Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 January 11
< January 10 | January 12 > |
---|
January 11
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Silverpit 8.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Roger grund (notify | contribs).
- orphaned , absent uploader, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:04, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Silverpit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Roger grund (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, absent uploader, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:05, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Silverpit1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Roger grund (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, absent uploader, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:05, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 00:05, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sim Brother.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by KevinMunro (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:08, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:08, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SimTerraEtherealMagicGrid.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Siesatia (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:09, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SimTerraMagicGrid.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Siesatia (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:09, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Simmons speaks.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dosimmon (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:10, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Simon Mantell 2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gryphonhansel (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, absent uploader, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:10, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Great picture to have on commons (international level hockey) but given the web-resolution and quality I am suspicious it is not free but is a cropped professional photo - Peripitus (Talk) 06:42, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Simoneye.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NightWingTNBA (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:14, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:14, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I have no objection to deletion. It was mostly an attempt to encourage anyone else with artistic talent to draw a better example. The ploy worked. --JJLatWiki (talk) 16:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Simple hierarchical model.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Piergiorgi (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:15, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:15, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:15, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SimpleLedCircuit.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mako098765 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned Wikiproject image Skier Dude (talk) 00:16, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SimpleLog admin.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Garrettmurray (notify | contribs).
- orphaned screenshot, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:16, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SimpleObjectCopy.svg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Radacovsky (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:17, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SimpleSample Web Screenshot.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kjk34 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned screenshot, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:17, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Simpson tree.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Earl Andrew (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article possibly The Simpsons, otherwise no other encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 00:19, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Simulation GaN.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Til.Bartel (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 00:26, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:26, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: commons--Aervanath (talk) 14:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Simvastatin 3D.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Solidach (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:26, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - it's a 3-d model with electrostatic potential form of Simvastatin. Would be useful either in discussing the chemistry of Simvastatin or Electric potential or about the creating software. Move to commons though - tagged as such - Peripitus (Talk) 23:26, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, possibly intended for Sin Embargo film Skier Dude (talk) 00:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sina anis image.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Zeramas (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This version is better: File:Sinc_function_(both).svg Bob K (talk) 13:10, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sindh5.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Khalidkhoso (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:29, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sindh2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Khalidkhoso (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:29, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SinceLive.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Astonaut180685 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:29, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Singapore Urban Explorers At Ubin Shrine.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pajeromini (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:40, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Singapore VS Bahrain 2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Farissen (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:40, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Singer Greg Cherone.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Faruhk (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, possibly intended for Greg Cherone, otherwise UE Skier Dude (talk) 00:41, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Single Window Example(trade facilitation).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Saifol (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, absent uploader, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:41, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Single battenburg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Owain.davies (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:41, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SingleCell Firingrate-Map.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Torkel (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SingleRiderAvailability.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by LordBleen (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Singletree photo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Markwlewis (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, absent uploader, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 00:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Singlewingformation.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mishatx (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:46, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Singlewingformation3.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bill Spencer5 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:47, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This file can be deleted, Thanks. --Bill Spencer (talk) 14:14, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep - tagged all to be moved to Commons Papa November (talk) 18:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sinhala-common-pitfalls.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jasy jatere (notify | contribs).
