Wikipedia:Notability: historial de revisions

22 juny 2024

• actprev 08:1908:19, 22 juny 2024‎ Joe Roe discussió contribucions‎ 33.260 octets −1‎ Sorry but no, this is not correct. Whether sources are cited and whether they exist are two independent questions; that's the whole point of this section. Etiqueta: Desfés
• actprev 02:5602:56, 22 juny 2024‎ HTGS discussió contribucions‎ 33.261 octets +1‎ →‎Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article: Fine by me, @David Eppstein. I assume you’re ok with the shift from “indicate” to “guarantee” by itself. An absence of sourcing certainly DOES suggest or imply or indicate that an article is non-notable, but it of course does not guarantee that Etiquetes: Revertida editor de codi 2017

21 juny 2024

• actprev 12:1912:19, 21 juny 2024‎ Masem discussió contribucions‎ 33.260 octets +9‎ →‎Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article: add "Wikipedia" article as to be clear what we are talking about
• actprev 07:0407:04, 21 juny 2024‎ David Eppstein discussió contribucions‎ 33.251 octets −40‎ Undid revision 1230174205 by HTGS (talk) This changes the meaning and requires discussion. Your NEW assertion that nonexistence of independent, published reliable sources indicates non-notability is an assertion that GNG trumps all other SNGs, which is false. Not all SNGs rely on such sources and we should not assume or state that to be the only way of achieving notability. Etiqueta: Desfés
• actprev 04:1804:18, 21 juny 2024‎ HTGS discussió contribucions‎ 33.291 octets +40‎ →‎Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article: No sources definitely does “indicate” that an article isn’t notable, but it doesn’t guarantee it; Also move lengthy parenthetical to end of para Etiquetes: Revertida editor de codi 2017

16 juny 2024

• actprev 15:3615:36, 16 juny 2024‎ ActivelyDisinterested discussió contribucions‎ 33.251 octets −8‎ Undid revision 1229385627 by Clearfrienda (talk) Generally only well used shortcuts are included Etiqueta: Desfés
• actprev 14:2114:21, 16 juny 2024‎ CFA discussió contribucions‎ 33.259 octets +8‎ →‎Subject-specific notability guidelines: new shortcut, feel free to revert Etiqueta: Revertida

10 juny 2024

• actprev 06:1306:13, 10 juny 2024‎ WhatamIdoing discussió contribucions‎ 33.251 octets +3‎ No change to meaning intended Etiqueta: editor visual

28 maig 2024

• actprev 19:3119:31, 28 maig 2024‎ WhatamIdoing discussió contribucions‎ 33.248 octets +18‎ →‎Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article: Clearer? Etiqueta: editor de codi 2017

25 maig 2024

• actprev 14:3314:33, 25 maig 2024‎ Hairy Dude discussió contribucions‎ 33.230 octets −1‎ →‎General notability guideline: fix broken list Etiquetes: Edita des de mòbil Edició web per a mòbils Advanced mobile edit

11 maig 2024

• actprev 23:2023:20, 11 maig 2024‎ SmokeyJoe discussió contribucions‎ 33.231 octets −20‎ →‎Stand-alone lists: per WP:LINKBOXES, with 90-day pageviews of 91, 397, 547, WP:NLIST is well ahead as the preferred shortcut to be recommended. All shortcuts will continue to work.

30 abr 2024

• actprev 05:0205:02, 30 abr 2024‎ Masem discussió contribucions‎ 33.251 octets +157‎ →‎Articles not satisfying the notability guidelines: we should link to BEFORE here, this is a simple attempt to include that

27 abr 2024

• actprev 22:2622:26, 27 abr 2024‎ WhatamIdoing discussió contribucions‎ 33.094 octets −3‎ →‎Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article: Parallel Etiqueta: editor de codi 2017

17 abr 2024

• actprev 21:1621:16, 17 abr 2024‎ HTGS discussió contribucions‎ 33.097 octets −18‎ →‎Stand-alone lists: avoid redirect in hatnote Etiqueta: editor de codi 2017

18 feb 2024

• actprev 16:0616:06, 18 feb 2024‎ Masem discussió contribucions‎ 33.115 octets +22‎ Reverted good faith edits by Polygnotus (talk): Wrong. SNGs are reviewed though global consensus before they can be moved out of essay or draft stage Etiquetes: Twinkle Desfés
• actprev 16:0516:05, 18 feb 2024‎ Polygnotus discussió contribucions‎ 33.093 octets −22‎ SNGs don't have broad consensus, WP:GNG does Etiqueta: Revertida

14 gen 2024

• actprev 19:4619:46, 14 gen 2024‎ Huggums537 discussió contribucions‎ 33.115 octets +2‎ →‎Stand-alone lists: Matching to be consistent with the language used in the link later in the sentence and to avoid confusion between list entries and prose used in the lead for example.

