User talk:YellowMonkey/Archive167

Sarah Andrews[edit]

1 —SpacemanSpiff
4 -- Mattinbgn\^talk 09:56, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 16:44, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 or 3. 4 looks like she just spent a wet weekend in Wolverhampton. At least she looks her age though.... ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 12:58, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 —Dark 06:30, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 (captures the concentration) Abecedare (talk) 06:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:35, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 Chzz ► 03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 --Nvvchar (talk) 11:26, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 Khoi khoi 03:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Andrews batting[edit]

They're an interesting pair of pictures. I like both. I probably prefer #2. Pdfpdf (talk) 13:20, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Have uploaded an edit of 2. Durova⁴⁰⁹ 18:44, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Mattinbgn\^talk 09:56, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Aaroncrick (talk) 05:48, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 16:44, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2
2 ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 12:58, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Dark 06:30, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 in Sarah's article. 2 in Hang the bat article. Abecedare (talk) 06:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:35, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 Chzz ► 03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2.--Nvvchar (talk) 11:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 is much better. Khoi khoi 03:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Andrews catching[edit]

4 different looking Dincher (talk) 01:35, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4 - agree with Dincher. --Pdfpdf (talk) 13:21, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- However, the other 3 have their merits, too Pdfpdf (talk) 13:22, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 or 3. Normally ball-in-the-air is the obvious choice, but the framing and low posture on 1 are unusually clean. Durova⁴⁰⁹ 18:45, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 for me. Good shot of upward pointing fingers. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 09:56, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 - face clearly visible, athletic looking pose Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 16:44, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 —Sandahl (♀) 03:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 12:58, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 —Dark 06:30, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 (all 4 are good!) Abecedare (talk) 06:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:35, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4 for variety Chzz ► 03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1. A clear picture--Nvvchar (talk) 10:49, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 or 3, leaning towards 1. Khoi khoi 03:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ellyse Perry[edit]

Ellyse Perry batting[edit]

2 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 19:02, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 good action photo. Dincher (talk) 01:30, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 or 2. Maybe both. As Dincher says, 2 is a good action photo. --Pdfpdf (talk) 12:54, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2—Sandahl (♀) 20:38, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 - --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 12:38, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Dark 06:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Y not? 18:25, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1. 2 is a better action shot, but I like the stance in 1. - Bilby (talk) 08:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
hmmm... 3, because you need to see a face (even if not really) - 2 is ok for Forward defensive article - good gender balancing :-) Privatemusings (talk) 03:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 –MuZemike 00:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think they're all useful except number 4. 1 establishes the batting position, 2 is a good action shot, 3 is a good demonstration of a cricketer's equipment, but 4 is too busy. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 22:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 Echo what cryptic said. Abecedare (talk) 06:31, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2, or 1. Ncmvocalist (talk) 12:52, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2 Better 'action' showing ball Chzz ► 03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2 as it is full picture with the ball in sight.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 – 2 is a good action photo, but you can't see her face... –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:03, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cptnono (talk) 02:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
none --Sandahl (♀) 20:15, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 Elockid ^(Talk) 00:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ellyse Perry bowling[edit]

1 or 2 —SpacemanSpiff
1, maybe 5 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 19:02, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 Dincher (talk) 01:31, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5, though none of them make her look too great – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
per Harrias. I probably prefer 2. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:56, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5, given that we are more interested in her bowling action that a recognisable face with this group of photographs. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 09:47, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 as I prefer front on bowling shots. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5 or 1. ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 12:39, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 or 5 —Dark 06:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5 -- Y not? 18:27, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5 for the action. - `Bilby (talk) 08:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5 Privatemusings (talk) 03:46, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5 –MuZemike 00:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps 2 if you crop it to the top of the black wall. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 22:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 or 5 Abecedare (talk) 06:31, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5. Ncmvocalist (talk) 12:52, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2. Are you kidding me? She looks ridiculous in every other one but 2. Khoi khoi 05:44, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 blurry, but most 'natural' - others do have a strange posture Chzz ► 03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5 shows full bowling action.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:29, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 or 6. 6 shows hand position. Not exactly a classical bowling action! But it looks like she enjoys herself. --Dweller (talk) 09:26, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 per Chzz. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:05, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cptnono (talk) 02:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 --Sandahl (♀) 20:16, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 Elockid ^(Talk) 00:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Leah Poulton batting[edit]