- series of orphaned Sinhala linguistic images (same uploader) - including File:Sinhala-ligatures.png - File:Sinhala-misra-other.png - File:Sinhala-misra-vowels.png - File:Sinhala-misra.png - File:Sinhala-prenasalized-stops.png - File:Sinhala-suddha.png - File:Sinhala-unicode.png - File:Sinhala-vowels.png - File:Sinhala-vowels.png Skier Dude (talk) 00:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- why not moveto wikimedia Taprobanus (talk) 03:14, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I uploaded these images. They were made in LaTeX. They are now replaced by screenshots of the HTML-tables (see Sinhala alphabet). I took the screenshots to make for a coherent appearance on the page, but the typographical quality of the LaTeX-tables is better. For wp, keeping these images is therefore not necessary, but I agree with Taprobanus that they might be useful for wikimedia. Jasy jatere (talk) 10:26, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:55, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Adding the following by same uploader-same reason: File:Lobby sitting area.jpg - File:Study room.jpg - File:Lakeside Parking lot.jpg - File:Rear path.jpg - File:Laundry room.jpg - File:Lakeside lobby.jpg - File:Lake baldwin.jpg - File:Emergency pole.jpg - File:Game room.jpg - File:Dresser.jpg - File:Cyber cafe.jpg - File:Lakeside Bathroom.jpg - File:Front entrance.jpg - File:Front of Lakeside.jpg -- first revision only of File:Bedroom.jpg Skier Dude (talk) 01:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sinza's Early Xiphoid.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xiphoid Ninja (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:56, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Papa November (talk) 19:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 00:56, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Why not move to Wikimedia ?Taprobanus (talk) 03:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- typographically quality not very good. Also no transliteration. The table as such does not seem very useful, unless you already know the letters. But could still be moved to wikimedia. Jasy jatere (talk) 10:29, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Estadio Internacional Monterrey.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by GznQS (notify | contribs).
- Copyright violation, this image was not created by the user, it has been taken from here EOZyo (мѕğ) 00:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sirmatt01.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cintrianex (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Siteoverview.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Samaster1991 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:23, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SixearchArch.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Illuminated (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:23, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:24, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Skagenconcert.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Conceptvirus (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:24, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:25, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Skew.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vance.naughton (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, absent uploader, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:26, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Skiing.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Malin Tokyo (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:26, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Skipjack Herring.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Huggingdelusions (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:26, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Skipps.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by FallenWings47 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Skippy.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Skippy1212 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Skoar issue 15 contents.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Laalchee (notify | contribs).
- orphaned screenshot, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned screenshot, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sky-15.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Smitycroft Project (notify | contribs).
- orphaned screenshot, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:29, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Skybox.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Count de Des Moines (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:29, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, absent uploader, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:34, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sloped Armour Diagram v4.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dhatfield (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:34, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sloped Armour Diagram v6.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dhatfield (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:34, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SlipstreamShot.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ToddskiW (notify | contribs).
- orphaned screenshot, absent uploader, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, absent uploader, UE Skier Dude (talk) 01:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear (probable personal image) Skier Dude (talk) 01:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Slurredmurrays.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Reallybadreverb (notify | contribs).
- OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 01:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Small modified (Stamp small).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vidricarion (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:02, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Small-rhombidodecahedron.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tomruen (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete ok, replaced by Image:Small rhombidodecahedron.png Tom Ruen (talk) 01:40, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SmallJodieSWEETin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bethanyshondark (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Smallest handwritten bhagawad gita.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Anuraaggaur (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:40, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear (personal image?) Skier Dude (talk) 01:41, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:41, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Smart page generator.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Khanzir (notify | contribs).
- orphaned screenshot, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:41, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Smarter child.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vanhalenrulesforever (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Smbaner.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Georgefernand0 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear (personal image?) Skier Dude (talk) 01:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear (personal image?) Skier Dude (talk) 01:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned screenshot, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Smerka man going on greezy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Smerka ds (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear (personal image) Skier Dude (talk) 01:44, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Wikipedia is not a social networking site, and it is also spam. --Marianian (talk) 17:58, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Smidy.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by IiDanny144. (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:44, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Smiley gangsta.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TannerBrooks (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:44, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Smiley of Doom3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Snarkyone (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, absent uploader, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:45, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 01:45, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Smilingshiba.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aiyiaxitsxtiffy (notify | contribs).
- OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 01:45, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Smilodon skeleton.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Simpsonkid (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, bad flashback & reflections/ UE Skier Dude (talk) 01:46, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear (all revisions!) Note to closing admin, please upload a generic-warning image & protect from overwriting this as an overly generic image name Skier Dude (talk) 01:47, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Smithhallgeorgiatech.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Excaliburhorn (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:47, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 01:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Robotic raptor.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Simpsonkid (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, blurred image, UE Skier Dude (talk) 01:50, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:T-rex skull.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Simpsonkid (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, blurred & highly pixelated, UE Skier Dude (talk) 01:50, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep - image is in the public domain as the banknote is demonetized Papa November (talk) 19:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Zimbabwe $2 1980 Obverse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mangwanani (notify | contribs).
- This is one of 203 non-free images in galeries in Banknotes of Zimbabwe. They should probably all be deleted, but I am nominating just this one as a test case. The use fails WP:NFCC#3. The article might be able to use one or two non-free images (with more commentary), but not dozens. Fails also WP:NFCC#8. The image is used only as an illustration; the accompanying text (“Chiremba Balancing Rocks and African buffalo”) is perfectly understandable without the images. The galeries were created according to the WikiProject Numismatics style guideline for currency articles, which works fine for free images, but for non-free images it conflicts with WP:NFCC. —teb728 t c 02:03, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Where is the evidence that these are anything other than free images? Many government products are not copyrighted. I'm not saying they aren't copyrighted, but I see no information one way or another that they are not free (though I noticed the copyright notices). — BQZip01 — talk 05:19, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It’s unlikely; I looked for free images in Commons. Some other country’s banknotes there are free: For example Commons:Category:Banknotes of Switzerland has 113 images, supported by the Commons:Template:PD-Switzerland-official copyright tag. Commons:Category:Euro banknotes has 50 images, supported by the Commons:Template:money-EU copyright tag. In contrast Commons:Category:Banknotes of Zimbabwe has 3 images—all of them with bogus “I photographed it; so I can release it” licenses. —teb728 t c 06:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Just because something doesn't have a template doesn't mean it isn't free. That said, if we find out the money is indeed a PD image, wanna help me create a template for Zimbabwean money? — BQZip01 — talk 07:12, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support for new template: I believe there is a copyright waiver on banknote images but the fair use rationales are incompatible with these images. Therefore a tailored template would be required to state this case. --Marianian (talk) 11:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Just because something doesn't have a template doesn't mean it isn't free. That said, if we find out the money is indeed a PD image, wanna help me create a template for Zimbabwean money? — BQZip01 — talk 07:12, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It’s unlikely; I looked for free images in Commons. Some other country’s banknotes there are free: For example Commons:Category:Banknotes of Switzerland has 113 images, supported by the Commons:Template:PD-Switzerland-official copyright tag. Commons:Category:Euro banknotes has 50 images, supported by the Commons:Template:money-EU copyright tag. In contrast Commons:Category:Banknotes of Zimbabwe has 3 images—all of them with bogus “I photographed it; so I can release it” licenses. —teb728 t c 06:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: None of the banknotes have the © symbol on them. Note the British banknotes which DO have the symbol printed on the banknote making the image copyrighted. Mangwanani (talk) 13:05, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment So why is everyone assuming the images are copyright? I have checked the Reserve bank of Zimbabwe Act and there is nothing pertinent. Babakathy (talk) 20:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Reasons for believing the image is non-free include the non-free tags on the image description page, the lack of Zimbabwe currency images on Commons, and Zimbabwe’s history as part of the British Empire. (British currency is under Crown copyright; it is likely that Zimbabwe continues the tradition.) Of course the tags could be mistaken; the absence on Commons could be from nobody uploading images there; and Zimbabwe could have broken the imperial tradition. The place to look for an authoritative answer is in Zimbabwe copyright law. —teb728 t c 21:15, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It