User talk:Zppix/Archives/2015/November

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Atomic Energy Research Establishment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Centre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Jeet Thayil

Hello Zppix, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jeet Thayil, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Sahitya Akademi Award winner and Man Booker Prize shortlist is sufficient to pass notability, more than sufficient for A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 19:22, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Okay... thanks. I'm going to go ahead and close this conversation, as I don't want to cause an argument.

St George's Boys School

Please note that {{stub}} goes at the bottom of the article not the top (WP:ORDER), and doesn't take a date parameter. Thanks. PamD 10:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your recent Teahouse message

It is good of you to try to help at the Teahouse, but there are two things to bear in mind. Firstly, rather than giving a url to a Wikipedia page, it's normally better to give a wikilink, such as [[Wikipedia:Your first article]], which renders as Wikipedia:Your first article, rather than the cumbersome https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Your_first_article. Secondly you marked your edit as minor, so you ought to read WP:minor. Happy editing! --David Biddulph (talk) 19:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Me marking the edit as minor was an accident. I didnt think you could do [[Wikipedia:Your first article]] Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 20:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

You'll find more about wikilinks at WP:Wikilink. --David Biddulph (talk) 20:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Hey Zppix. I actually came here to drop a similar message. One other tiny little thing. Generally we only refer to encyclopedia articles – that is pages on knowledge topics in the mainspace – as "articles". Most others are "pages", or more specifically, some type of page, like "project page" (which would accurately describe Wikipedia:Your first article), "draft page", "talk page" and so forth. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:01, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your Teahouse profile picture

Hi again Zppix. The photograph you're using for your Teahouse profile gives every indication of being a pre-made celebrity headshot with his name pre-printed that you got an autograph on. Is that image really your own work? That is, do you actually own the copyright to that photograph because you snapped it yourself? Being in possession of a photograph in no way would make you the owner of the image or its copyright, nor does scanning that image making it your own work.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:29, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

I guess I'll change it. When i signed up I wasn't sure on what it meant.Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 13:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Yes, it's a very common, good faith misunderstanding. You should also mark the image for deletion at the Commons. You can use {{speedydelete|<reason in prose>}} Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Hello Zppix. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3),or significance (CSD A7) moments after they are created, as you did at Papan Tanda Di Malaysia. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:09, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Baldor foods

I undid you rchange of my sppedy reques ton this redirect. It is a redirect to a deleted article so G8 is correct. Your choices of A11 and G5 are both invalid. The original article was created by a COI editor and was deleted as promotional, but that does not mean teh article qualifies for speedy as an inventionof the author. And the article was not created in violation of the user's block since he was not blocked at the time he created the article. That category is not retroactive unless the author is a sock of a blocked editor. Meters (talk) 00:40, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

The filter tagged it as a blocked editor created the page that is my bad.

Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 00:43, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Mo Elleithee

How is Mo Elleithee not notable enough to deserve a Wikipedia article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dcpoliticaljunkie (talk • contribs) 01:07, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Well considering the article doesn't even have content telling me shes notable that how... feel free to improve the article and I or another editor will remove the tag DO NOT remove the tag yourself. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 01:14, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Really? https://www.linkedin.com/in/mo-elleithee-12242b4

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that this is a really prominent political figure

Linkedin and other social media is not a reliable source... and you cannot base notiablity off that. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 03:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=En1U1P9di64 Kevjonesin (talk) 02:23, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello Zppix, xxx has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Allygggggg (talk) 19:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Please comment on Talk:Malala Yousafzai

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Malala Yousafzai. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done I gave my suggestion on the talk page Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 01:36, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Franjo Tuđman

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Franjo Tuđman. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done I replied back will wait for reply if im needed back.

Hey Zppix! I would love to be adopted by you! I am really fascinated in how Wikipedia works and would love to have someone show me the ropes so I can contribute the best way that I can. Thank you for your kind offer! I am pajamas (talk) 19:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Open-Channel SSD

Hi -- I've improved that Open-Channel SSD article a bit more. I was somewhat loose with my terminology, and got a few things wrong -- I've tightened things up now, and no longer confuse the LightNVM abstraction layer with the underlying NVM Express technology. -- Impsswoon (talk) 22:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Great, If you ever need me to do a formal full review just let me know. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 22:10, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject World's Oldest People

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject World's Oldest People. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Draft: Emile Rey

Hello Zppix. Thanks for reviewing the article on European alpine mountain guide, Emile Rey, which you declined. It might have seemed I had simply resubmitted this article without addressing the concerns raised by User:SwisterTwister, but in fact I had quickly acted to remove all the uncited first ascents of the various lesser mountain summits which I had myself flagged with {{cn}}, but were raised as a weakness in the draft. These lesser ascents were obtained from French, Portuguese, Italian and Spanish pages on Emile Rey, rather than confirmed myself from mountaineering literature, which all the remaining secondary references have now been. I would wish to challenge any suggestion that the subject does not meet WP:N for the following reasons:

• The first ascent of any unclimbed mountain peak is a significant event. The names of the first ascensionists always remain a significant part of that mountain's history, and is always referred to in articles about that mountain. I assert that this renders any person(s) involved in attaining an unclimbed alpine mountain over 4,000 m in height very notable. Their name lasts for centuries, unlike many lesser sports achievers of today.
• The secondary sources I cited do demonstrate Rey's great significance in the history of European alpine mountaineering in the mid-1800s.
• The mountains and ascent routes around Mont Blanc first climbed by Rey in the mid 19th century were amongst the most difficult and dangerous unclimbed high mountain peaks in Europe.
• There are already other non-English articles on Emile Rey which demonstrate his notability.
• This article in English is better cited and more detailed than the non-English pages on Emile Rey, and also far better referenced than those on most other other notable European mountain guides, such as those you can find here: .
• Emile Rey is equivalent in notability as Hazard Stevens or P. B. Van Trump in their ascent of Mount Whitney, Robert Tatum on Denali or Michel Croz on the Matterhorn
• A mountain feature (Col Emile Rey) was named in recognition of Rey's achievements, and a statue erected to him in Italy.
• Latter day mountaineers have reviewed Emile Rey's achievements, and stated his worthiness to be remembered, and some of these have been cited.