3 —SpacemanSpiff
2 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Did an edit on 3. When framing and cropping this type of shot it's a good idea to leave more room to the right. Centering is less important than giving the viewer an impression that she has enough room to swing. Durova⁴⁰⁹ 18:35, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 - I like the stance Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:47, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 —Aaroncrick (talk) 05:45, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 - stance as Ruhr says. ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 12:48, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 likewise, stance hamiltonstone (talk) 23:16, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 —Dark 06:21, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3--User:Dakota ^{Leave message here} 03:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 or 3 Abecedare (talk) 06:18, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:30, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 Chzz ► 03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3--Nvvchar (talk) 10:39, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3. Khoi khoi 03:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 Cptnono (talk) 02:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 Elockid ^(Talk) 00:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Sthalekar[edit]

2 —SpacemanSpiff
2 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 AND 4 --Pdfpdf (talk) 13:13, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:15, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4 (smile), 2 is also good Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:49, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Sandahl (♀) 03:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 or crop 4. Finally somebody who looks their age!! ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 12:50, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 hamiltonstone (talk) 23:17, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Dark 06:22, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 or 4 Abecedare (talk) 06:17, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 or 4. Ncmvocalist (talk) 12:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:31, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 Khoi khoi 05:42, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 Chzz ► 03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 is my preference--Nvvchar (talk) 10:41, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 Cptnono (talk) 02:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 Elockid ^(Talk) 00:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Sthalekar catching[edit]

2 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:49, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 —Aaroncrick (talk) 05:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1—Sandahl (♀) 03:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neither of them. ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 12:50, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 —Dark 06:22, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1--User:Dakota ^{Leave message here} 03:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 (she looks pained, but that's what distinguishes cricket from baseball ;-) )Abecedare (talk) 06:17, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 (lol Abecedare). Ncmvocalist (talk) 12:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:31, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 Chzz ► 03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:41, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 Khoi khoi 03:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cptnono (talk) 02:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Elliott[edit]

1 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 16:46, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 -I thought she was 14. She is twice that age!! ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 13:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 —Dark 06:31, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 —SpacemanSpiff 06:05, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 (or none) Abecedare (talk) 06:01, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:36, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 Chzz ► 03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 is preferred.--Nvvchar (talk) 11:23, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 Khoi khoi 03:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 Cptnono (talk) 02:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Elliott bowling[edit]

3. Durova⁴⁰⁹ 18:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 -- Mattinbgn\^talk 09:57, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 16:46, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 —Sandahl (♀) 03:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 13:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 —Dark 06:31, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 —SpacemanSpiff 06:05, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5 --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:59, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 or 3 Abecedare (talk) 06:01, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:36, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 Chzz ► 03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 is my preference.--Nvvchar (talk) 11:22, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 Khoi khoi 03:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cptnono (talk) 02:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Elliott fielding[edit]

3 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 16:46, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3—Sandahl (♀) 03:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 13:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 —Dark 06:31, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 —SpacemanSpiff 06:05, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4 --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:00, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 Abecedare (talk) 06:01, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:36, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 Chzz ► 03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 is for action and expression.--Nvvchar (talk) 11:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 Khoi khoi 03:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4 Cptnono (talk) 02:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rachael Haynes[edit]

6 —SpacemanSpiff
3 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
6 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
6 —Sandahl (♀) 03:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
6 ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 12:53, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 or 6 —Dark 06:26, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5 is a better photo but 6 shows her more. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:55, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 Abecedare (talk) 06:14, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
6 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:33, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
6 Chzz ► 03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
6 is nice.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:43, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
6 Khoi khoi 03:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
6 Cptnono (talk) 02:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
6 Elockid ^(Talk) 00:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 or 7 AirplanePro^Radio_Checklist 01:20, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rachael Haynes batting[edit]