is possible to display British banknotes on Wikipedia, provided that: the colours on the reproduction differ distinctly from the main colours used on any of the current series of Bank of England banknotes, and the reproduction includes the word “SPECIMEN” twice in solid black capital letters: once from the bottom left corner to the top centre and once from the bottom centre to the top right corner – the length of the word “SPECIMEN” must not be less than one-third of the length of the reproduction and the height of the characters must not be less than one-eighth of the height of the reproduction. --Marianian (talk) 22:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I believe that what you are referring to is not a free license but permission from the Bank of England for use only on Wikipedia. Inasmuch as it is not a free license, the use is also limited by Wikipedia’s non-free content policy, which provides among other things “Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information”; and “Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding.” —teb728 t c 00:57, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It is possible to display British banknotes on Wikipedia, provided that: the colours on the reproduction differ distinctly from the main colours used on any of the current series of Bank of England banknotes, and the reproduction includes the word “SPECIMEN” twice in solid black capital letters: once from the bottom left corner to the top centre and once from the bottom centre to the top right corner – the length of the word “SPECIMEN” must not be less than one-third of the length of the reproduction and the height of the characters must not be less than one-eighth of the height of the reproduction. --Marianian (talk) 22:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Reasons for believing the image is non-free include the non-free tags on the image description page, the lack of Zimbabwe currency images on Commons, and Zimbabwe’s history as part of the British Empire. (British currency is under Crown copyright; it is likely that Zimbabwe continues the tradition.) Of course the tags could be mistaken; the absence on Commons could be from nobody uploading images there; and Zimbabwe could have broken the imperial tradition. The place to look for an authoritative answer is in Zimbabwe copyright law. —teb728 t c 21:15, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment So why is everyone assuming the images are copyright? I have checked the Reserve bank of Zimbabwe Act and there is nothing pertinent. Babakathy (talk) 20:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep this image but Remove images of banknotes that have not yet been demonetized. Mangwanani posted at WP:MCQ the Zimbabwe Copyright Act of 1966 section 50 subsection (1)(b) which says for banknotes and coins, “the term of such copyright shall be the period from the date on which such bank notes or coin are issued until such bank notes or coin are demonetized in terms of the said Act.” (This act has been superseded by the Zimbabwe Copyright Bill of 2000, but that probably did not the term of copyright.) The images of the demonetized banknotes should be uploaded to Commons (or at least retagged PD). —teb728 t c 23:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- WOW Had to look up demonetized. For those interested, it means the money is worthless and has been superseded by another form of currency. I think we should hold off for now, but let's continue to see if we can get a better opinion on the subject. — BQZip01 — talk 23:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Question Does the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe have information about reproduction of current circulating notes? It may be possible to retain the current runs, as long as they conform to reproduction rules. The use of images has been the largest improvement to the article in nearly a year. --Marianian (talk) 08:57, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: In a way, all of the Zimbabwe dollars have been demonetised. Are any of you in Zimbabwe? Coz it is almost impossible to get hold of any Zimbabwe dollars in HARARE (the capital!). We all use US dollars now so in a way, the Zimbabwe dollar has become superseded by the US Currency in a kind of de facto way... Mangwanani (talk) 16:59, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: and all others of the first and second dollar at least. If these images greatly improved the article, then let it be. Please archive if agreed. --Marianian (talk) 08:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. (Fix rationales if required). This is exactly what an article on the history of the banknotes of a country should contain. A systematic survey clearly "significantly improves the understanding of the topic". Removing arbitrary notes would clearly take away from that understanding. The use is clearly transformative - we are not using the images for their original purposes (as currency), but for an encyclopedic article on the history of the currency. And the use is indeed "minimal", as per U.S. case law - no more is being used than is needed to achieve that objective. Legal, valuable, encyclopedic. Keep. Jheald (talk) 22:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete as exact duplicate of File:Contrailsoverfield.jpg Papa November (talk) 19:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Chemtrailsoverfield.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PiccoloNamek (notify | contribs).
