Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 January 20

< January 19	January 21 >

January 20[edit]

Template:Michel Teló[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:56, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Michel Teló (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I see no reason for a template with only three working links. The discography article adds little info to the discography section at the singer's page, which makes me wonder if it should not me merged, leaving this template with only two different pages. But that's another discussion. Victão Lopes ^{I hear you...} 22:41, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 00:46, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ConnecticutHikingOrgsAndWebSites[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:56, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ConnecticutHikingOrgsAndWebSites (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

External Spamlink template. WP:NOTLINKFARM. Additionally, the external links consist of blogs, clubs and other links that fail Wikipedias External Link Policies. Seems to be nothing more than an attempt at subverting accepted article inclusion policies. Hu12 (talk) 19:24, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as spam Bulwersator (talk) 16:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Some of them would turn into valid bluelinks, quite some seem not to have a valid wiki alternative. Either turn all into wikilinks, or delete as spam. --— Preceding unsigned comment added by Beetstra (talk • contribs) 17:31, 23 January 2012

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Keep These have been around for years, and exactly what is to be gained about promoting free hiking trails? As far as I can see, no notice has been posted regarding this on Wikiproject Connecticut nor Wikiproject Hiking to get a wider audience and perhaps some work on improving the references. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 15:26, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Blackmarket EP[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:57, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Blackmarket EP (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template that was possibly meant to be an article that was deleted. J36miles (talk) 18:44, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete This is clear. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:00, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:D-Money[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:57, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:D-Money (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused with no clear purpose. Only prior use was in the sandbox. J36miles (talk) 17:39, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Camilla Läckberg novels[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:57, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Camilla Läckberg novels (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Already covered by Template:Works by Camilla Läckberg J36miles (talk) 16:33, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete or redirect to Template:Works by Camilla Läckberg. Frietjes (talk) 00:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CommonwealthMedalTop[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:58, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CommonwealthMedalTop (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

replaced by other more generic medal templates. Frietjes (talk) 16:20, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Alice N' Chains[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete--Hu12 (talk) 14:21, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Alice N' Chains (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is not necessary--it's an obscure group. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:15, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Textbook WP:NENAN. Only has 4 topic links and some other links which should only be in the see also section of the main article, and maybe the other articles on a case-by-case basis. --N Y Kevin @374, i.e. 07:58, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I have no objection to this template's deletion.Shaneymike (talk) 04:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - You may, at your option, tag the template with {{db-author}}. If you do so, it will be promptly deleted and this discussion can be closed early. You are not required to do this; it is entirely optional. But if you want it to be deleted (as opposed to being indifferent), it will speed up the process. --N Y Kevin @287, i.e. 05:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Yeah I agree with what has been said so I'll go ahead and delete it myself. Thanks. Shaneymike (talk) 23:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bangkok MRT Route[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:06, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bangkok MRT Route (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No longer used; was used to call subpage templates by specifying the page name as the parameter, but this is unnecessary, and the subpages have been moved to their own names. Paul_012 (talk) 05:23, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SRT Red Lines Route[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:15, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SRT Red Lines Route (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; was created to hold subpage templates which have now been moved to their own names. Paul_012 (talk) 05:16, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SRT Red Line[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:18, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SRT Red Line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:SRT Light Red Line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Templates containing table code used in single articles and unlikely to be needed elsewhere; would be better to directly include the table in the articles. (Already subst'ed into SRT Dark Red Line and SRT Light Red Line.) Paul_012 (talk) 05:03, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.