User talk:Thothunter
September 2018
[edit]Hello, I'm Sakaimover. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Monster House (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Sakaimover (talk) 12:33, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Monster House (film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 12:38, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. - David Biddulph (talk) 13:22, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Apology
[edit]Sorry if it seems opinion based but I thought at the start he was bad at basketball Thothunter (talk) 12:40, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Monster House (film), you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Monster House (film) was changed by Thothunter (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967749 on 2018-09-24T12:56:23+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:56, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Monster house
[edit]I did not make a disruptive edit. It has added detail to the plot and is not opinion based. Tell me what guidelines it breaks. I admit, my other edits were opinion based however all this is, is adding a detail to the plot description Thothunter (talk) 12:59, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- The message you responded to was from a bot, i.e., an automated program, not a person. David notMD (talk) 14:38, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Thothunter, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Thothunter! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 24 September 2018 (UTC) |
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Clone trooper.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Clone trooper was changed by Thothunter (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.968051 on 2018-09-25T13:04:32+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:04, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Hey - if you're still around...
[edit]Hi, if you've not been driven off forever by the very unwelcoming Automatic notices that got splatted here above (I guess we could remove them now, since you seem to have understood well enough what, at least the last one, was for) - then I'd like to say "welcome" !
I looked at the changes you made, and my feeling is you would like to make good changes to the articles. I must admit it can be pretty tricky to get things right. I don't really have any good tips for you just now on how to best get started - I'll give you a heads up if I do think of anything though! Maybe just one point - if you like the idea of making changes or adding stuff here, don't let the "mumbo jumbo" and over zealous bots drive you off! Regards Sean Heron (talk) 21:53, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hi Thothunter! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|