- Violation of WP:OR. There is no evidence to suggest that the image contains what the photographer/user claims. — BQZip01 — talk 04:55, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Lame. It is of course difficult if not impossible to prove that chemtrails exist. (As as skeptic, I don't believe that they do.) That being said, the purpose of the image is to show what believers claim chemtrails look like, not to offer proof of their existence. Why not just changed the file name to something like purported chemtails. (Or alleged chemtrails, or whatever.)PiccoloNamek (talk)
- WP:AGF, feel free to change the name of the file and its caption, but even if they are changed, this is a photo you took and, since you don't believe in chemtrails (me too), this is original research to say that these are the trails that they say are chemtrails. If the image name and description are changed, I have no problem keeping this image. Inclusion on the chemtrail page is a matter of opinion (these are contrails and we already have pictures of contrails on the page), but I wouldn't be against their inclusion if properly labeled. — BQZip01 — talk 21:47, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- User has received ample time to alter said image. I think we have little choice but to delete. Though not exclusively a reason for deletion, this image is redundant as there are plenty of pictures of contrails. — BQZip01 — talk 06:41, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The only problem I can imagine with this image is that it may not be ideally named. That is not a reason for deletion. As far as I can tell neither the image description page nor the use in the article has ever pretended that it shows anything other than what it is. If anyone feels strongly enough, they should boldly change the image description page and/or the caption in the article. Or if someone has a better image of “chemtrail”-like contrails, they should boldly replace the image. —teb728 t c 23:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- As I expressed above, I have no problem with changing the caption, but the file name remains misleading and I cannot change the image name. Accordingly, it should be removed as it furthers and agenda contrary to WP:OR — BQZip01 — talk 05:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no evidence that chemtrails exist, so to say they are "chemtrail-like" furthers the agenda by stating there is something "like" a chemtrail...which there isn't. — BQZip01 — talk 07:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- As I expressed above, I have no problem with changing the caption, but the file name remains misleading and I cannot change the image name. Accordingly, it should be removed as it furthers and agenda contrary to WP:OR — BQZip01 — talk 05:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Poor choice of name, but the content of the image is relevent for the purpose of both 'chemtrails' and 'contrails'. Raeky (talk) 13:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- As I expressed above, I have no problem with changing the caption, but the file name remains misleading and I cannot change the image name. Accordingly, it should be removed as it furthers and agenda contrary to WP:OR. It is also not relevant as the caption asserts something unproven, in contradiction with WP:OR. — BQZip01 — talk 05:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I find it hard to believe the title of this image breaks WP:OR, I'm sure you could find plenty of other images with filenames that would be just as controversial as your making this one out to be. Raeky (talk) 11:06, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sure I could, but we aren't talking about those images and that is not a valid rationale to keep the image. We're talking about this one. — BQZip01 — talk 07:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I find it hard to believe the title of this image breaks WP:OR, I'm sure you could find plenty of other images with filenames that would be just as controversial as your making this one out to be. Raeky (talk) 11:06, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- As I expressed above, I have no problem with changing the caption, but the file name remains misleading and I cannot change the image name. Accordingly, it should be removed as it furthers and agenda contrary to WP:OR. It is also not relevant as the caption asserts something unproven, in contradiction with WP:OR. — BQZip01 — talk 05:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This is ridiculous. A filename is grounds for OR now? Really, Wikipedia is going to legislate itself out of existence before long... MalikCarr (talk) 04:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I've said this time and again and people don't seem to be reading the whole discussion. The caption isn't appropriate and the name of the file isn't appropriate. Change those and I !vote keep. Until then, it needs to go. — BQZip01 — talk 06:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If you don't like the caption, change it. You are the only person who thinks the filename is a serious problem. —teb728 t c 06:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The caption isn't the only problem
- I can't change the filename, otherwise I would. Only an admin or the original uploader can do that. Since none have seen fit to do so, this is my last resort. — BQZip01 — talk 07:07, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If you don't like the caption, change it. You are the only person who thinks the filename is a serious problem. —teb728 t c 06:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I've said this time and again and people don't seem to be reading the whole discussion. The caption isn't appropriate and the name of the file isn't appropriate. Change those and I !vote keep. Until then, it needs to go. — BQZip01 — talk 06:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Good night. A bazillion people say keep because it's "easy to fix" but no one does it. Ok, I've fixed it by uploading another copy with the details changed. Now it is also a duplicate and should be removed ASAP! — BQZip01 — talk 06:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No one else "fixed" it because no one else saw a need for anything to be fixed. —teb728 t c 07:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep Delete - The image fails NFCC#1 (image is entirely replaceable by text such as "Volume 2 had identical cover artwork to Volume 1 except for the volume number"). This point was not addressed in any of the "keep" comments below. Papa November (talk) 19:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:1969 live 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fantailfan (notify | contribs).
