be around if you have any questions. Congratulations! Achowat (talk) 14:13, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks very much! The program really helped, and I'm so glad that you guys were (and I'm glad still will be) around to talk to. Just one final note... Check the spelling of congratulations (I think you put a D in there) :) TheopolismeTALK14:58, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
I have no idea what you're talking about . Achowat (talk) 15:01, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Of course you don't.... you sly litte editor you.... XD TheopolismeTALK15:03, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Why do u like baseball?

[[

File:Trophy.png|100px]]

old people play baseball
afadfggkblk LCORL (talk) 01:19, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Come on, man... "Baseball is for old people" - really? XD TheopolismeTALK01:21, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

World Dog Show

question 1 - is it ok to delete broken links and/or URL's that do not seem to exist anymore without notifying the original editor(s) or leaving messages ?

question 2 - part of the data that I added (like some of the entry numbers) comes from a variety of printed sources that you can probably only find at fleamarkets, if at all; is it really necessary to add a reference for every detail ? If so, the references will easily/grossly outnumber the actual listings.

Alexandra Dumas (talk) 15:08, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for reaching out! In answer to question 1, it is usually better NOT to delete dead links, instead, tag them withTemplate:Dead_link -- I don't usually notify the original contributor,, but if you feel the need to, more power to you--there's no right or wrong about notification of dead links. In answer to question 2 -- this is a bit iffy. It's actually rather debatable -- see Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2008_November_5#Over-referencing, then take a look atWikipedia:You_don't_need_to_cite_that_the_sky_is_blue - again, this is a case by case basis - do you have a link to the article in question, by any chance? Thanks for editing! TheopolismeTALK19:12, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Peter Huang

Sorry! I Do Not English.

I Love Peter Huang, He is a Taiwanese Freedom Fighter!

--馮光遠想跟能登麻美子交合 (talk) 10:39, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

You MUST have at least one reliable source included with your article -- in Japanese (Google Translate, may be sloppy): あなたの記事で少なくとも一つの信頼できる情報源が含まれていたに違いありません. Thanks! TheopolismeTALK10:42, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
--馮光遠想跟能登麻美子交合 (talk) 10:51, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
I'm adding this as a reference on the Peter Huang page. - 私は、Peter Huang ページのリファレンスとしてこれを追加しています。Theopolisme TALK 10:57, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
--馮光遠想跟能登麻美子交合 (talk) 11:18, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
I've got to go for now, please just add these on your own - go to WP:References for how-to's!Theopolisme TALK 11:19, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) User's language is Chinese, not Japanese. I'd post a message in Chinese, except all I can remember from my few (Mandarin) Chinese classes is how to say, "My name is Peter. I am Australian. This is my pen." And even then I can't get the tones right. I'll see if I can locate (a) a Chinese speaker (b) more refs (c) both a and b. --Shirt58 (talk) 11:21, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. I just Google Translated it and came up with "auto-detected: Japanese" - argh, the terrors of the non-language-fluency-people-like-me ... sorry bout that. Thanks! (smacks head in shame) Theopolisme TALK11:23, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
No worries, mate! Though many of my contribs would suggest that I happily wander around in languages I've never studied,this one hints at the fact that I really struggled to barely pass High School maths.--Shirt58(talk) 13:56, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Ah, nobody's perfect.... TheopolismeTALK15:03, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Theopolisme,
Allow me to be a little incensed and put on my teacher's hat for a minute.  It is somewhat easy to confuse Japanese and Chinese, Japanese has borrowed many character from Chinese known as Kanji, but they also use Kana characters which Chinese does not.  Don't trust Google translate much on Asian languages.  You can always poke around at AfC, someone there speaks almost everything.  Taiwan is formally know as the Republic of China(ROC) as opposed to Peoples Republic of China(PRC) or mainland China.  Taiwan writes in Traditional Chinese characters and the PRC uses Simplified Chinese characters.  I will try to talk my Taiwanese partner into doing something with that article if he is bored today, I have gathered some cites for it.
Rant is over.. :-)
Be careful classifying articles as B, very very few really deserve it, especially right out of AfC.  Welcome on board and thanks for your help.  :- ) Don00:00, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Lost you at Allow me... XD -- Thanks for clarifying that! I'll be sure to file that away in my long, long, LONG term memory banks... But seriously, thanks. Now, what on earth did I classify as B-class? Only things I remember were a Start-class and one that I didn't classify, as I honestly had no idea...Theopolisme TALK00:15, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Theopolisme, good call at "Lost you at Allow me"--Shirt58 (talk) 17:31, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Question

Hello. When Uploading the cove of a music album or single, what should I do if I'm not sure who the author of the said cover is? Since in most cases the creator of the cover is a different artist than the musician. Should I assume it's the musician or the label or do I have to find out the artist's name?