4 —SpacemanSpiff
2 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4 —Sandahl (♀) 03:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 12:53, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 is the best image, but you can't really tell who it is. hamiltonstone (talk) 23:18, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4 —Dark 06:26, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4--User:Dakota ^{Leave message here} 03:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:55, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 or 4 Abecedare (talk) 06:14, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:33, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 or 4 Chzz ► 03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4 is my choice--Nvvchar (talk) 10:43, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 Khoi khoi 03:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 Cptnono (talk) 02:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 Elockid ^(Talk) 00:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 AirplanePro^Radio_Checklist 01:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rachael Haynes fielding[edit]

4 —SpacemanSpiff
4 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Poor Rachel. Durova⁴⁰⁹ 18:37, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4 I guess Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4 —Sandahl (♀) 03:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 12:53, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4 —Dark 06:26, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4--User:Dakota ^{Leave message here} 03:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4 Abecedare (talk) 06:14, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:33, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4 Chzz ► 03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 is better.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:43, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 Khoi khoi 03:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 Cptnono (talk) 02:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4 Elockid ^(Talk) 00:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 practically, but 4 is kinda funny. AirplanePro^Radio_Checklist 01:22, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rachael Haynes bowling[edit]

7 or 11 —SpacemanSpiff
- There's no 11. —Dark 06:26, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
7 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
7. Durova⁴⁰⁹ 18:38, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
9 ball and wicket visible, 7 is OK Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
7 —Sandahl (♀) 03:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
7 ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 12:53, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
7 —Dark 06:26, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
7--User:Dakota ^{Leave message here} 03:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
7 --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:55, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 or 7 Abecedare (talk) 06:14, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
7 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:33, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
7 Chzz ► 03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
7 it is.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:43, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
7 Khoi khoi 03:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 Cptnono (talk) 02:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5 Elockid ^(Talk) 00:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rene Farrell[edit]

1 or 6 —SpacemanSpiff
1 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 - pyjamas again. Go Pyjamas!! --Pdfpdf (talk) 13:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 or maybe 2 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:11, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1—Sandahl (♀) 03:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 or a crop of 3 ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 12:55, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 or 6. —Dark 06:28, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 or 4 --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:57, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 Abecedare (talk) 06:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
7 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:34, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 Chzz ► 03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 for sure. Khoi khoi 03:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cptnono (talk) 02:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 Elockid ^(Talk) 00:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rene Farrell bowling[edit]

1 or 6 —SpacemanSpiff
1 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
0 - She doesn't seem to be enjoying it much! Pdfpdf (talk) 13:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5. Best contrast. Durova⁴⁰⁹ 18:39, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 Gives the best view of her bowling action as the ball is about to leave her hand. May not be as artistically appealing as the shots where the ball has left her hand but a better shot for the purposes of explanation and description.
5 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:11, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5—Sandahl (♀) 03:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 12:55, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5 —Dark 06:28, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5--User:Dakota ^{Leave message here} 03:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:57, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 or 5 Abecedare (talk) 06:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:34, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 Chzz ► 03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 is my prefrence.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5 Khoi khoi 03:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3 Cptnono (talk) 02:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 Elockid ^(Talk) 00:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rene Farrell fielding[edit]

1 —SpacemanSpiff
1 – Harrias (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
0 - No, sorry ... --Pdfpdf (talk) 13:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:11, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1—Sandahl (♀) 03:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neither of them. ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 12:55, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 —Dark 06:28, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 or none (the face is overblown in 1) Abecedare (talk) 06:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 ThrowawayAccountforYMpoll (talk) 20:34, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 Chzz ► 03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 is my pick.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 Khoi khoi 03:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 Cptnono (talk) 02:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 Elockid ^(Talk) 00:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]