- Alternate (extra volume) album cover that is not discussed anywhere in the article. Article already has a copyrighted album cover (virtually identical ) and this extra image, without sourced commentary on it, fails: NFCC#3 as excessive use and NFCC#8 in not significantly increasing reader's understanding. Just because an alternate cover, for the second volumen, exists is not a compelling reason for it to have a copyrighted image here, the image is simply performing a decorative function - Peripitus (Talk) 08:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Blatant deletionist attitude. An additional album cover is an important part of the subject itself and its correctly licensed use on Wikipedia is acceptable for significant understanding of the main subject. Correctly licensed use on a legitimate article is not a reason for deletion. Archivey (talk) 19:07, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I will ask this in only one of today's debates to prevent needless edits...how does it significantly increase reader's understanding ?. Sure it shows what the additional cover looks like, but why is this required for people to understand the topic ? Why, in terms of the non-free content criteria do we need this and other below images ? - Peripitus (Talk) 21:02, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep If I'm allowed a vote. The additional cover art signifies that a second volume including the same title and artwork was issued when its compact disc version was released. It also serves to reinforce the fact that the original double album edition is now only available as two separately-titled and numbered (both catalog and UPC) editions and not in its original form.
- Whether the artwork is virtually the same or completely different is of no consequence. The degree of difference of cover art between editions is not, and has never served as a criterion for inclusion or removal in a WP:Albums article in and of itself.
- To put it differently, Live: 1969 Vol. 2 is a separate product which does not need its own Wikipedia article, only additional content and a facsimile representation of its cover artwork to distinguish it, in a single article. Using words only to describe the distinct and separate later edition is inadequate. - Fantailfan (talk) 21:32, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It is of great consequence. In this case we have two images, largely identical except for a piece of text. The additional image could be adequately replaced by the note (sourced) "Volume 2 had identical cover artwork to Volume 1 except for the volume number" - the image is replaceable by text alone. - Peripitus (Talk) 02:17, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- In addition, it is not extra cover artwork, and is a second album entirely. Both albums are represented by a single article rather than two. Again, "he degree of difference of cover art between editions is not, and has never served as a criterion for inclusion or removal in a WP:Albums article in and of itself." Fantailfan (talk) 15:00, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8 — excessive use of copyrighted material, and image does not add anything to the readers' understanding of the article which text would not. Stifle (talk) 14:08, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Sgeureka (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:James Blunt 1973 Alternate Cover.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Efe (notify | contribs).
- Alternate single cover that is not discussed anywhere in the article. Article already has a copyrighted cover and this extra image, without sourced commentary on it, fails: NFCC#3 as excessive use and NFCC#8 in not significantly increasing reader's understanding. Just because an alternate cover exists is not a compelling reason for it to have a copyrighted image here, the image is simply performing a decorative function - Peripitus (Talk) 08:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi. Although I can delete the image myself, I instead requested for a speedy deletion. --Efe (talk) 08:18, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Nominator's rationale was not successfully refuted. Stifle (talk) 14:09, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:GAM's Amai Yuwaku (limited).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Eugh jei (notify | contribs).
