User talk:Umutcan123456

Blocking has been expired.[edit]

My blocking and autoblocking has been expired. Now, when urge to my contributions? Also can i take back like This? Also I'm sorry for copyright violation For This Image! If you want to say an answer, ask. I'll reply. But you must know, I was changing the selected countries and cities in every monday. Thank you. Umutcan123456 (talk) 20:40, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to edit your user page[edit]

Re this edit. Frankly, but politely, I don't need it. First, your userpage does not belong to you. Please see Wikipedia:User_page#Images. Non-free images are not permitted on userpages per terms of WP:NFCC #9, as was explained in the edit summary of the edit I performed that removed File:Coat_of_arms_of_Canada.svg, which is marked as non-free, from your userpage. I have re-removed the image. Do NOT restore it, as this is a direct and blatant violation of our policy, as linked above. If you persist you may be blocked from editing. If you have questions, ask. Restoration of the image will not go well for you. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 17:57, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Umutcan123456. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You have been told repeatedly that this usage of the image is not allowed under our non-free content policy. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:39, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:VernoWhitney. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Wayne Olajuwon chat 19:46, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to User talk:Wayne Olajuwon. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Wayne Olajuwon chat 19:51, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked[edit]

for one week. I don't think you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a playground for you or your brother (you shouldn't even be sharing accounts). This and this are unacceptable, as is this. You don't own anything and you don't have any right to determine "permissions". Once your block expires, I urge you to contribute to the encyclopedia and not just your userpage. Also, do not let your brother access your account again, or it will be blocked as a compromised or shared account, per the relevant policy. /ƒETCH COMMS / 21:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:42, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your week-long block has been reset due to block evasion. Further block evasion will result in a longer block on this account. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:36, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Umutcan123456/Next Country and City[edit]

User:Umutcan123456/Next Country and City, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Umutcan123456/Next Country and City and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Umutcan123456/Next Country and City during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:46, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copies in userspace[edit]

I have removed the copies of articles on your userpage per WP:UP#COPIES. Please stop adding them. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:48, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Umutcan123456. You have new messages at Eagles247's talk page.
Message added 20:19, 26 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Replied. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:35, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Subpage[edit]

I have explained this many times to you. You cannot copy the contents of an article on Wikipedia into your userspace per WP:UP#COPIES. My patience for this nonsense is waning. Please stop at once, or I will block you from editing. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki-stalking[edit]

What is going on behind this? Please explain. –MuZemike 19:06, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, Eagles247 explained it to me; I thought there was something else going on here. My apologies, –MuZemike 19:11, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Subpages[edit]

For the last time, I will not move my subpages into mainspace. There is no policy against having userspace drafts in a subpage. Stop hounding me immediately. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:23, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are recently asked for the solve. You must be work more for your subpages. So, do not keep them as an inactive subpage (See My To-do list for more) Inactivity considered to deletion. Umutcan123456 talk 19:28, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, you are wrong. I do NOT have to do anything with these pages. I am allowed to have "inactive" subpages per Wikipedia's guidelines. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:30, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then, work. Umutcan123456 talk 19:31, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:32, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for For persistent wikistalking and personal attacks- you are not editing articles, merely hounding other editors on their Talk pages, and you have previously been warned and blocked for this. Accordingly, the only conclusion I can draw is that you are not here to help build an encyclopedia, and go you must.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu 19:50, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Umutcan123456 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm recently blocked for editing due to WP:NFCC violation. Before today, i edited the one of contributions (Trabzon, which changed its picture). And now, unblock me for temporarily, because i have de-list to one of my to-do list. Thank You. And i have a question, can i re-put this template? Umutcan123456 talk 20:10, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information.
You were not blocked for WP:NFCC, you have been blocked for serious hounding and stalking of other editors - I see nothing in this unblock request to address that issue. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:31, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Umutcan123456 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Really?! See my block log. Thanks for helping to unblocking request, but this makes me confusion. Now i'm in Quake 3 Arena, you know. See ya at 45 minutes later. Bon Voyage. Umutcan123456 talk 20:44, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblocking provided. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:57, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Umutcan123456 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is the last chance of unblocking. The answers to decide the decline, accept or on hold: Decline: Hmmm. Then i use the my IP address to contribute more. Accept: Thanks for unblocking me, but give a rules such as WP:STALK. On Hold: I'll think that you support as "Accept". If you "Decline" (I'm only contribute as picture changing) i have log out the user and you may be underestimated. Also, once upon a time, one of users is Deletes because violating of WP:UP#COPIES. You may select the choice. NOTE: When you "Decline" i was continue to contribute as IP Umutcan123456 talk 19:27, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Threat of further block evasion is never a grounds for unblocking. Talkpage access revoked. Syrthiss (talk) 19:41, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you saying that if we decline you will evade your block by editing as an IP? Syrthiss (talk) 19:35, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. You cannot block me while i'm editing as IP. Umutcan123456 talk 19:38, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]