Mazyar92 (talk) 10:54, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for getting in touch! If you want to upload the cover of a music album, use Wikipedia:Upload/Non-free_album_cover, which is a customized upload wizard for uploading... album covers! It states explicitly what you need and is quite helpful. Let me know if anything is still unclear! Theopolisme TALK11:01, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

TruPepitoM

I approved TruPepitoM to the academy because he meets the minimum qualifications. You already said that you would take him, so he's your student now. However, I would suggest that you teach him what is listed on Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy/Instruction methods as well as anything else. Please contact him on his talk page to confirm. Good Luck!Electriccatfish2 (talk) 17:55, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Up, Out and Ready for Action

Please put in my talk page what are the ways in instructing me in CWU. I'll let you know also my schedule on a need-to-know basis, somehow. TruPepitoM(talk) 01:31, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Theopolisme. You have new messages at Optakeover's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Offer of support

Thanks Theopolisme - this is handy! --Soulparadox 06:20, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Ah, well, glad you think so. Just doing my part! :) TheopolismeTALK06:27, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Question

I have a problem with Keanu Reeves' Wiki page. He never actually said that he was an atheist, yet it is posted thathe is with two bogus "references". Please change it, it's not accurate. Besides, the two "references" didn't state that he said that he was an atheist.

Thanks for getting in touch! I took a look at the page and at the two references next to that statement (23,24). It seems like both of the references actually do state that Reeves was an atheist - "He reportedly has called himself an atheist", "Hollywood movie star Keanu Reeves said the making of supernatural thriller Constantine has not changed his beliefs about religion but admitted he was now less sceptical about heaven and hell.", and the title, "Keanu 'still an atheist'". If you can find references that state that he is not an atheist, please let me know - I'll then be happy to remove said statements. .. One minor P.S., don't forget to sign your talk page comments with 4 tildes (~~~~). :) Theopolisme TALK16:45, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
The websites state that he is an atheist. Keanu Reeves himself didn't say he was an atheist. He said he really wasn't raised in a particular religion. He didn't say that he didn't believe in God. So those references aren't really accurate.

Also, there is a Keanu Reeves biography by Sheila Johnston that is very accurate and states that he is spiritual, and his mother would practice whatever religion her lovers/husbands were at the time. I just find it very annoying when people post things that the celebrity didn't say himself and take it as the truth just because some stupid website says so. I know nowadays it's not hip or "PC" to believe in God, I'm not religious or anything, but I do believe in God, I was raised Catholic and I am proud of it. I don't have anything against people who don't believe in God, I just don't like people slandering. It's false statements like this that make this website about as accurate as Star/Enquirer magazines.

Thanks. Lo_lee_ta_81

Hi, and thanks again for getting in touch with me. I strongly suggest that you post your comments on the talk page of Keanu Reeves' article, where others can see your thoughts and, if a general consensus is reached, the material that you find objectionable can be removed. Let me know if you need help posting these messages, otherwise,thanksfor being a Wikipedian! :D TheopolismeTALK04:01, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

[[

File:Brownie transparent.png|120px]]

I was looking through your talks with Pepito and you are fast becoming a great instructor, keep up the good work!Dan653 (talk) 19:56, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! Just doing my part to (cue nostalgic music) make Wikipedia a better place... TheopolismeTALK19:58, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 June 2012


thanks for the warm welcome

My main interest is war economics and history and on editing Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki I got into a fight with Binksternet. I admit the topic is controversial. Thus all statements have to have a strong source. The quotation of Tsuyoshi Hasegawa is fraud (note 9) and taken out of context. The quotation of International Review of the Red Cross, No. 323,is fraud and taken out of context. As stated on Binksternet talk page. Foresee a war of edit-undo, but I am stubborn - as long as I can deliver primary sources. Winston Churchill's quotation has to go out (and so does my comments). It's a POV, not based on any evidence to support it. --Robertmossing (talk) 17:20, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for reaching out. I took a look at the page history and it seems that you and User:Binksternet have been having a rather heated dispute - this actually is against the Wikipedia edit-warring policy, which states, "an editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material, on a single page within a 24-hour period," also known as the three revert rule. I suggest you take a look at that information, and then talk to Binksternet calmly and try to work something out - if no consensus is reached, you two both may end up getting banned.. And that wouldn't be very enjoyable! I actually requested that Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki be given Page Protection, which will prevent you both from editing - which should cause you two to discuss these issues.. Let me know if I can ever be of any more assistance to you, and as always, thanks for being a contributor! :) Theopolisme TALK 17:29, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

good idea. It s a controversial topic. I hope it gets attention from people who either knows something OR is LESS emotionally involved and therefore can better evaluate the validity of the sources. The day of 'anniversary' is coming soon and a lot of pupils may 'click' on the article. So I want the article to be without bias and with sources for the pupils to investigate on their own. 'Ceasefire' may be a good temporary solution to our fight :)--Robertmossing (talk) 18:08, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theopolisme/Archive_1&oldid=1142533155"