11 gen 2024

• actprev 03:1603:16, 11 gen 2024‎ WhatamIdoing discussió contribucions‎ 33.113 octets −6‎ →‎Articles not satisfying the notability guidelines: Correct name Etiqueta: editor de codi 2017
• actprev 03:1103:11, 11 gen 2024‎ WhatamIdoing discussió contribucions‎ 33.119 octets +604‎ →‎Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article: Color coding might help? Etiqueta: editor de codi 2017
• actprev 03:0303:03, 11 gen 2024‎ WhatamIdoing discussió contribucions‎ 32.515 octets +75‎ →‎Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article: Sources must be independent for notability purposes Etiqueta: editor de codi 2017

28 des 2023

• actprev 20:4620:46, 28 des 2023‎ Three Sixty discussió contribucions‎ 32.440 octets +24‎ →‎General notability guideline: wikilinking

17 des 2023

• actprev 04:2804:28, 17 des 2023‎ Wracking discussió contribucions‎ 32.416 octets +2‎ →‎Subject-specific notability guidelines: c/e: assuming this should say "articles" not "topics"

19 nov 2023

• actprev 06:1806:18, 19 nov 2023‎ Fgnievinski discussió contribucions‎ 32.414 octets +14‎ →‎Article content does not determine notability: wl related sections Etiquetes: Edita des de mòbil edició a través de l'aplicació mòbil Android app edit

29 oct 2023

• actprev 23:0123:01, 29 oct 2023‎ Masem discussió contribucions‎ 32.400 octets −99‎ Reverted good faith edits by TompaDompa (talk): I have a bad feeling this will be a problem since it implies notability is required. There's a reason this is a guideline. Etiquetes: Twinkle Desfés
• actprev 21:3221:32, 29 oct 2023‎ TompaDompa discussió contribucions‎ 32.499 octets +99‎ →‎Whether to create standalone pages: Notability is necessary but not sufficient for a stand-alone article to exist. Etiquetes: Revertida editor de codi 2017

28 oct 2023

• actprev 00:2400:24, 28 oct 2023‎ Curbon7 discussió contribucions‎ 32.400 octets −11‎ Reverting edit(s) by Butwhatdoiknow (talk) to rev. 1182200024 by Red-tailed hawk: WP:BRD, the bold edit was reverted so discuss; luckily there is already an open discussion regarding this on the talk page. (RW 16.1) Etiquetes: RW Desfés
• actprev 00:1400:14, 28 oct 2023‎ Butwhatdoiknow discussió contribucions‎ 32.411 octets +11‎ Undid revision 1182200024 by Red-tailed hawk (talk) Community consensus is not required for bold changes. See wp:PGBOLD and wp:DRNC. Do you have a substantive objection to the change? If so, re-revert and state it in your edit summary. Etiquetes: Desfés Revertida

27 oct 2023

• actprev 19:3219:32, 27 oct 2023‎ Red-tailed hawk discussió contribucions‎ 32.400 octets −11‎ Restore definition that was WP:BOLDly changed in Special:Diff/1175779876 without community consensus. Etiquetes: Reversió manual Revertida

13 oct 2023

• actprev 00:1600:16, 13 oct 2023‎ Masem discussió contribucions‎ 32.411 octets +11‎ still need "rebuttable" in here Etiqueta: Revertida
• actprev 00:0500:05, 13 oct 2023‎ Espresso Addict discussió contribucions‎ 32.400 octets −22‎ Removing word "rebuttably"; link is a redirect to presumption

7 oct 2023

• actprev 18:0018:00, 7 oct 2023‎ HJ Mitchell discussió contribucions‎ 32.422 octets 0‎ Undid revision 1179072050 by JK Nair (talk) see MOS:LQ Etiqueta: Desfés
• actprev 17:5917:59, 7 oct 2023‎ JK Nair discussió contribucions‎ m 32.422 octets 0‎ Cap resum de modificació Etiqueta: Revertida