- Alternate album cover that is not discussed anywhere in the article. Article already has a copyrighted album cover and this extra image, without sourced commentary on it, fails: NFCC#3 as excessive use and NFCC#8 in not significantly increasing reader's understanding. The only commentary in the article states that the item exists, not anything about the image on it. Just because an alternate cover exists is not a compelling reason for it to have a copyrighted image here, the image is simply performing a decorative function - Peripitus (Talk) 08:16, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Blatant deletionist attitude. An additional album cover is an important part of the subject itself and its correctly licensed use on Wikipedia is acceptable for significant understanding of the main subject. Correctly licensed use on a legitimate article is not a reason for deletion. Archivey (talk) 19:08, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep Papa November (talk) 20:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Alternate album cover that is not discussed anywhere in the article. Article already has a copyrighted album cover and this extra image, without sourced commentary on it, fails: NFCC#3 as excessive use and NFCC#8 in not significantly increasing reader's understanding. Just because an alternate cover exists is not a compelling reason for it to have a copyrighted image here, the image is simply performing a decorative function - Peripitus (Talk) 08:20, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Blatant deletionist attitude. An additional album cover is an important part of the subject itself and its correctly licensed use on Wikipedia is acceptable for significant understanding of the main subject. Correctly licensed use on a legitimate article is not a reason for deletion. Archivey (talk) 19:09, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - the above argument isn't correct. Just because an album cover has correct tags, it doesn't automatically imply the image should be kept. PhilKnight (talk) 17:32, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Completely different artwork. (See article 2 Become 1) Showing the identifying images for a record is considered part of the "significant understanding" an article should convey about it. That isn't restricted just to the UK identifying image, nor to just the U.S. identifying image. When there are very different images in the UK and the U.S. as here, each is significant and should be shown. Jheald (talk) 12:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:2heartshalternatecover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Underneath-it-All (notify | contribs).
- Alternate album cover that is not discussed anywhere in the article. Article already has a copyrighted album cover and this extra image, without sourced commentary on it, fails: NFCC#3 as excessive use and NFCC#8 in not significantly increasing reader's understanding. Just because an alternate cover exists is not a compelling reason for it to have a copyrighted image here, the image is simply performing a decorative function - Peripitus (Talk) 08:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Blatant deletionist attitude. An additional album cover is an important part of the subject itself and its correctly licensed use on Wikipedia is acceptable for significant understanding of the main subject. Correctly licensed use on a legitimate article is not a reason for deletion. Archivey (talk) 19:09, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fairly obviously. Adds nothing to article, isn't discussed, is practically identical to first image, not required for identification, fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Anything I've missed? Black Kite 12:47, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Janet Jackson - Alright Euro.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Funk Junkie (notify | contribs).
- Alternate album cover that is not discussed anywhere in the article. Article already has a copyrighted album cover and this extra image, without sourced commentary on it, fails: NFCC#3 as excessive use and NFCC#8 in not significantly increasing reader's understanding. Just because an alternate cover exists is not a compelling reason for it to have a copyrighted image here, the image is simply performing a decorative function - Peripitus (Talk) 08:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Blatant deletionist attitude. An additional album cover is an important part of the subject itself and its correctly licensed use on Wikipedia is acceptable for significant understanding of the main subject. Correctly licensed use on a legitimate article is not a reason for deletion. Archivey (talk) 19:10, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fairly obviously. Adds nothing to article, isn't discussed at all let alone in reliable sources, no notable artwork, fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Anything I've missed? Black Kite 12:47, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as I1 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:20, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:KC MyLife.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Unwrittendrew700 (notify | contribs).
- No Article. Article was deleted as per wikipedia guidelines. 76.109.42.17 (talk) 08:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Japoneses no brasil.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Skanter (notify | contribs).