Following initial concerns I have however also now added further citations, content and an image of the Col Emile Rey, and the draft article's talk page contains additional content I plan to research and cite once this is mainspace. I tend to like submitting articles through WP:AfC because of the rigor it demands, though admittedly this can sometimes be a little frustrating - on both sides, I'm sure! I hope I've explained things OK, and thanks for all your efforts. I trust you will feel able to reconsider your decision. Parkywiki (talk) 02:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done Accepted moved to an article space. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:08, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks - much appreciated. Parkywiki (talk) 16:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fiona Graham

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fiona Graham. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Carly Fiorina

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carly Fiorina. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

The Sugarcane Cycle

Sorry, this is just a translation request and I forgot to add the link to the original article in Portuguese.--Targumferera (talk) 19:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Norman Milliken

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Norman Milliken. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dochub Logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dochub Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done added it on the article it was intended for.

Please comment on Talk:Genesis P-Orridge

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Genesis P-Orridge. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Royal Households of the United Kingdom

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Royal Households of the United Kingdom. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kim Jong-un

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kim Jong-un. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

• Source 1
• Source 2
• Source 3

Please do not prod my articles without a valid reason. Thank you :) RugbyXIII (talk) 21:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

There isn't any references in the references section. Hence why I prod your article. Thanks. --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

The sources are still there, your PROD was invalid. Please be more careful in future. RugbyXIII (talk) 21:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

it's very clear from WP:BLPPROD that your BLPPROD was not correct The External links were sufficient to prevent a BLPPROD. There don't have to be references in the references section. You have had multiple messages concerning your inappropriate speedy deletion and PROD tags. With less than 2 months of experience it does not appear to me that you have enough experience to be patrolling new articles. Meters (talk) 22:13, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Meters, I have at least a year granted most of my edits were this year. However I'm ignoring any more replies to do with this. I do not want to argue. If the argument continues i will report all parties involved. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 22:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

(edit conflict)::::I agree with Meters, you do need to learn how to use PRODs properly and when users raise legitimate concerns with you, you need to learn to not put petty warning templates on their talk page as you did with me. This comes accross as assuming bad faith at best and at worst, plain trolling. (Also, just to follow up my comments from earlier, I should point out that by "my articles", I meant articles I have just started/created, not articles that I believe I somehow own. Thanks! RugbyXIII (talk) 22:24, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Post edit conflict comment: You can ignore this comment if you like, you have no valid right to report it as no policy violations have occurred. Have a nice day. RugbyXIII (talk) 22:24, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Report me for what? You created your account 2 months ago, you've made multiple mistakes in patrolling new pages as pointed out by several editors, and I'm politely snuggesting that you stop patrolling new pages until you have more experience. Meters (talk) 22:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

My mistake. You created your account 14 months ago, but made no edits until 2 months ago. Meters (talk) 22:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Stop commenting on my talk page immediately Thanks Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 22:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Railways (Disambiguation)

The article Railways (Disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Malformed and unnecessary dab page: see Railway (disambiguation).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 23:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

1. This dab page is not needed: Railways leads to Rail transport which has a hatnote leading to Railway (disambiguation), and the dab page you started is not a useful addition to the encyclopedia.
2. Disambiguation pages which need a bracketed disambiguator have "(disambiguation)" with a small "d", not a capital D
3. Entries in disambigaution pages arenot numbered, but presented as a bulleted list (ie you need to use " * " and not " # ")
4. Entries in disambiguation pages are not piped, except sometimes for formatting: if you want to link to "Railways of China" then that is how it should appear in the disambiguation page
5. I'm not sure what you thought you were doing in piping "[[British Railways|British Railways]]", as the two sides of the pipe seem identical
6. Disambiguation pages are not stubs and should not be tagged as such.

Please take a little time to learn how disambiguation pages are created and used before trying to create one. WP:MOSDAB is worth some attention. Thanks. PamD 23:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation pages

When there is no agreed "Primary Topic", a disambiguation page belongs at the "Base name"(see WP:MOSDAB) - in other words, as no one person is agreed to be the "Harvey Johnson" more likely to be wanted than all others put together, the disambiguation page belongs at Harvey Johnson. Your move was incorrect, and I have reverted it. Please take time to learn more about the encyclopedia before trying to make changes like this. Thanks. PamD 00:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Wanne was a mess too. PamD 00:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fields Medal

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fields Medal. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Jonathan Paul Wagner

Hey there it would be a huge help if I could get a second opinion on the article I am creating Jonathan Paul Wagner I have reworked most of my source and have edited my content to show notability.Nmazz (talk) 20:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Nmazz

 Done I contested the deletion I think it should stay however in the future maybe create it as a draft first then move it into an article space. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 16:16, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of ministers of the Universal Life Church

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of ministers of the Universal Life Church. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Full Service (book)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Full Service (book). Legobot (talk) 00:01, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports). Legobot (talk) 00:00, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nicholas A. Christakis

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nicholas A. Christakis. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Marco Rubio

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Marco Rubio. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello Zppix, Me-123567-Me (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:03, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.