21 set 2023

• actprev 04:0404:04, 21 set 2023‎ Seraphimblade discussió contribucions‎ 32.422 octets −18‎ This is a common enough word that the Wiktionary link is not needed. Etiqueta: Reversió manual
• actprev 03:3203:32, 21 set 2023‎ WhatamIdoing discussió contribucions‎ 32.440 octets +18‎ Undid revision 1176208273 by BilledMammal (talk) Apparently it is necessary (though not sufficient), since we reportedly have editors who think "significant coverage" means "I think it's an important subject". Etiquetes: Desfés Revertida

20 set 2023

• actprev 06:3106:31, 20 set 2023‎ BilledMammal discussió contribucions‎ 32.422 octets −18‎ Undid revision 1176201674 by WhatamIdoing (talk) Seems unnecessary? Etiquetes: Desfés Revertida
• actprev 04:5604:56, 20 set 2023‎ WhatamIdoing discussió contribucions‎ 32.440 octets +18‎ →‎General notability guideline: Link Etiquetes: Revertida editor de codi 2017

17 set 2023

• actprev 11:0911:09, 17 set 2023‎ Ca discussió contribucions‎ 32.422 octets −20‎ fix easteregg link and remove reference to location (MOS changes) Etiqueta: editor visual

29 ago 2023

• actprev 03:4803:48, 29 ago 2023‎ David Eppstein discussió contribucions‎ 32.442 octets −1‎ Undid revision 1172754898 by Cassiopeia (talk) this is circular, if "notable" is used with its usual Wikipedia-guideline meaning of "can we have a Wikipedia article" Etiqueta: Desfés
• actprev 02:4902:49, 29 ago 2023‎ Cassiopeia discussió contribucions‎ 32.443 octets +1‎ →‎Self-promotion and publicity: restored - as per WP:N guidelines definition. Etiquetes: Revertida editor de codi 2017

25 ago 2023

• actprev 17:3917:39, 25 ago 2023‎ Masem discussió contribucions‎ 32.442 octets +93‎ Undid revision 1172212359 by WhatamIdoing (talk) Keeping the moved sentence where it was moved too , but readding the starting part about requiring independent sources which applies generally
• actprev 17:2017:20, 25 ago 2023‎ WhatamIdoing discussió contribucions‎ 32.349 octets −92‎ Move sentence to relevant section Etiqueta: editor visual
• actprev 17:1917:19, 25 ago 2023‎ WhatamIdoing discussió contribucions‎ 32.441 octets +101‎ Links Etiqueta: editor visual

13 ago 2023

• actprev 23:0723:07, 13 ago 2023‎ Ca discussió contribucions‎ 32.340 octets −25‎ Per consensus at Wikipedia_talk:Notability#Remove_confusing_passage? Etiquetes: Reversió manual editor visual

9 ago 2023

• actprev 08:5608:56, 9 ago 2023‎ Wjemather discussió contribucions‎ 32.365 octets +25‎ Undid revision 1169475751 by Ca (talk) this changes the meaning (expands the scope of ss exceptions beyond independence) Etiquetes: Desfés Revertida
• actprev 08:4008:40, 9 ago 2023‎ Ca discussió contribucions‎ 32.340 octets −25‎ Since Masem have not responded, I am assuming they agree with this revert. Undid revision 1169246403 by Masem (talk) Etiquetes: Desfés Revertida

8 ago 2023

• actprev 19:3119:31, 8 ago 2023‎ Fgnievinski discussió contribucions‎ 32.365 octets +31‎ →‎Fringe topics: populate single-line section with an automatic excerpt of the main topic's lead section (minus templates)
• actprev 00:0300:03, 8 ago 2023‎ Masem discussió contribucions‎ 32.334 octets +25‎ Undid revision 1169245789 by Ca (talk) please don't change wording on this page without checking talk page. This is a consensus-agreed upon text and there is discussion on this in the talk page Etiquetes: Desfés Revertida

7 ago 2023

• actprev 23:5923:59, 7 ago 2023‎ Ca discussió contribucions‎ 32.309 octets −25‎ →‎Subject-specific notability guidelines: remove confusing part of a sentence Etiquetes: Revertida editor visual

31 jul 2023

• actprev 15:0315:03, 31 jul 2023‎ Ca discussió contribucions‎ 32.334 octets +52‎ Converted unformatted section links via script.

29 jul 2023

• actprev 16:3716:37, 29 jul 2023‎ Hydronium Hydroxide discussió contribucions‎ 32.282 octets +13‎ →‎General notability guideline: Relocate SIGCOV to SIGCOV