User talk:Trisivavaperur

November 2019

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —SpacemanSpiff 09:50, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:26, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 12:11, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Trisivavaperur. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:10, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Communicating with other editors

Hi Trisivavaperur, welcome to Wikipedia.

In the messages at the top, multiple other editors have expressed concerns about your edits. Please take the time to address them. When someone complains here, please wait for a moment, have a look at your contribution list, click "diff" next to the edits and try to understand what might have caused the warning. Afterwards, please take the time to respond to such messages, by clicking "Edit" and adding your answer below the other user's message. Use the following format when doing so:

:Hi {{u|Username}}, ...

At the end of your message, please add "~~~~". This automatically generates your signature, like at the end of my message.

If you have any questions, please ask! If anything is unclear, please ask! Ignoring messages won't help; please take the time to respond to them, especially if something is unclear. Thank you very much in advance.

Best regards
~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Trisivavaperur, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Margaret Mead have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:53, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adam's Bridge

I have undone your addition to Adam's Bridge. The sources, while interesting, are not strong enough to support the text you are trying to add. Please open a discussion on the article's talk page to gain a consensus on whether a change along these lines should be made. Please do not simply revert my edit. Per WP:BRD you now need to discuss the change before adding it to the article. Thanks, The Mirror Cracked (talk) 15:56, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adam's Bridge, you may be blocked from editing. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 07:44, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adam's Bridge. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 15:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]