User talk:Vanwalker

License tagging for Image:Arrows1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Arrows1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:04, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

The image has been deleted. I do not believe it was "public domain" either, unless the photographer specifically released his rights. If you want to upload the image again, please provide information on the exact source and license that allows you to use it on Wikipedia. Thatcher131 15:48, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Vodkacollins2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vodkacollins2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:15, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Arrows1a.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Arrows1a.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:04, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:CRVC.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CRVC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:40, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:ILRNR.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:ILRNR.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. --ImageBot 23:40, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TokyoNY.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:TokyoNY.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TokyoNY.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TokyoNY.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Tags

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Terry N. Taylor. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 21:11, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Terry N. Taylor. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 21:11, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Terry N Taylor

A tag has been placed on Terry N Taylor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 20:50, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the tag as being misplaced as it does not fall under WP:CSD#A7. There might be a risk of WP:PROD or an AfD started tho. Also, please think about using the "show preview"-button to avoid multiple revisions when you are making mistakes. Keep up the work though! Regards So Why 21:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Arrowsphoto.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Arrowsphoto.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Arrowsphoto.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:20, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Arrows1974.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Arrows1974.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC) --Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lead / References on Alan Merrill.

You appear to be edit warring me on Alan Merrill. I understand where you are coming from however I am just trying to bring the article up to Wikipedia standards. This means 1) it should be properly referenced - see WP:REF, and 2) that it should have a brief lead section describing the subject and stating the grounds for notability - see WP:LEAD. My requests for dialog on the talk page have been ignored. If you continue to revert these edits you will likely be blocked. You'd be better off putting your efforts into finding decent refs. I am willing to help. If you are the subject of the article I would direct you to WP:AUTO#IFEXIST for an explanation of Wikipedia policy in such matters. Generally speaking it suggests that an article's subject restrict his/her self to discussion on the talk page except for cases of blatant vandalism, and any facts that are added should be verified by reputable 3rd party sources. Wwwhatsup (talk) 05:49, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Alan Merrill 2010.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alan Merrill 2010.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Merrill Alan 2010.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Merrill Alan 2010.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have made the appropriate change in the status of the photo that I took of Alan Merrill in Tokyo last January 25th, 2010, as required by wikipedia.

VanwalkerVanwalker (talk) 19:36, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. cymru lass ^{(hit me up)}⁄_{(background check)} 00:19, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you cymru lass! Sincerely, VanwalkerVanwalker (talk) 16:51, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome

Another thing you might find helpful is knowing how to indent discussions. This makes it easier to see replies. I indented my reply by placing a colon ( : ) before it. If you want to indent your reply to my reply, you can put two colons in front of it. --- cymru lass ^{(hit me up)}⁄_{(background check)} 18:13, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting the hang of this,cymru lass, thanks to you and others in the wiki community for your help! All the best, VanwalkerVanwalker (talk) 19:30, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. You can post questions on the helpdesk or the new editor's help page if you can't find a user to help you. You can also put {{helpme}} on your talkpage, followed by a help request and someone will stop by to help you. --- cymru lass ^{(hit me up)}⁄_{(background check)} 00:04, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to I Love Rock 'n' Roll may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

weekly TV series based on their performance of "I Love Rock N Roll." The [[Arrows|Arrows_TV_series)]] was where Joan Jett became aware of the song while she was on tour with her band the Runaways in

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:08, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:First released version of I Love Rock N Roll in 1975.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:First released version of I Love Rock N Roll in 1975.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 22:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Alan-Merrill-2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alan-Merrill-2.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MyJam music network (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thegooduser was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Vanwalker/MyJam music network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Vanwalker/MyJam music network, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 00:08, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vanwalker! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 00:08, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Vanwalker/MyJam music network

Hello, Vanwalker. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MyJam music network".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 02:11, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]