- Tagged as being on Commons as commons:File:Japoneses no brasil.jpg. I8 is not applicable because the images differ too much. What do you think? -- lucasbfr talk 11:09, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File history contains an image that was recently deleted as possibly unfree file (see here.) -- DavidDCM (talk) 12:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Myanmar-army-flag.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lazauk (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned DavidDCM (talk) 12:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, low quality, intended use unknown. DavidDCM (talk) 12:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, intended use unknown as no description is given. DavidDCM (talk) 12:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, intended use unknown as no description is given. DavidDCM (talk) 12:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, intended use unknown as no description is given. DavidDCM (talk) 12:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, intended use unknown as no description is given. DavidDCM (talk) 12:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mm-artillery-flag2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Okkar (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, kind of redundant to File:Mm-artillery-flag.jpg). DavidDCM (talk) 12:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned. DavidDCM (talk) 12:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned. DavidDCM (talk) 12:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned. DavidDCM (talk) 12:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned. DavidDCM (talk) 12:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned. DavidDCM (talk) 12:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Seangreenhalgh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by HardRain62 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use, would need to be an SVG anyway. B (talk) 18:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep - image has been moved out of a gallery, which seems to address one of the main deletion reasons Papa November (talk) 20:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding of the article. PhilKnight (talk) 23:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - This logo is part of the main identity for WYGY during it's "Jammin' Oldies" era (as WMOJ) and represents a main part of the station's history that words alone can't convey. RobDe68 (talk) 03:49, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the image is used only in a decorative gallery with no sourced commentary. Fails WP:NFCC#8, WP:NFCC#3. - Peripitus (Talk) 05:23, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as a station logo uniquely illustrates the marketing, branding, format, style, and identity of a radio station and the era in which it operated in a way that any amount of description cannot. This is a low-res image and a single current logo cannot convey equivalent significant information about past incarnations of the station. The presence of this historic logo does, in my experience, significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic of the article. - Dravecky (talk) 09:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per same reasons listed by RobDe68 & Dravecky. Station logos significantly help in aiding a reader's understanding of the past & present of the station because the logo can convey a "feel" of a former time & place that standard text does not. For example, look at anything from the 1950s using the Futura font, a font not really in heavy use today. It puts forth the feel of the 1950s.Stereorock (talk) 15:33, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Use is consistent with article and contributes significantly to understanding. Archivey (talk) 19:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-free images should never be used in galleries. Stifle (talk) 21:16, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The present logo is acceptable for the purpose of identification. But the historic logos are not needed: the article is perfectly understandable without them. —teb728 t c 22:35, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep - Image has been removed from gallery, which seems to address one of the main deletion reasons
- Doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding of the article. PhilKnight (talk) 23:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This logo was part of the main identity for WYGY prior to a frequency swap with WSWD and represents a main part of the station's history that words alone can't convey. RobDe68 (talk) 03:56, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the image is used only in a decorative gallery with no sourced commentary. Fails WP:NFCC#8, WP:NFCC#3. - Peripitus (Talk) 05:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as a station logo uniquely illustrates the marketing, branding, format, style, and identity of a radio station and the era in which it operated in a way that any amount of description cannot. This is a low-res image and the single current logo cannot convey equivalent significant information about past incarnations of the station. The presence of this historic logo does, in my experience, significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic of the article. - Dravecky (talk) 09:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per same reasons listed by RobDe68 & Dravecky. Station logos significantly help in aiding a reader's understanding of the past & present of the station because the logo can convey a "feel" of a former time & place that standard text does not. For example, look at anything from the 1950s using the Futura font, a font not really in heavy use today. It puts forth the feel of the 1950s.Stereorock (talk) 15:34, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Use is consistent with article and contributes significantly to understanding. Archivey (talk) 19:12, 12 January —Preceding undated comment was added at 19:15, 12 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete. Non-free images should never be used in galleries. Stifle (talk) 21:17, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The present logo is acceptable for the purpose of identification. But the historic logos are not needed: the article is perfectly understandable without them. —teb728 t c 22:36, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- insufficient info on copyright status. almost certainly published post-1923 based on "pope"'s birthdate Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:32, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, superseded by File:Risperidone.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Pig_T-shirt.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SimonMayer (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:38, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, superseded by File:Phenytoin structure.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:41, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.