User talk:Usercontent78
Welcome!
|
A page you started (Todd Moscowitz) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Todd Moscowitz, Beatagrabo!
Wikipedia editor Karlhard just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This is a good article but it need improvement. I will help you! Nice work.
To reply, leave a comment on Karlhard's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Usercontent78, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Usercontent78! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 29 March 2015 (UTC) |
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit]Hello, Usercontent78. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Todd Moscowitz, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Hi, your edits on only the one subject (WP:SPA) have lead me to the question...do you have a connection with the subject? Widefox; talk 09:18, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
April 2015
[edit]Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Todd Moscowitz does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list and
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Widefox; talk 09:21, 1 April 2015 (UTC)