User talk:Wikiblanks

November 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Brian Babin, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:12, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Brian Babin with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:25, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Brian Babin shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:28, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikiblanks, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Wikiblanks! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:28, 14 November 2014 (UTC) December 2014 Hello, I'm Stesmo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Brian Babin because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Stesmo (talk) 00:15, 2 December 2014 (UTC) Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Brian Babin with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Biblioworm 00:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Brian Babin with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —Frosty ☃ 00:58, 2 December 2014 (UTC) Please read the talk page as you are editing an ongoing dispute about another editor's posting of LIBEL.Wikiblanks (talk) 01:00, 2 December 2014 (UTC) This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Brian Babin with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Frosty ☃ 01:05, 2 December 2014 (UTC) Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Tiller54 (talk) 01:17, 2 December 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Materialscientist (talk) 01:24, 2 December 2014 (UTC) {{unblock reason=NOT VANDALISM - Negative libelous content about a living person, who is not even the subject of the article.SEE BRIAN BABIN TALK PAGE FOR ONGOING DISCUSSIONWikiblanks (talk) 01:33, 2 December 2014 (UTC)}} Sockpuppet investigation Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikiblanks, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Stesmo (talk) 03:36, 2 December 2014 (UTC) Blocked for sockpuppetry